越南和中国在南海的捕鱼权冲突

Q3 Social Sciences Sriwijaya Law Review Pub Date : 2021-07-30 DOI:10.28946/SLREV.VOL5.ISS2.875.PP205-217
Mohammad Hazyar Arumbinang, Yordan Gunawan, Rizaldy Anggriawan
{"title":"越南和中国在南海的捕鱼权冲突","authors":"Mohammad Hazyar Arumbinang, Yordan Gunawan, Rizaldy Anggriawan","doi":"10.28946/SLREV.VOL5.ISS2.875.PP205-217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to understand and clarify the international legal perspec-tive relating to the current dispute and how they are resolved according to international law between Vietnam and China over fishing rights in the South China Sea. This paper has adopted a normative legal research with a statutory and historical approaches. The data will be analysed by using de-scriptive-analytical analysis. This paper reveals that there are two legal is-sues in the fishing rights conflict between Vietnam and China. First is the legality of the Nine-dashed Line by China to claim the disputed water. Sec-ond, the legality of unilateral fishing ban policy by China over the disputed water, which both has no legality under international law. Although China claims over SCS using Nine-dashed Line and unilateral fishing ban policy under international law has no legal basis, the dispute over SCS including fishing rights continued until today. The solutions offered to solve these problems include a resolution on SCS dispute must be made legally and di-plomacy to build confidence-building measures. Ideally, both states should honour the accepted negotiation steps to agree upon compensation for the effects of the disputes and be sincere and earnest in their attempts and com-mitment to resolving their dispute.","PeriodicalId":32073,"journal":{"name":"Sriwijaya Law Review","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Fishing Rights Conflict in the South China Sea between Vietnam and China\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Hazyar Arumbinang, Yordan Gunawan, Rizaldy Anggriawan\",\"doi\":\"10.28946/SLREV.VOL5.ISS2.875.PP205-217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aims to understand and clarify the international legal perspec-tive relating to the current dispute and how they are resolved according to international law between Vietnam and China over fishing rights in the South China Sea. This paper has adopted a normative legal research with a statutory and historical approaches. The data will be analysed by using de-scriptive-analytical analysis. This paper reveals that there are two legal is-sues in the fishing rights conflict between Vietnam and China. First is the legality of the Nine-dashed Line by China to claim the disputed water. Sec-ond, the legality of unilateral fishing ban policy by China over the disputed water, which both has no legality under international law. Although China claims over SCS using Nine-dashed Line and unilateral fishing ban policy under international law has no legal basis, the dispute over SCS including fishing rights continued until today. The solutions offered to solve these problems include a resolution on SCS dispute must be made legally and di-plomacy to build confidence-building measures. Ideally, both states should honour the accepted negotiation steps to agree upon compensation for the effects of the disputes and be sincere and earnest in their attempts and com-mitment to resolving their dispute.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sriwijaya Law Review\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sriwijaya Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28946/SLREV.VOL5.ISS2.875.PP205-217\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sriwijaya Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28946/SLREV.VOL5.ISS2.875.PP205-217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究旨在了解和澄清与当前越南和中国在南中国海捕鱼权争端有关的国际法律观点,以及如何根据国际法解决这些争端。本文采用了规范性的法学研究方法,采用了成文法和历史学的研究方法。数据将通过描述-分析分析进行分析。本文揭示了中越渔业权冲突的两个法律问题。首先是中国主张争议海域的九段线的合法性。第二,中国在争议海域实施单方面禁渔政策的合法性问题,这两项政策在国际法上都不合法。虽然中国根据国际法提出的“九段线”主张和单方面禁止捕鱼政策没有法律依据,但包括捕鱼权在内的南海争议一直持续到今天。解决这些问题的办法包括必须通过法律途径解决南海争端和通过外交手段建立信任措施。理想的情况是,两国应遵守已接受的谈判步骤,就争端的影响达成赔偿协议,并真诚和认真地尝试和承诺解决它们的争端。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Fishing Rights Conflict in the South China Sea between Vietnam and China
This research aims to understand and clarify the international legal perspec-tive relating to the current dispute and how they are resolved according to international law between Vietnam and China over fishing rights in the South China Sea. This paper has adopted a normative legal research with a statutory and historical approaches. The data will be analysed by using de-scriptive-analytical analysis. This paper reveals that there are two legal is-sues in the fishing rights conflict between Vietnam and China. First is the legality of the Nine-dashed Line by China to claim the disputed water. Sec-ond, the legality of unilateral fishing ban policy by China over the disputed water, which both has no legality under international law. Although China claims over SCS using Nine-dashed Line and unilateral fishing ban policy under international law has no legal basis, the dispute over SCS including fishing rights continued until today. The solutions offered to solve these problems include a resolution on SCS dispute must be made legally and di-plomacy to build confidence-building measures. Ideally, both states should honour the accepted negotiation steps to agree upon compensation for the effects of the disputes and be sincere and earnest in their attempts and com-mitment to resolving their dispute.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sriwijaya Law Review
Sriwijaya Law Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Can the Right to A Good and Healthy Environment be Claimed as a Human Right? Judaization in Palestine: Is It Genocide According to the 1998 Rome Statute? Criminal Legal Protection for Bona Fide Third Parties Over Assets in Corruption and Money Laundering Cases Mapping and Harmonizing Qanun on Sharia Financial Institutions Problematics of Inter-Regional Cooperation in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1