“违规”奇案:解构《2020年环评通知草案》程序

Kanika Jamwal, Charul Sharma
{"title":"“违规”奇案:解构《2020年环评通知草案》程序","authors":"Kanika Jamwal, Charul Sharma","doi":"10.1080/24730580.2021.1992576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The process of environmental clearance in India is currently regulated by the Environmental Impact Assessment Notification 2006. In March 2020, the Government of India issued the Draft Environmental Impact Assessment Notification 2020, which sought to replace the 2006 Notification. The most contested provision of the Draft Notification is the procedure to deal with cases of violation. While the 2006 Notification lays down a strong regulatory procedure to deal with such cases, the Draft Notification weakens it. In this context, this Note presents two arguments. First, the Draft Notification has altered the procedure such that its deterrent effect, and potential to immediately prevent environmental harm, is diluted. Consequently, it normalizes violation and ex-post facto clearances, and weakens its risk avoidance and risk management potential. Second, the proposed procedure is counterintuitive to the precautionary principle. Accordingly, the authors iterate that the Draft Notification amplifies the threat to India’s environmental conservation commitments.","PeriodicalId":13511,"journal":{"name":"Indian Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The curious case of “violation”: deconstructing the procedure under the Draft Environmental Impact Assessment Notification 2020\",\"authors\":\"Kanika Jamwal, Charul Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24730580.2021.1992576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The process of environmental clearance in India is currently regulated by the Environmental Impact Assessment Notification 2006. In March 2020, the Government of India issued the Draft Environmental Impact Assessment Notification 2020, which sought to replace the 2006 Notification. The most contested provision of the Draft Notification is the procedure to deal with cases of violation. While the 2006 Notification lays down a strong regulatory procedure to deal with such cases, the Draft Notification weakens it. In this context, this Note presents two arguments. First, the Draft Notification has altered the procedure such that its deterrent effect, and potential to immediately prevent environmental harm, is diluted. Consequently, it normalizes violation and ex-post facto clearances, and weakens its risk avoidance and risk management potential. Second, the proposed procedure is counterintuitive to the precautionary principle. Accordingly, the authors iterate that the Draft Notification amplifies the threat to India’s environmental conservation commitments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2021.1992576\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2021.1992576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

印度的环境审批过程目前受2006年环境影响评估通知的监管。2020年3月,印度政府发布了《2020年环境影响评估通知草案》,试图取代2006年的通知。《通知草案》中争议最大的条款是处理违反案件的程序。虽然2006年的通知为处理此类案件制定了强有力的监管程序,但通知草案削弱了这一程序。在这方面,本照会提出两个论点。首先,通知草案改变了程序,使其威慑作用和立即防止环境损害的潜力被削弱。因此,它使违规行为和事后许可正常化,削弱了其风险规避和风险管理潜力。其次,拟议的程序违反了预防原则。因此,作者重申,通知草案放大了对印度环境保护承诺的威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The curious case of “violation”: deconstructing the procedure under the Draft Environmental Impact Assessment Notification 2020
ABSTRACT The process of environmental clearance in India is currently regulated by the Environmental Impact Assessment Notification 2006. In March 2020, the Government of India issued the Draft Environmental Impact Assessment Notification 2020, which sought to replace the 2006 Notification. The most contested provision of the Draft Notification is the procedure to deal with cases of violation. While the 2006 Notification lays down a strong regulatory procedure to deal with such cases, the Draft Notification weakens it. In this context, this Note presents two arguments. First, the Draft Notification has altered the procedure such that its deterrent effect, and potential to immediately prevent environmental harm, is diluted. Consequently, it normalizes violation and ex-post facto clearances, and weakens its risk avoidance and risk management potential. Second, the proposed procedure is counterintuitive to the precautionary principle. Accordingly, the authors iterate that the Draft Notification amplifies the threat to India’s environmental conservation commitments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interpreting without bannisters? The abstraction problem afflicting the basic structure doctrine Courts, mining conflicts, and Adivasi rights: a case study from central India (2000–2022) “ Mutated Sumangali Scheme ”: challenges in enforcement of labour laws in spinning mills of Tamil Nadu Protection of stakeholders’ interests in the Indian corporate landscape: examining the “ifs and buts” The maze of interpretation: abortion laws and legal indeterminacy in Indian courts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1