戊巴比妥剂量和药物混合物在固定比例和固定间隔强化计划下的鉴别

D. McMillan, W. Hardwick, Mi Li
{"title":"戊巴比妥剂量和药物混合物在固定比例和固定间隔强化计划下的鉴别","authors":"D. McMillan, W. Hardwick, Mi Li","doi":"10.1097/00008877-200105000-00005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pigeons were trained to discriminate among 5 mg/kg pentobarbital, 10 mg/kg pentobarbital, and saline, under either fixed‐interval (FI) or fixed‐ratio (FR) reinforcement schedules. When baseline responding stabilized, a higher percentage of responses occurred on the key that produced the reinforcer under the FR schedule than under the FI schedule. After low doses of pentobarbital, responding shifted from the saline key to the 5 mg/kg pentobarbital key; at higher doses of pentobarbital responding shifted to the 10 mg/kg pentobarbital key under both schedules. After low doses of ethanol and chlordiazepoxide, responding shifted from the saline key to the 5 mg/kg pentobarbital key, but after high doses of these drugs, responding continued to occur on the 5 mg/kg pentobarbital key under both reinforcement schedules. A 5 mg/kg dose of pentobarbital increased responding on the 10 mg/kg pentobarbital key when it was combined with pentobarbital, ethanol or chlordiazepoxide. Phencyclidine and d ‐amphetamine produced responding largely on the saline key under both reinforcement schedules. Under the FR schedule, pentobarbital dose–response curves were usually quantal, whereas under the FI schedule the pentobarbital dose–response curves usually were graded.","PeriodicalId":8741,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Pharmacology","volume":"48 1","pages":"195-208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discrimination of pentobarbital doses and drug mixtures under fixed‐ratio and fixed‐interval reinforcement schedules\",\"authors\":\"D. McMillan, W. Hardwick, Mi Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/00008877-200105000-00005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Pigeons were trained to discriminate among 5 mg/kg pentobarbital, 10 mg/kg pentobarbital, and saline, under either fixed‐interval (FI) or fixed‐ratio (FR) reinforcement schedules. When baseline responding stabilized, a higher percentage of responses occurred on the key that produced the reinforcer under the FR schedule than under the FI schedule. After low doses of pentobarbital, responding shifted from the saline key to the 5 mg/kg pentobarbital key; at higher doses of pentobarbital responding shifted to the 10 mg/kg pentobarbital key under both schedules. After low doses of ethanol and chlordiazepoxide, responding shifted from the saline key to the 5 mg/kg pentobarbital key, but after high doses of these drugs, responding continued to occur on the 5 mg/kg pentobarbital key under both reinforcement schedules. A 5 mg/kg dose of pentobarbital increased responding on the 10 mg/kg pentobarbital key when it was combined with pentobarbital, ethanol or chlordiazepoxide. Phencyclidine and d ‐amphetamine produced responding largely on the saline key under both reinforcement schedules. Under the FR schedule, pentobarbital dose–response curves were usually quantal, whereas under the FI schedule the pentobarbital dose–response curves usually were graded.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"195-208\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/00008877-200105000-00005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00008877-200105000-00005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

在固定间隔(FI)或固定比例(FR)强化计划下,训练鸽子区分5mg /kg戊巴比妥、10mg /kg戊巴比妥和生理盐水。当基线反应稳定时,在FR计划下产生强化剂的关键上发生的反应百分比高于FI计划下的反应百分比。低剂量戊巴比妥后,反应从生理盐水键转移到5 mg/kg戊巴比妥键;在较高剂量的戊巴比妥反应转移到10毫克/公斤戊巴比妥在两个时间表下的关键。在低剂量乙醇和氯二氮环氧化物治疗后,反应从生理盐水键转移到5 mg/kg戊巴比妥键,但在高剂量这两种药物治疗后,在两种强化方案下,反应继续发生在5 mg/kg戊巴比妥键。5 mg/kg剂量的戊巴比妥与戊巴比妥、乙醇或氯二氮环氧化物联用时,在10 mg/kg剂量的戊巴比妥基础上增加了反应。在两种强化方案下,苯环利定和d -安非他明在生理盐水键上产生应答。在FR方案下,戊巴比妥剂量-反应曲线通常是定量的,而在FI方案下,戊巴比妥剂量-反应曲线通常是分级的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Discrimination of pentobarbital doses and drug mixtures under fixed‐ratio and fixed‐interval reinforcement schedules
Pigeons were trained to discriminate among 5 mg/kg pentobarbital, 10 mg/kg pentobarbital, and saline, under either fixed‐interval (FI) or fixed‐ratio (FR) reinforcement schedules. When baseline responding stabilized, a higher percentage of responses occurred on the key that produced the reinforcer under the FR schedule than under the FI schedule. After low doses of pentobarbital, responding shifted from the saline key to the 5 mg/kg pentobarbital key; at higher doses of pentobarbital responding shifted to the 10 mg/kg pentobarbital key under both schedules. After low doses of ethanol and chlordiazepoxide, responding shifted from the saline key to the 5 mg/kg pentobarbital key, but after high doses of these drugs, responding continued to occur on the 5 mg/kg pentobarbital key under both reinforcement schedules. A 5 mg/kg dose of pentobarbital increased responding on the 10 mg/kg pentobarbital key when it was combined with pentobarbital, ethanol or chlordiazepoxide. Phencyclidine and d ‐amphetamine produced responding largely on the saline key under both reinforcement schedules. Under the FR schedule, pentobarbital dose–response curves were usually quantal, whereas under the FI schedule the pentobarbital dose–response curves usually were graded.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Behavioral economics of human drug self‐administration: progressive ratio versus random sequences of response requirements Effects of N ‐methyl‐ d ‐aspartate agonists and antagonists in rats discriminating amphetamine Interaction of morphine and naltrexone on oral ethanol self‐administration in rhesus monkeys Lack of effect of intravenous hydrocortisone on mood in humans: a preliminary study Short or continuous social stress: suppression of continuously available ethanol intake in subordinate rats
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1