《宪法》第51(xx)条规定的“贸易或金融公司”:多因素方法

Christopher Tran
{"title":"《宪法》第51(xx)条规定的“贸易或金融公司”:多因素方法","authors":"Christopher Tran","doi":"10.26180/5DB7FFA55D8A0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Commonwealth has legislative power with respect to 'trading or financial corporations' under s 51(xx) of the Constitution. An important question is thus how to identify a trading or financial corporation. For around 30 years, the accepted doctrine has been that a court looks at a corporation's activities. This article examines the justifications for and application of this activities test in the High Court and in recent lower court decisions. It argues that the activities test should be replaced by a multifactorial approach. Such an approach is more transparent and informative, and also better reflects what the courts actually do when deciding cases in this area.","PeriodicalId":44672,"journal":{"name":"Monash University Law Review","volume":"55 1","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'Trading or financial corporations' under section 51(xx) of the constitution: A multifactorial approach\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Tran\",\"doi\":\"10.26180/5DB7FFA55D8A0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Commonwealth has legislative power with respect to 'trading or financial corporations' under s 51(xx) of the Constitution. An important question is thus how to identify a trading or financial corporation. For around 30 years, the accepted doctrine has been that a court looks at a corporation's activities. This article examines the justifications for and application of this activities test in the High Court and in recent lower court decisions. It argues that the activities test should be replaced by a multifactorial approach. Such an approach is more transparent and informative, and also better reflects what the courts actually do when deciding cases in this area.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Monash University Law Review\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Monash University Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26180/5DB7FFA55D8A0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monash University Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26180/5DB7FFA55D8A0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

根据《宪法》第51(xx)条,联邦拥有关于“贸易或金融公司”的立法权。因此,一个重要的问题是如何确定贸易或金融公司。大约30年来,公认的原则一直是法院关注公司的活动。本文考察了高等法院和最近下级法院判决中这一行为检验的理由和适用。它认为活动测试应该被多因素方法所取代。这种方法更透明、更翔实,也更能反映法院在这方面的实际情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
'Trading or financial corporations' under section 51(xx) of the constitution: A multifactorial approach
The Commonwealth has legislative power with respect to 'trading or financial corporations' under s 51(xx) of the Constitution. An important question is thus how to identify a trading or financial corporation. For around 30 years, the accepted doctrine has been that a court looks at a corporation's activities. This article examines the justifications for and application of this activities test in the High Court and in recent lower court decisions. It argues that the activities test should be replaced by a multifactorial approach. Such an approach is more transparent and informative, and also better reflects what the courts actually do when deciding cases in this area.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Revisiting Section 32(1) of the Victorian Charter: strained constructions and legislative intention Peoplehood Obscured? The Normative Status of Self-Determination after the Chagos Advisory Opinion (Advance) Is the Wisdom of a Person's Decision Relevant to Their Capacity to Make That Decision? Not Black and White?: Disciplinary Regulation of Doctors Convicted of Child Pornography Offences in Australia Reconceptualising the Law of the Dead by Expanding the Interests of the Living
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1