社会企业的混合性如何影响其收入来源?

IF 2.8 Q2 BUSINESS Social Enterprise Journal Pub Date : 2021-10-28 DOI:10.1108/sej-02-2021-0010
Elizabeth A. M. Searing, Simone Poledrini, D. Young, M. Nyssens
{"title":"社会企业的混合性如何影响其收入来源?","authors":"Elizabeth A. M. Searing, Simone Poledrini, D. Young, M. Nyssens","doi":"10.1108/sej-02-2021-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to examine the applicability of the benefits theory of nonprofit finance to an international sample of social enterprises (SEs).\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis research analyzes the revenue sources of SEs through the lens of benefits theory. In particular, the authors test the links between revenue sources and the character of an enterprise’s mission. This study uses data on 545 SEs collected by the International Comparative Social Enterprise Models project, which was an international collaborative effort of more than 200 researchers. The authors use cross-sectional multivariate regression to identify the factors which influence the revenue portfolios of SEs.\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings provide evidence of SE revenue portfolios that are nuanced and complicated. Benefits theory helps to illuminate this nuance. The application of benefits theory to SE goes beyond the traditional characterization of the publicness and privateness of goods and services to include the intended beneficiaries, the nature of benefits they receive and the management practices followed to assure distribution of benefits to intended beneficiary groups. By analyzing the public (and private) goals of SEs, such as employment generation and food security, the authors gain an understanding of what they really do, and hence, how they can be best financed.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study provides empirical support to the applicability of benefits theory to SEs, which provides both theoretical advancement and practical implications.\n","PeriodicalId":46809,"journal":{"name":"Social Enterprise Journal","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The hybrid nature of social enterprises how does it affect their revenue sources?\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth A. M. Searing, Simone Poledrini, D. Young, M. Nyssens\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/sej-02-2021-0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis paper aims to examine the applicability of the benefits theory of nonprofit finance to an international sample of social enterprises (SEs).\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis research analyzes the revenue sources of SEs through the lens of benefits theory. In particular, the authors test the links between revenue sources and the character of an enterprise’s mission. This study uses data on 545 SEs collected by the International Comparative Social Enterprise Models project, which was an international collaborative effort of more than 200 researchers. The authors use cross-sectional multivariate regression to identify the factors which influence the revenue portfolios of SEs.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe findings provide evidence of SE revenue portfolios that are nuanced and complicated. Benefits theory helps to illuminate this nuance. The application of benefits theory to SE goes beyond the traditional characterization of the publicness and privateness of goods and services to include the intended beneficiaries, the nature of benefits they receive and the management practices followed to assure distribution of benefits to intended beneficiary groups. By analyzing the public (and private) goals of SEs, such as employment generation and food security, the authors gain an understanding of what they really do, and hence, how they can be best financed.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis study provides empirical support to the applicability of benefits theory to SEs, which provides both theoretical advancement and practical implications.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":46809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Enterprise Journal\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Enterprise Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/sej-02-2021-0010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Enterprise Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sej-02-2021-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的以国际社会企业为样本,考察非营利财务效益理论的适用性。设计/方法/途径本研究通过利益理论的视角分析了中小企业的收入来源。特别是,作者测试了收入来源和企业使命特征之间的联系。这项研究使用了国际比较社会企业模型项目收集的545家企业的数据,该项目是200多名研究人员的国际合作成果。本文采用横断面多元回归方法对影响中小企业收入组合的因素进行了分析。这些发现为中小企业的收入组合提供了微妙而复杂的证据。利益理论有助于阐明这种细微差别。利益理论在社会服务中的应用超越了商品和服务的公共性和私密性的传统特征,包括预期受益人,他们获得的利益的性质以及为确保将利益分配给预期受益群体而遵循的管理实践。通过分析中小企业的公共(和私人)目标,例如创造就业机会和粮食安全,作者了解了它们真正做什么,从而了解了如何最好地为它们提供资金。原创性/价值本研究为效益理论在中小企业中的适用性提供了实证支持,具有理论进步性和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The hybrid nature of social enterprises how does it affect their revenue sources?
Purpose This paper aims to examine the applicability of the benefits theory of nonprofit finance to an international sample of social enterprises (SEs). Design/methodology/approach This research analyzes the revenue sources of SEs through the lens of benefits theory. In particular, the authors test the links between revenue sources and the character of an enterprise’s mission. This study uses data on 545 SEs collected by the International Comparative Social Enterprise Models project, which was an international collaborative effort of more than 200 researchers. The authors use cross-sectional multivariate regression to identify the factors which influence the revenue portfolios of SEs. Findings The findings provide evidence of SE revenue portfolios that are nuanced and complicated. Benefits theory helps to illuminate this nuance. The application of benefits theory to SE goes beyond the traditional characterization of the publicness and privateness of goods and services to include the intended beneficiaries, the nature of benefits they receive and the management practices followed to assure distribution of benefits to intended beneficiary groups. By analyzing the public (and private) goals of SEs, such as employment generation and food security, the authors gain an understanding of what they really do, and hence, how they can be best financed. Originality/value This study provides empirical support to the applicability of benefits theory to SEs, which provides both theoretical advancement and practical implications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Tensions in work integration social enterprises in The Netherlands: balancing social and commercial goals in a multi-stakeholder context Heart and soul: business model innovation by a work-integration organization Roles of entrepreneurship competence in stimulating young generation to become social entrepreneurs in an emerging country Social entrepreneurship and rural development in post-independence Indonesia The dark side of impact measurement: complexities and drawbacks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1