运用层次分析法(AHP)和淘汰法选择最佳低成本航空公司(LCC)

Yuniar Farida, Husna Nur Laili, Achmad Teguh Wibowo, L. N. Desinaini, Silvia Kartika Sari
{"title":"运用层次分析法(AHP)和淘汰法选择最佳低成本航空公司(LCC)","authors":"Yuniar Farida, Husna Nur Laili, Achmad Teguh Wibowo, L. N. Desinaini, Silvia Kartika Sari","doi":"10.20473/jisebi.8.2.196-206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Low-cost carrier (LCC) is a popular air transportation service as it offers affordable fares. Many airlines have adopted the LCC system because they need to adapt to the changes in the airline industry. The competition is tight. Despite the low cost, consumers demand quality services. Therefore, LCC airlines need to find their competitive edge.\nObjective: This study aims to determine the best-performing LCC airlines, the criteria, and the sub-criteria to improve the performance.\nMethods: This study uses two methods from multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM), namely the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and elimination et choix traduisant la realite (ELECTRE) II. The MCDM is selected for this study because there are four criteria and 21 sub-criteria to evaluate airline performance. The AHP method selects subcriteria that affect airline customer satisfaction. It solves complex problems by establishing a hierarchy. After being assessed by relevant parties, weights or priorities are developed. The results are used to determine the best-performing airline. Meanwhile, the ELECTRE II method ranks the airline’s alternatives. This method is straightforward and widely used in the MCDM.\nResults: The results indicate that four criteria and 18 sub-criteria affect the performance of LCC airlines in Indonesia. The LCC airline with the best performance is AirAsia, followed by Citilink, Wings Air, and Lion Air.\nConclusion: This research integrates the AHP and ELECTRE II methods in evaluating the performance of LCC airlines. This research also provides information about the criteria and sub-criteria to improve airline performance, hence, the customer experience.","PeriodicalId":16185,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Business Intelligence","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selecting the Best-Performing Low-Cost Carrier (LCC) Airlines Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Elimination et Choix Traduisant la Realite (ELECTRE)\",\"authors\":\"Yuniar Farida, Husna Nur Laili, Achmad Teguh Wibowo, L. N. Desinaini, Silvia Kartika Sari\",\"doi\":\"10.20473/jisebi.8.2.196-206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Low-cost carrier (LCC) is a popular air transportation service as it offers affordable fares. Many airlines have adopted the LCC system because they need to adapt to the changes in the airline industry. The competition is tight. Despite the low cost, consumers demand quality services. Therefore, LCC airlines need to find their competitive edge.\\nObjective: This study aims to determine the best-performing LCC airlines, the criteria, and the sub-criteria to improve the performance.\\nMethods: This study uses two methods from multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM), namely the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and elimination et choix traduisant la realite (ELECTRE) II. The MCDM is selected for this study because there are four criteria and 21 sub-criteria to evaluate airline performance. The AHP method selects subcriteria that affect airline customer satisfaction. It solves complex problems by establishing a hierarchy. After being assessed by relevant parties, weights or priorities are developed. The results are used to determine the best-performing airline. Meanwhile, the ELECTRE II method ranks the airline’s alternatives. This method is straightforward and widely used in the MCDM.\\nResults: The results indicate that four criteria and 18 sub-criteria affect the performance of LCC airlines in Indonesia. The LCC airline with the best performance is AirAsia, followed by Citilink, Wings Air, and Lion Air.\\nConclusion: This research integrates the AHP and ELECTRE II methods in evaluating the performance of LCC airlines. This research also provides information about the criteria and sub-criteria to improve airline performance, hence, the customer experience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Business Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Business Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20473/jisebi.8.2.196-206\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Business Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/jisebi.8.2.196-206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:低成本航空公司(LCC)是一种受欢迎的航空运输服务,因为它提供负担得起的票价。许多航空公司都采用了低成本航空公司制度,因为他们需要适应航空业的变化。竞争很激烈。尽管成本低,但消费者需要高质量的服务。因此,低成本航空公司需要找到自己的竞争优势。目的:本研究旨在确定表现最佳的低成本航空公司,其标准,以及提高绩效的子标准。方法:本研究采用多准则决策(MCDM)中的两种方法,即层次分析法(AHP)和现实选择消除法(ELECTRE) II。本研究之所以选择MCDM,是因为有四个标准和21个子标准来评估航空公司的绩效。AHP方法选择影响航空公司客户满意度的子标准。它通过建立层级来解决复杂的问题。经有关各方评估后,制定权重或优先次序。这些结果被用来确定表现最好的航空公司。同时,ELECTRE II方法对航空公司的备选方案进行排名。该方法简单易行,在MCDM中得到广泛应用。结果:结果表明,印尼低成本航空公司的绩效受到4个标准和18个子标准的影响。表现最好的低成本航空公司是亚洲航空,其次是花旗航空、Wings航空和狮子航空。结论:本研究将AHP和ELECTRE II方法整合到低成本航空公司绩效评价中。这项研究还提供了有关标准和子标准的信息,以提高航空公司的业绩,从而提高客户体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Selecting the Best-Performing Low-Cost Carrier (LCC) Airlines Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Elimination et Choix Traduisant la Realite (ELECTRE)
Background: Low-cost carrier (LCC) is a popular air transportation service as it offers affordable fares. Many airlines have adopted the LCC system because they need to adapt to the changes in the airline industry. The competition is tight. Despite the low cost, consumers demand quality services. Therefore, LCC airlines need to find their competitive edge. Objective: This study aims to determine the best-performing LCC airlines, the criteria, and the sub-criteria to improve the performance. Methods: This study uses two methods from multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM), namely the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and elimination et choix traduisant la realite (ELECTRE) II. The MCDM is selected for this study because there are four criteria and 21 sub-criteria to evaluate airline performance. The AHP method selects subcriteria that affect airline customer satisfaction. It solves complex problems by establishing a hierarchy. After being assessed by relevant parties, weights or priorities are developed. The results are used to determine the best-performing airline. Meanwhile, the ELECTRE II method ranks the airline’s alternatives. This method is straightforward and widely used in the MCDM. Results: The results indicate that four criteria and 18 sub-criteria affect the performance of LCC airlines in Indonesia. The LCC airline with the best performance is AirAsia, followed by Citilink, Wings Air, and Lion Air. Conclusion: This research integrates the AHP and ELECTRE II methods in evaluating the performance of LCC airlines. This research also provides information about the criteria and sub-criteria to improve airline performance, hence, the customer experience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sentiment Analysis on a Large Indonesian Product Review Dataset Leveraging Biotic Interaction Knowledge Graph and Network Analysis to Uncover Insect Vectors of Plant Virus Model-based Decision Support System Using a System Dynamics Approach to Increase Corn Productivity Optimizing Support Vector Machine Performance for Parkinson's Disease Diagnosis Using GridSearchCV and PCA-Based Feature Extraction A Practical Approach to Enhance Data Quality Management in Government: Case Study of Indonesian Customs and Excise Office
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1