公共广播服务与新媒体技术:BBC做了什么和应该做什么

IF 1.7 3区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION Javnost-The Public Pub Date : 1997-01-01 DOI:10.1080/13183222.1997.11008661
P. Goodwin
{"title":"公共广播服务与新媒体技术:BBC做了什么和应该做什么","authors":"P. Goodwin","doi":"10.1080/13183222.1997.11008661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis article analyses the response of one of the world’s leading public service broadcasters to new media technologies ─ satellite, cable, digital broadcasting and interactive information technologies. It shows how and why the BBC has largely abandoned any serious attempt to exploit these for public purposes. It argues that the BBC’s attempts to exploit them for commercial purposes are both ineffective and threaten even its traditional public service remit. The article suggests that the BBC’s policies on new technology have contributed to a pervasive “common sense” in UK political debate that new technologies cannot be utilized for public service goals. The article takes issue with this “common sense” by demonstrating how generally accepted arguments for the continued validity of public service broadcasting apply equally to public service use of new technology. Finally, the article argues that an expanded notion of public service broadcasting cannot be divorced from a more general challenge to cur...","PeriodicalId":46298,"journal":{"name":"Javnost-The Public","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public Service Broadcasting and New Media Technology: What the BBC has Done and What it Should Have Done\",\"authors\":\"P. Goodwin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13183222.1997.11008661\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractThis article analyses the response of one of the world’s leading public service broadcasters to new media technologies ─ satellite, cable, digital broadcasting and interactive information technologies. It shows how and why the BBC has largely abandoned any serious attempt to exploit these for public purposes. It argues that the BBC’s attempts to exploit them for commercial purposes are both ineffective and threaten even its traditional public service remit. The article suggests that the BBC’s policies on new technology have contributed to a pervasive “common sense” in UK political debate that new technologies cannot be utilized for public service goals. The article takes issue with this “common sense” by demonstrating how generally accepted arguments for the continued validity of public service broadcasting apply equally to public service use of new technology. Finally, the article argues that an expanded notion of public service broadcasting cannot be divorced from a more general challenge to cur...\",\"PeriodicalId\":46298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Javnost-The Public\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Javnost-The Public\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.1997.11008661\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Javnost-The Public","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.1997.11008661","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

摘要本文分析了一家世界领先的公共服务广播公司对卫星、有线、数字广播和交互式信息技术等新媒体技术的反应。它显示了BBC是如何以及为什么在很大程度上放弃了利用这些资源来达到公共目的的任何严肃尝试。它认为BBC试图利用它们来达到商业目的是无效的,甚至威胁到其传统的公共服务职责。这篇文章表明,BBC在新技术方面的政策促成了英国政治辩论中普遍存在的“常识”,即新技术不能用于公共服务目标。这篇文章对这种“常识”提出了质疑,论证了公共服务广播的持续有效性如何被普遍接受,同样适用于公共服务对新技术的使用。最后,文章认为,公共服务广播的扩展概念不能与更普遍的挑战割裂开来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Public Service Broadcasting and New Media Technology: What the BBC has Done and What it Should Have Done
AbstractThis article analyses the response of one of the world’s leading public service broadcasters to new media technologies ─ satellite, cable, digital broadcasting and interactive information technologies. It shows how and why the BBC has largely abandoned any serious attempt to exploit these for public purposes. It argues that the BBC’s attempts to exploit them for commercial purposes are both ineffective and threaten even its traditional public service remit. The article suggests that the BBC’s policies on new technology have contributed to a pervasive “common sense” in UK political debate that new technologies cannot be utilized for public service goals. The article takes issue with this “common sense” by demonstrating how generally accepted arguments for the continued validity of public service broadcasting apply equally to public service use of new technology. Finally, the article argues that an expanded notion of public service broadcasting cannot be divorced from a more general challenge to cur...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Javnost-The Public
Javnost-The Public COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Javnost - The Public, an interdisciplinary peer-reviewed social and cultural science journal published by the European Institute for Communication and Culture in association with the Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana, addresses problems of the public sphere on international and interdisciplinary levels. It encourages the development of theory and research, and helps understand differences between cultures. Contributors confront problems of the public, public communication, public opinion, public discourse, publicness, publicity, and public life from a variety of disciplinary and theoretical perspectives.
期刊最新文献
Not Forgetting Black Lives Matter: Memory, Protest and Counterpublics Public Service Media in Northern Ireland: Prominence and Vulnerability in a Small Media System Counterpublics and Structural Change in Media and Politics: A Theoretical Framework on Transformations within a Long-Term Historical Perspective Anti-Systemic Counterpublics: Rethinking the Counterpublic Sphere Far Right > Digital Rights: The Precarity of Free Expression, Internet Access, Net Neutrality and Data Privacy in Bolsonaro’s Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1