世界航空工业的变化:技术效率分析

IF 0.3 4区 工程技术 Q4 ECONOMICS International Journal of Transport Economics Pub Date : 2004-10-01 DOI:10.1400/16921
P. Coto-Millán, A. Rodríguez-Álvarez, B. R. Legidos, V. Inglada
{"title":"世界航空工业的变化:技术效率分析","authors":"P. Coto-Millán, A. Rodríguez-Álvarez, B. R. Legidos, V. Inglada","doi":"10.1400/16921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reports on a study that compares technical efficiency in a sample of 19 international airline companies (1992-2000), focusing on changes in technical efficiency that may have occurred as a result of the restructuring of the industry after liberalization (deregulation and privatization) in air transport. The authors first review the methodology used to make the estimations (based on the stochastic model of Battese and Coelli, 1995), then describe the variables and data found. The authors then discuss economic specifications and the functional forms chosen, outline the results of the estimation, and discuss their conclusions. The results show that there has been an improvement in efficiency during the study period. American and Asian companies are found to be most efficient, along with some European countries such as Lufthansa. The authors caution that there are still some markets which are operated under regulatory regimes; in Europe, there are also companies with public ownership.","PeriodicalId":44910,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Transport Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2004-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CHANGES IN THE WORLD AIR INDUSTRY: AN ANALYSIS OF TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY\",\"authors\":\"P. Coto-Millán, A. Rodríguez-Álvarez, B. R. Legidos, V. Inglada\",\"doi\":\"10.1400/16921\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article reports on a study that compares technical efficiency in a sample of 19 international airline companies (1992-2000), focusing on changes in technical efficiency that may have occurred as a result of the restructuring of the industry after liberalization (deregulation and privatization) in air transport. The authors first review the methodology used to make the estimations (based on the stochastic model of Battese and Coelli, 1995), then describe the variables and data found. The authors then discuss economic specifications and the functional forms chosen, outline the results of the estimation, and discuss their conclusions. The results show that there has been an improvement in efficiency during the study period. American and Asian companies are found to be most efficient, along with some European countries such as Lufthansa. The authors caution that there are still some markets which are operated under regulatory regimes; in Europe, there are also companies with public ownership.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Transport Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Transport Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1400/16921\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Transport Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1400/16921","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文报告了一项研究,比较了19家国际航空公司(1992-2000)的技术效率样本,重点关注技术效率的变化,这可能是由于航空运输自由化(放松管制和私有化)后行业重组的结果。作者首先回顾了用于进行估计的方法(基于Battese和Coelli, 1995年的随机模型),然后描述了发现的变量和数据。然后,作者讨论了经济规格和选择的功能形式,概述了估计的结果,并讨论了他们的结论。结果表明,在研究期间,效率有所提高。研究发现,美国和亚洲的公司以及一些欧洲国家的公司(如汉莎航空公司)效率最高。作者警告说,仍有一些市场是在监管制度下运作的;在欧洲,也有国有公司。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CHANGES IN THE WORLD AIR INDUSTRY: AN ANALYSIS OF TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY
This article reports on a study that compares technical efficiency in a sample of 19 international airline companies (1992-2000), focusing on changes in technical efficiency that may have occurred as a result of the restructuring of the industry after liberalization (deregulation and privatization) in air transport. The authors first review the methodology used to make the estimations (based on the stochastic model of Battese and Coelli, 1995), then describe the variables and data found. The authors then discuss economic specifications and the functional forms chosen, outline the results of the estimation, and discuss their conclusions. The results show that there has been an improvement in efficiency during the study period. American and Asian companies are found to be most efficient, along with some European countries such as Lufthansa. The authors caution that there are still some markets which are operated under regulatory regimes; in Europe, there are also companies with public ownership.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
E-Commerce and the Last Mile in Urban Goods Distribution: Criticalities and the Need for Change Can process and lean thinking optimize order picking performance Combined optimization methodology for operational planning and service policies: a case study of urban ropeway transport An Analysis of Inverse of Airport Choice Leakage in China Multi-Airport Regions Statistical analysis of Texas state highways' cost indices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1