COVID-19大流行期间现场检测与在线检测的比较

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Advanced Education Pub Date : 2021-06-22 DOI:10.20535/2410-8286.229264
Eva Stradiotová, Ildikó Némethová, R. Štefančík
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间现场检测与在线检测的比较","authors":"Eva Stradiotová, Ildikó Némethová, R. Štefančík","doi":"10.20535/2410-8286.229264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the paper, we deal with the comparison of the evaluation of students' language skills in two environments, on-site and online. Testing took place through the moodle platform, where we used e-test, during the first and second waves of the pandemic. The main aim of the research was to find out what impact the environment in which the testing takes place has on the test results, i.e. in which environment students achieved better results. Printed tests were used for on-site testing. The on-site testing took place in the academic years 2018/2019 (summer term) and 2019/2020 (winter term). The online testing took place in the academic years 2019/2020 (summer term) and 2020/2021 (winter term). We compared the results of the testing, which took place in person at the university, with the results that the students achieved during the online testing. In the research of testing, we used the method of quantitative analysis and descriptive statistics, which allow us to better understand the correlation between the results obtained in on-site and online testing. Based on the data analysis, we confirmed the alternative hypothesis H1: Students who took part in on-site testing achieve better results than students who took part in online testing. Testing results show that students achieve better results in on-site testing than in online testing.\n ","PeriodicalId":43037,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARISON OF ON-SITE TESTING WITH ONLINE TESTING DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC\",\"authors\":\"Eva Stradiotová, Ildikó Némethová, R. Štefančík\",\"doi\":\"10.20535/2410-8286.229264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the paper, we deal with the comparison of the evaluation of students' language skills in two environments, on-site and online. Testing took place through the moodle platform, where we used e-test, during the first and second waves of the pandemic. The main aim of the research was to find out what impact the environment in which the testing takes place has on the test results, i.e. in which environment students achieved better results. Printed tests were used for on-site testing. The on-site testing took place in the academic years 2018/2019 (summer term) and 2019/2020 (winter term). The online testing took place in the academic years 2019/2020 (summer term) and 2020/2021 (winter term). We compared the results of the testing, which took place in person at the university, with the results that the students achieved during the online testing. In the research of testing, we used the method of quantitative analysis and descriptive statistics, which allow us to better understand the correlation between the results obtained in on-site and online testing. Based on the data analysis, we confirmed the alternative hypothesis H1: Students who took part in on-site testing achieve better results than students who took part in online testing. Testing results show that students achieve better results in on-site testing than in online testing.\\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":43037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advanced Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advanced Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.229264\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.229264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

在本文中,我们对现场和网络两种环境下的学生语言技能评价进行了比较。在大流行的第一波和第二波期间,通过moodle平台进行了测试,我们在该平台上使用了电子测试。研究的主要目的是找出测试发生的环境对测试结果的影响,即学生在哪种环境中取得更好的成绩。打印的测试用于现场测试。现场测试分别在2018/2019学年(夏季学期)和2019/2020学年(冬季学期)进行。在线测试在2019/2020学年(夏季学期)和2020/2021学年(冬季学期)进行。我们将在大学里亲自进行的测试结果与学生在在线测试中获得的结果进行了比较。在测试的研究中,我们使用了定量分析和描述性统计的方法,使我们能够更好地了解现场测试结果与在线测试结果之间的相关性。根据数据分析,我们确认了备选假设H1:参加现场测试的学生比参加在线测试的学生取得了更好的成绩。测试结果表明,学生在现场测试中取得了比在线测试更好的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COMPARISON OF ON-SITE TESTING WITH ONLINE TESTING DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC
In the paper, we deal with the comparison of the evaluation of students' language skills in two environments, on-site and online. Testing took place through the moodle platform, where we used e-test, during the first and second waves of the pandemic. The main aim of the research was to find out what impact the environment in which the testing takes place has on the test results, i.e. in which environment students achieved better results. Printed tests were used for on-site testing. The on-site testing took place in the academic years 2018/2019 (summer term) and 2019/2020 (winter term). The online testing took place in the academic years 2019/2020 (summer term) and 2020/2021 (winter term). We compared the results of the testing, which took place in person at the university, with the results that the students achieved during the online testing. In the research of testing, we used the method of quantitative analysis and descriptive statistics, which allow us to better understand the correlation between the results obtained in on-site and online testing. Based on the data analysis, we confirmed the alternative hypothesis H1: Students who took part in on-site testing achieve better results than students who took part in online testing. Testing results show that students achieve better results in on-site testing than in online testing.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advanced Education
Advanced Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
27.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
TEACHING PRACTICES IN THE NEW NORMAL: QUALITATIVE INQUIRY (SRI LANKA CASE) AWARENESS LEVELS OF SOCIAL STUDIES PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS REGARDING METAVERSE USE TRANSLATION AND TEACHING OF CLASSICAL ANCIENT GREEK LITERATURE IN UKRAINE: CULTURAL INFLUENCE AND HISTORICAL DIMENSION SELF-PERCEIVED EFFICACY OF MENTOR TEACHERS EFFECT OF QUIZLET USE ON UKRAINIAN SERVICE MEMBERS’ ENGLISH VOCABULARY ACQUISITION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1