检察官在仲裁程序中的法律地位

E. Mikhailova
{"title":"检察官在仲裁程序中的法律地位","authors":"E. Mikhailova","doi":"10.31857/s102694520026148-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the legal position of the prosecutor in the system of participants in arbitration proceedings. Based on the analysis of the nature of arbitration proceedings and civil cases considered by arbitration courts, it was concluded that, despite the consolidation of the independent constitutional status of arbitration proceedings as a separate procedural form of protection, it is still impossible to draw a clear distinction between civil and arbitration proceedings. Both in civil and in arbitration proceedings, both private law and public law disputed legal relations are the subject of judicial activity. This circumstance determines the commonality of the goals and objectives of civil and arbitration proceedings, which directly affects the procedural status of the persons involved in the case. The prosecutor traditionally treats the legislator to the persons participating in the case, both in civil and in arbitration proceedings. A retrospective look at Russian procedural legislation led to the conclusion that it is necessary to maintain the supervisory function of the prosecutor not only in civil, but also in arbitration proceedings. The truncated powers of the prosecutor in the arbitration process do not correspond to the tasks he performs in the field of civil jurisdiction, and it is proposed to expand them in a number of areas.","PeriodicalId":82769,"journal":{"name":"Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legal status of the prosecutor in arbitration proceedings\",\"authors\":\"E. Mikhailova\",\"doi\":\"10.31857/s102694520026148-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article examines the legal position of the prosecutor in the system of participants in arbitration proceedings. Based on the analysis of the nature of arbitration proceedings and civil cases considered by arbitration courts, it was concluded that, despite the consolidation of the independent constitutional status of arbitration proceedings as a separate procedural form of protection, it is still impossible to draw a clear distinction between civil and arbitration proceedings. Both in civil and in arbitration proceedings, both private law and public law disputed legal relations are the subject of judicial activity. This circumstance determines the commonality of the goals and objectives of civil and arbitration proceedings, which directly affects the procedural status of the persons involved in the case. The prosecutor traditionally treats the legislator to the persons participating in the case, both in civil and in arbitration proceedings. A retrospective look at Russian procedural legislation led to the conclusion that it is necessary to maintain the supervisory function of the prosecutor not only in civil, but also in arbitration proceedings. The truncated powers of the prosecutor in the arbitration process do not correspond to the tasks he performs in the field of civil jurisdiction, and it is proposed to expand them in a number of areas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":82769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31857/s102694520026148-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31857/s102694520026148-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了检察官在仲裁诉讼参与人制度中的法律地位。根据对仲裁程序和仲裁法院审议的民事案件的性质的分析,得出的结论是,尽管仲裁程序作为一种单独的程序保护形式的独立宪法地位得到巩固,但仍然不可能明确区分民事程序和仲裁程序。无论是民事诉讼还是仲裁诉讼,无论是私法争议还是公法争议的法律关系都是司法活动的主体。这种情况决定了民事诉讼与仲裁诉讼目的的共同性,直接影响到当事人的诉讼地位。传统上,检察官将立法者视为参与民事和仲裁诉讼的人。回顾俄罗斯的诉讼立法,得出的结论是,不仅在民事诉讼中,而且在仲裁诉讼中,都有必要保持检察官的监督职能。检察官在仲裁程序中被削减的权力与其在民事管辖领域所执行的任务不相符,建议在若干领域扩大检察官的权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Legal status of the prosecutor in arbitration proceedings
The article examines the legal position of the prosecutor in the system of participants in arbitration proceedings. Based on the analysis of the nature of arbitration proceedings and civil cases considered by arbitration courts, it was concluded that, despite the consolidation of the independent constitutional status of arbitration proceedings as a separate procedural form of protection, it is still impossible to draw a clear distinction between civil and arbitration proceedings. Both in civil and in arbitration proceedings, both private law and public law disputed legal relations are the subject of judicial activity. This circumstance determines the commonality of the goals and objectives of civil and arbitration proceedings, which directly affects the procedural status of the persons involved in the case. The prosecutor traditionally treats the legislator to the persons participating in the case, both in civil and in arbitration proceedings. A retrospective look at Russian procedural legislation led to the conclusion that it is necessary to maintain the supervisory function of the prosecutor not only in civil, but also in arbitration proceedings. The truncated powers of the prosecutor in the arbitration process do not correspond to the tasks he performs in the field of civil jurisdiction, and it is proposed to expand them in a number of areas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Legal protection and rational use of geological heritage in geoparks The Russian system of pre-trial proceedings as a synthesis of different types of criminal procedure Legal regulation circulation of digital rights in United States of America Feignfullness prohibition: administrative and legal research with elements of an economic approach The first Criminal Code of Soviet Russia and the responsibility of professional criminals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1