利他主义与转移悖论

Kojun Hamada
{"title":"利他主义与转移悖论","authors":"Kojun Hamada","doi":"10.5652/INTERNATIONALECONOMY.IE2012.08.K.H","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper examines whether altruism causes the transfer paradox in the model with two countries and two goods. Unlike the existing literature on the subject in which the people in the donor country maximize their own utility and do not care about the people in the recipient country, we analyze a situation in which the consumers of the donor and recipient countries have altruistic utility. We demonstrate that if the Walrasian stability condition is satisfied in the general equilibrium, the transfer paradox can never take place irrespective of the definition of utility. The result suggests that the motivation for transfer cannot be explained by the donor’s enrichment because it is not caused by the introduction of altruism into the model.","PeriodicalId":22492,"journal":{"name":"The International economy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Altruism and the Transfer Paradox\",\"authors\":\"Kojun Hamada\",\"doi\":\"10.5652/INTERNATIONALECONOMY.IE2012.08.K.H\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper examines whether altruism causes the transfer paradox in the model with two countries and two goods. Unlike the existing literature on the subject in which the people in the donor country maximize their own utility and do not care about the people in the recipient country, we analyze a situation in which the consumers of the donor and recipient countries have altruistic utility. We demonstrate that if the Walrasian stability condition is satisfied in the general equilibrium, the transfer paradox can never take place irrespective of the definition of utility. The result suggests that the motivation for transfer cannot be explained by the donor’s enrichment because it is not caused by the introduction of altruism into the model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International economy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5652/INTERNATIONALECONOMY.IE2012.08.K.H\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5652/INTERNATIONALECONOMY.IE2012.08.K.H","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了两国两品模型中是否存在利他主义导致的转移悖论。与现有文献中关于援助国人民最大化自己的效用而不关心受援国人民的问题不同,我们分析了援助国和受援国的消费者都具有利他效用的情况。我们证明了在一般均衡中,如果瓦尔拉斯稳定条件满足,无论效用的定义如何,转移悖论都不会发生。结果表明,转移的动机不能用捐赠者的富裕来解释,因为它不是由利他主义引入模型引起的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Altruism and the Transfer Paradox
The paper examines whether altruism causes the transfer paradox in the model with two countries and two goods. Unlike the existing literature on the subject in which the people in the donor country maximize their own utility and do not care about the people in the recipient country, we analyze a situation in which the consumers of the donor and recipient countries have altruistic utility. We demonstrate that if the Walrasian stability condition is satisfied in the general equilibrium, the transfer paradox can never take place irrespective of the definition of utility. The result suggests that the motivation for transfer cannot be explained by the donor’s enrichment because it is not caused by the introduction of altruism into the model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Border Carbon Adjustments: An Overview of Institutions and Theoretical Analysis ◇コメント◇ 新興国ブラジルの農業・食料分野にみられるリスクとその対応 Comments on the paper by S. Sano Inclusive Wealth, Trade, and COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1