地图教育需要认识论吗?巴西学校制图的传统和转变

IF 0.1 Q4 GEOGRAPHY Perspectiva Geografica Pub Date : 2022-11-10 DOI:10.5007/2175-795x.2022.e83989
J. Seemann
{"title":"地图教育需要认识论吗?巴西学校制图的传统和转变","authors":"J. Seemann","doi":"10.5007/2175-795x.2022.e83989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Knowledge philosophies have been a constant theme in cartography for the last three decades and have resulted in a lively debate on a variety of approaches (modern, postmodern post-processual and post-representational) in the field. These discussions have not had a significant impact on theories and methodologies in cartographic education. Teaching about and with maps embraces well-established ideas, but is reticent to accept alternative modes. This article seeks to analyze cartographic views and epistemologies in the context of school cartography in Brazil in order to point out traditions, transitions and trends that consolidate easy-to-follow principles, but may curb a diversity of approaches in the subfield at the same time. I argue that teaching with maps requires a broader debate about adjustments and innovations beyond the taken-for-granted standards. For this purpose, I will briefly discuss epistemologies in the context of scientific cartography and then, based on the existent substantial bibliography on cartographic education in Brazil, outline specific traditions that have laid the foundations for today’s school cartography in the country. Obstacles and challenges for the development and improvement in teaching are identified, with the intention to rethink common practices and experiment alternative or complementary forms and modes in the classroom. The revision and reformulation of specific principles, concepts and themes can strengthen an inclusive, diversified and pluralistic vision in cartographic education that can serve as a useful tool for citizenship cartography in Brazil.","PeriodicalId":40693,"journal":{"name":"Perspectiva Geografica","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does cartographic education need an epistemology? Traditions and transitions in Brazilian school cartography\",\"authors\":\"J. Seemann\",\"doi\":\"10.5007/2175-795x.2022.e83989\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Knowledge philosophies have been a constant theme in cartography for the last three decades and have resulted in a lively debate on a variety of approaches (modern, postmodern post-processual and post-representational) in the field. These discussions have not had a significant impact on theories and methodologies in cartographic education. Teaching about and with maps embraces well-established ideas, but is reticent to accept alternative modes. This article seeks to analyze cartographic views and epistemologies in the context of school cartography in Brazil in order to point out traditions, transitions and trends that consolidate easy-to-follow principles, but may curb a diversity of approaches in the subfield at the same time. I argue that teaching with maps requires a broader debate about adjustments and innovations beyond the taken-for-granted standards. For this purpose, I will briefly discuss epistemologies in the context of scientific cartography and then, based on the existent substantial bibliography on cartographic education in Brazil, outline specific traditions that have laid the foundations for today’s school cartography in the country. Obstacles and challenges for the development and improvement in teaching are identified, with the intention to rethink common practices and experiment alternative or complementary forms and modes in the classroom. The revision and reformulation of specific principles, concepts and themes can strengthen an inclusive, diversified and pluralistic vision in cartographic education that can serve as a useful tool for citizenship cartography in Brazil.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectiva Geografica\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectiva Geografica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-795x.2022.e83989\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectiva Geografica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-795x.2022.e83989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的三十年里,知识哲学一直是地图学的一个恒定主题,并在该领域引发了关于各种方法(现代、后现代、后过程和后代表)的激烈辩论。这些讨论并没有对地图学教育的理论和方法产生重大影响。关于地图和与地图相关的教学包含了一些成熟的观点,但不愿接受其他模式。本文旨在分析巴西学校地图学背景下的制图观点和认识论,以指出传统、转变和趋势,这些传统、转变和趋势巩固了易于遵循的原则,但同时也可能抑制子领域中方法的多样性。我认为,地图教学需要更广泛地讨论调整和创新,而不是想当然的标准。为此,我将简要讨论科学制图背景下的认识论,然后,基于巴西制图教育的现有大量参考书目,概述为该国今天的学校制图奠定基础的具体传统。确定了教学发展和改进的障碍和挑战,意图重新思考常见的做法,并在课堂上尝试替代或互补的形式和模式。修订和重新制定具体原则、概念和主题可以加强制图教育的包容、多样化和多元化愿景,从而成为巴西公民制图工作的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does cartographic education need an epistemology? Traditions and transitions in Brazilian school cartography
Knowledge philosophies have been a constant theme in cartography for the last three decades and have resulted in a lively debate on a variety of approaches (modern, postmodern post-processual and post-representational) in the field. These discussions have not had a significant impact on theories and methodologies in cartographic education. Teaching about and with maps embraces well-established ideas, but is reticent to accept alternative modes. This article seeks to analyze cartographic views and epistemologies in the context of school cartography in Brazil in order to point out traditions, transitions and trends that consolidate easy-to-follow principles, but may curb a diversity of approaches in the subfield at the same time. I argue that teaching with maps requires a broader debate about adjustments and innovations beyond the taken-for-granted standards. For this purpose, I will briefly discuss epistemologies in the context of scientific cartography and then, based on the existent substantial bibliography on cartographic education in Brazil, outline specific traditions that have laid the foundations for today’s school cartography in the country. Obstacles and challenges for the development and improvement in teaching are identified, with the intention to rethink common practices and experiment alternative or complementary forms and modes in the classroom. The revision and reformulation of specific principles, concepts and themes can strengthen an inclusive, diversified and pluralistic vision in cartographic education that can serve as a useful tool for citizenship cartography in Brazil.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
33 weeks
期刊最新文献
Leitura na perspectiva de educadoras que atuam na educação infantil em Nova Prata Da educação infantil ao ensino fundamental: a transição escolar na percepção de professores de educação física Avaliação da percepção dos professores de escolas estaduais pertencentes à coordenadoria regional de educação de Criciúma sobre o novo ensino médio Linguagens estéticas em práticas decoloniais: experiência e iniciação à docência em espanhol A análise crítica de necessidades para línguas adicionais na educação indígena: um exemplo brasileiro
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1