媒体、公共学术与宗教争议:来自特朗普时代美国的笔记

S. Hoover
{"title":"媒体、公共学术与宗教争议:来自特朗普时代美国的笔记","authors":"S. Hoover","doi":"10.1163/21659214-00801008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe persistence of religion in the twenty-first century has renewed the importance of scholarships devoted to it. At the same time, the digital age has re-positioned and recentered the affordances of mediated circulations around \"the religious.\" This increasing presence and significance of media and religion suggests that substantive scholarships of religion must necessarily articulate media as well. Religious controversies therefore present a special challenge and a special opportunity to scholarships of media and religion. New ways of doing scholarship, and doing so publicly, present themselves. All scholarships of mediated religion must necessarily be public, so scholarship is articulated into these circulations, and at the same time can build on and benefit from knowledge-building that occurs outside the formal boundaries of the academy. This paper explores emerging theories of digital mediation and proposes a circulation-focused understanding of the role, place, and potentials of scholarships today.","PeriodicalId":29881,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Religion Media and Digital Culture","volume":"157 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Media, Public Scholarship and Religious Controversy: Notes from Trump’s America\",\"authors\":\"S. Hoover\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/21659214-00801008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThe persistence of religion in the twenty-first century has renewed the importance of scholarships devoted to it. At the same time, the digital age has re-positioned and recentered the affordances of mediated circulations around \\\"the religious.\\\" This increasing presence and significance of media and religion suggests that substantive scholarships of religion must necessarily articulate media as well. Religious controversies therefore present a special challenge and a special opportunity to scholarships of media and religion. New ways of doing scholarship, and doing so publicly, present themselves. All scholarships of mediated religion must necessarily be public, so scholarship is articulated into these circulations, and at the same time can build on and benefit from knowledge-building that occurs outside the formal boundaries of the academy. This paper explores emerging theories of digital mediation and proposes a circulation-focused understanding of the role, place, and potentials of scholarships today.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Religion Media and Digital Culture\",\"volume\":\"157 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Religion Media and Digital Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/21659214-00801008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Religion Media and Digital Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/21659214-00801008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

宗教在21世纪的持续存在使专门研究宗教的奖学金重新显得重要起来。与此同时,数字时代重新定位和重新定位了围绕“宗教”的媒介流通的便利。媒体和宗教日益增加的存在和重要性表明,实质性的宗教奖学金也必须与媒体联系起来。因此,宗教争议对媒体和宗教奖学金提出了特殊的挑战和特殊的机遇。开展学术研究的新方式,以及公开开展学术研究的新方式,出现了。所有中介宗教的奖学金都必须是公开的,所以奖学金是与这些流通联系在一起的,同时可以建立在学术正式界限之外的知识建设上并从中受益。本文探讨了数字中介的新兴理论,并提出了一种以流通为中心的对当今奖学金的作用、地位和潜力的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Media, Public Scholarship and Religious Controversy: Notes from Trump’s America
The persistence of religion in the twenty-first century has renewed the importance of scholarships devoted to it. At the same time, the digital age has re-positioned and recentered the affordances of mediated circulations around "the religious." This increasing presence and significance of media and religion suggests that substantive scholarships of religion must necessarily articulate media as well. Religious controversies therefore present a special challenge and a special opportunity to scholarships of media and religion. New ways of doing scholarship, and doing so publicly, present themselves. All scholarships of mediated religion must necessarily be public, so scholarship is articulated into these circulations, and at the same time can build on and benefit from knowledge-building that occurs outside the formal boundaries of the academy. This paper explores emerging theories of digital mediation and proposes a circulation-focused understanding of the role, place, and potentials of scholarships today.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
#ChristianCheck: TikTok and the Construction of Generation Z Faith “To Me, Religion is like Paul Rudd”. Popularising Secularities and Nonreligion in Contemporary US Seriality TikTok Cultures in the United States, edited by Trevor Boffone What Style Guides Tell Secular Journalists about Muslims and Islam Media and the Formation of Secular/Religious Networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1