作为制度领域的数字生态系统:策划同行生产,以应对COVID - 19所揭示的制度空白

IF 6.7 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS R&D Management Pub Date : 2022-09-05 DOI:10.1111/radm.12555
Soumodip Sarkar, Anna Waldman-Brown, S. Clegg
{"title":"作为制度领域的数字生态系统:策划同行生产,以应对COVID - 19所揭示的制度空白","authors":"Soumodip Sarkar, Anna Waldman-Brown, S. Clegg","doi":"10.1111/radm.12555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the ecosystem dynamics of the Open‐source [COVID‐19] Medical Supplies network that arose to fill the institutional void revealed by state and private sector failures to stockpile and supply enough personal protective equipment. Theoretically, the paper adds correctives to extant institutional theory accounts of entrepreneurship filling institutional voids, showing that these can be filled rapidly and normatively by digital entrepreneurial ecosystems allied with peer production networks. These were able to transform the boundary conditions of a routinized system, refixing its autopoiesis innovatively. The COVID‐19 epidemic galvanized hundreds of thousands of volunteer “makers” around the world to cooperate to meet urgent demand for medical supplies. A digital entrepreneurial ecosystem arose in response to the problem of critical equipment shortages, connecting global, expert‐curated know‐how with local production equipment. We contribute to the theory of institutional voids by documenting and analyzing how the formation and emergent processes that created and sustained a Digital Peer Production Ecosystem based on self‐organization, expert curation and scalability, successfully catalyzed local initiatives worldwide. Institutional voids are not just barriers to entrepreneurship; they are also opportunities.","PeriodicalId":21040,"journal":{"name":"R&D Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A digital ecosystem as an institutional field: curated peer production as a response to institutional voids revealed by COVID‐19\",\"authors\":\"Soumodip Sarkar, Anna Waldman-Brown, S. Clegg\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/radm.12555\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates the ecosystem dynamics of the Open‐source [COVID‐19] Medical Supplies network that arose to fill the institutional void revealed by state and private sector failures to stockpile and supply enough personal protective equipment. Theoretically, the paper adds correctives to extant institutional theory accounts of entrepreneurship filling institutional voids, showing that these can be filled rapidly and normatively by digital entrepreneurial ecosystems allied with peer production networks. These were able to transform the boundary conditions of a routinized system, refixing its autopoiesis innovatively. The COVID‐19 epidemic galvanized hundreds of thousands of volunteer “makers” around the world to cooperate to meet urgent demand for medical supplies. A digital entrepreneurial ecosystem arose in response to the problem of critical equipment shortages, connecting global, expert‐curated know‐how with local production equipment. We contribute to the theory of institutional voids by documenting and analyzing how the formation and emergent processes that created and sustained a Digital Peer Production Ecosystem based on self‐organization, expert curation and scalability, successfully catalyzed local initiatives worldwide. Institutional voids are not just barriers to entrepreneurship; they are also opportunities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"R&D Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"R&D Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12555\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"R&D Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12555","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文研究了开源[COVID - 19]医疗用品网络的生态系统动态,该网络填补了国家和私营部门未能储存和供应足够的个人防护装备所揭示的制度空白。从理论上讲,本文对现有的关于企业家精神填补制度空白的制度理论进行了修正,表明这些空白可以通过与对等生产网络相结合的数字创业生态系统快速而规范地填补。这些能够改变常规系统的边界条件,创新地修复其自创生。COVID - 19疫情激发了世界各地数十万志愿者“制造者”的合作,以满足对医疗用品的紧急需求。为了应对关键设备短缺的问题,数字创业生态系统应运而生,将全球专家策划的专有技术与当地生产设备联系起来。我们通过记录和分析创建和维持基于自组织、专家管理和可扩展性的数字对等生产生态系统的形成和紧急过程,成功地催化了全球范围内的地方倡议,从而为制度空白理论做出了贡献。制度空白不仅是创业的障碍;它们也是机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A digital ecosystem as an institutional field: curated peer production as a response to institutional voids revealed by COVID‐19
This paper investigates the ecosystem dynamics of the Open‐source [COVID‐19] Medical Supplies network that arose to fill the institutional void revealed by state and private sector failures to stockpile and supply enough personal protective equipment. Theoretically, the paper adds correctives to extant institutional theory accounts of entrepreneurship filling institutional voids, showing that these can be filled rapidly and normatively by digital entrepreneurial ecosystems allied with peer production networks. These were able to transform the boundary conditions of a routinized system, refixing its autopoiesis innovatively. The COVID‐19 epidemic galvanized hundreds of thousands of volunteer “makers” around the world to cooperate to meet urgent demand for medical supplies. A digital entrepreneurial ecosystem arose in response to the problem of critical equipment shortages, connecting global, expert‐curated know‐how with local production equipment. We contribute to the theory of institutional voids by documenting and analyzing how the formation and emergent processes that created and sustained a Digital Peer Production Ecosystem based on self‐organization, expert curation and scalability, successfully catalyzed local initiatives worldwide. Institutional voids are not just barriers to entrepreneurship; they are also opportunities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
R&D Management
R&D Management Multiple-
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: R&D Management journal publishes articles which address the interests of both practising managers and academic researchers in research and development and innovation management. Covering the full range of topics in research, development, design and innovation, and related strategic and human resource issues - from exploratory science to commercial exploitation - articles also examine social, economic and environmental implications.
期刊最新文献
Roles of big data analytics and organizational culture in developing innovation capabilities: a hybrid PLS‐fsQCA approach Research, patents, and IPO valuation under the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002 A Research Agenda for Workplace Innovation: The Challenge of Disruptive Transitions. Edited by Peter R. A.Oeij, StevenDhondt, Adela J.McMurray, Edgar Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, 2023, 978‐1‐80088‐193‐8, hardback, £115.49, pp. 304. The relationship between digital technologies and the circular economy: a systematic literature review and a research agenda Evolutionary Ideas: Unlocking Ancient Innovation to Solve Tomorrow's Challenges. By SamTatam, Harriman House Publishing: Hampshire, 2022, ISBN 978‐0‐85719‐787‐0, paperback, £9.99, pp. 240.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1