布比卡因-右美托咪定混合物与单独布比卡因在上肢骨手术中的术中镇静和术后镇痛效果:越南的一项随机比较研究

Q4 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Pharmaceutical Sciences Asia Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.29090/psa.2022.03.21.184
Nhung Tran, Khanh Hoang Pham, Thang Nguyen, Dao Huynh Tran, Hung Xuan Tong, C. V. Nguyen
{"title":"布比卡因-右美托咪定混合物与单独布比卡因在上肢骨手术中的术中镇静和术后镇痛效果:越南的一项随机比较研究","authors":"Nhung Tran, Khanh Hoang Pham, Thang Nguyen, Dao Huynh Tran, Hung Xuan Tong, C. V. Nguyen","doi":"10.29090/psa.2022.03.21.184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We aimed to compare intraoperative sedation and postoperative analgesic effects of brachial plexus block using bupivacaine-dexmedetomidine mixture (BD) versus bupivacaine alone (B) in upper extremity bone surgeries. We conducted a randomized comparative study at Can Tho City, Vietnam. We recruited patients aged 15 to 75 years, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) I-III grade, indicating bone surgeries of arm or forearm with supraclavicular brachial plexus block by ultrasound guidance. One hundred eight included patients were randomly divided into two groups: the BD group (54 patients) received a 30 ml mixture of 0.25% bupivacaine and 100 mcg dexmedetomidine, and the B group (54 patients) received 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine. The BD group had a sedative OAA/S score (Observer Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale) of level 4, accounting for 87% more than group B 37%, and an OAA/S score of level 3 in the BD group with 5 cases (9.3%) compared with 9 cases (16.7%) in group B, statistically significant difference with p <0.05. The onset and duration of sedative time in group BD was 9.8±3.5 and 92.7±34.1 minutes. The mean of postoperative analgesic time was 970.5±309.5 minutes in group BD statistically significantly longer than group B’s with 552.7±231.2 minutes ( p <0.001). In conclusion, a mixture of bupivacaine-dexmedetomidine in brachial plexus block for arm and forearm surgical fractures had greater sedative and postoperative analgesic effects than that of bupivacaine alone.","PeriodicalId":19761,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Sciences Asia","volume":"81 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraoperative sedation and postoperative analgesic effects of bupivacaine-dexmedetomidine mixture compared to bupivacaine alone in upper extremity bone surgeries: A randomized comparative study in Vietnam\",\"authors\":\"Nhung Tran, Khanh Hoang Pham, Thang Nguyen, Dao Huynh Tran, Hung Xuan Tong, C. V. Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.29090/psa.2022.03.21.184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We aimed to compare intraoperative sedation and postoperative analgesic effects of brachial plexus block using bupivacaine-dexmedetomidine mixture (BD) versus bupivacaine alone (B) in upper extremity bone surgeries. We conducted a randomized comparative study at Can Tho City, Vietnam. We recruited patients aged 15 to 75 years, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) I-III grade, indicating bone surgeries of arm or forearm with supraclavicular brachial plexus block by ultrasound guidance. One hundred eight included patients were randomly divided into two groups: the BD group (54 patients) received a 30 ml mixture of 0.25% bupivacaine and 100 mcg dexmedetomidine, and the B group (54 patients) received 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine. The BD group had a sedative OAA/S score (Observer Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale) of level 4, accounting for 87% more than group B 37%, and an OAA/S score of level 3 in the BD group with 5 cases (9.3%) compared with 9 cases (16.7%) in group B, statistically significant difference with p <0.05. The onset and duration of sedative time in group BD was 9.8±3.5 and 92.7±34.1 minutes. The mean of postoperative analgesic time was 970.5±309.5 minutes in group BD statistically significantly longer than group B’s with 552.7±231.2 minutes ( p <0.001). In conclusion, a mixture of bupivacaine-dexmedetomidine in brachial plexus block for arm and forearm surgical fractures had greater sedative and postoperative analgesic effects than that of bupivacaine alone.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19761,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmaceutical Sciences Asia\",\"volume\":\"81 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmaceutical Sciences Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29090/psa.2022.03.21.184\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutical Sciences Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29090/psa.2022.03.21.184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的目的是比较布比卡因-右美托咪定混合物(BD)与单独布比卡因(B)在上肢骨手术中的术中镇静和术后镇痛效果。我们在越南芹苴市进行了一项随机比较研究。我们招募年龄在15 - 75岁之间,ASA(美国麻醉学学会)I-III级,指示在超声引导下进行锁骨上臂丛阻滞的上臂或前臂骨手术的患者。108例纳入的患者随机分为两组:BD组(54例)接受0.25%布比卡因和100 mcg右美托咪定混合物30 ml, B组(54例)接受0.25%布比卡因30 ml。BD组镇静OAA/S评分(Observer Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale)为4级,占比为87%,高于B组37%;BD组OAA/S评分为3级,5例(9.3%)高于B组9例(16.7%),差异有统计学意义(p <0.05)。BD组镇静起效时间为9.8±3.5 min,持续时间为92.7±34.1 min。BD组术后平均镇痛时间为970.5±309.5 min,明显长于B组的552.7±231.2 min (p <0.001)。综上所述,布比卡因-右美托咪定联合应用于臂丛阻滞治疗手臂和前臂手术骨折具有比单独应用布比卡因更强的镇静和术后镇痛效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intraoperative sedation and postoperative analgesic effects of bupivacaine-dexmedetomidine mixture compared to bupivacaine alone in upper extremity bone surgeries: A randomized comparative study in Vietnam
We aimed to compare intraoperative sedation and postoperative analgesic effects of brachial plexus block using bupivacaine-dexmedetomidine mixture (BD) versus bupivacaine alone (B) in upper extremity bone surgeries. We conducted a randomized comparative study at Can Tho City, Vietnam. We recruited patients aged 15 to 75 years, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) I-III grade, indicating bone surgeries of arm or forearm with supraclavicular brachial plexus block by ultrasound guidance. One hundred eight included patients were randomly divided into two groups: the BD group (54 patients) received a 30 ml mixture of 0.25% bupivacaine and 100 mcg dexmedetomidine, and the B group (54 patients) received 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine. The BD group had a sedative OAA/S score (Observer Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale) of level 4, accounting for 87% more than group B 37%, and an OAA/S score of level 3 in the BD group with 5 cases (9.3%) compared with 9 cases (16.7%) in group B, statistically significant difference with p <0.05. The onset and duration of sedative time in group BD was 9.8±3.5 and 92.7±34.1 minutes. The mean of postoperative analgesic time was 970.5±309.5 minutes in group BD statistically significantly longer than group B’s with 552.7±231.2 minutes ( p <0.001). In conclusion, a mixture of bupivacaine-dexmedetomidine in brachial plexus block for arm and forearm surgical fractures had greater sedative and postoperative analgesic effects than that of bupivacaine alone.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmaceutical Sciences Asia
Pharmaceutical Sciences Asia Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Pharmaceutical Sciences Asia (PSA) journal is a double-blinded peer-reviewed journal in English published quarterly, by the Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Thailand. The PSA journal is formerly known as Mahidol University Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and committed to the timely publication of innovative articles and reviews. This journal is available in both printed and electronic formats. The PSA journal aims at establishing a publishing house that is open to all. It aims to disseminate knowledge; provide a learned reference in the field; and establish channels of communication between academic and research expert, policy makers and executives in industry and investment institutions. The journal publishes research articles, review articles, and scientific commentaries on all aspects of the pharmaceutical sciences and multidisciplinary field in health professions and medicine. More specifically, the journal publishes research on all areas of pharmaceutical sciences and related disciplines: Clinical Pharmacy Drug Synthesis and Discovery Targeted-Drug Delivery Pharmaceutics Biopharmaceutical Sciences Phytopharmaceutical Sciences Pharmacology and Toxicology Pharmaceutical Chemistry Nutraceuticals and Functional Foods Natural Products Social, Economic, and Administrative Pharmacy Clinical Drug Evaluation and Drug Policy Making Antimicrobials, Resistance and Infection Control Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics.
期刊最新文献
Locally-isolated protease-producing Bacillus spp. from soil inhibits biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus Medication errors analysis in Asia and Australia: A systematic review The effect of different sweeteners on the free radical scavenging activities, alcohol contents, sugar reductions, and hedonic properties of green tea kombucha Development and validation of a GC-MS method for determination of amphetamine-type stimulants and ketamine in human hair Effect of zonisamide and Nigella sativa on blood-brain barrier permeability and neurological severity in traumatic brain injury-induced mice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1