社会效度评估趋势,刊于应用行为分析杂志

J. L. Ferguson, Joseph H. Cihon, Justin B. Leaf, Sarah M. Van Meter, J. Mceachin, Ronald Leaf
{"title":"社会效度评估趋势,刊于应用行为分析杂志","authors":"J. L. Ferguson, Joseph H. Cihon, Justin B. Leaf, Sarah M. Van Meter, J. Mceachin, Ronald Leaf","doi":"10.1080/15021149.2018.1534771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Montrose Wolf provided a definition and outline of the importance of the assessment of social validity as it applies to the field of applied behavior analysis. Since Wolf’s seminal paper, researchers have conducted analyses of the social validity trends of the first 31 years (1968-1998) of the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (JABA). The purpose of the current review is to extend the findings those analyses by assessing the trends of the assessment of social validity in JABA from 1999-2016. Overall, the results of the present review indicated that social validity measures were reported in an average of 12% of articles published within JABA that met the inclusion criteria. The results are discussed within the context of the potential implications for the field of applied behavior analysis as well as areas of future research to improve the reporting of the assessment of social validity.","PeriodicalId":37052,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Behavior Analysis","volume":"50 1","pages":"146 - 157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"54","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of social validity trends in the journal of applied behavior analysis\",\"authors\":\"J. L. Ferguson, Joseph H. Cihon, Justin B. Leaf, Sarah M. Van Meter, J. Mceachin, Ronald Leaf\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15021149.2018.1534771\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Montrose Wolf provided a definition and outline of the importance of the assessment of social validity as it applies to the field of applied behavior analysis. Since Wolf’s seminal paper, researchers have conducted analyses of the social validity trends of the first 31 years (1968-1998) of the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (JABA). The purpose of the current review is to extend the findings those analyses by assessing the trends of the assessment of social validity in JABA from 1999-2016. Overall, the results of the present review indicated that social validity measures were reported in an average of 12% of articles published within JABA that met the inclusion criteria. The results are discussed within the context of the potential implications for the field of applied behavior analysis as well as areas of future research to improve the reporting of the assessment of social validity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Behavior Analysis\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"146 - 157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"54\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Behavior Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2018.1534771\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Behavior Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2018.1534771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 54

摘要

摘要:Montrose Wolf对社会效度评估在应用行为分析领域的重要性进行了定义和概述。自Wolf发表这篇开创性的论文以来,研究人员对《应用行为分析杂志》(JABA)前31年(1968-1998)的社会效度趋势进行了分析。本研究的目的是通过评估1999-2016年JABA社会效度评估的趋势来扩展这些分析的结果。总体而言,本综述的结果表明,在JABA中发表的符合纳入标准的文章中,平均有12%的文章报告了社会效度测量。研究结果在应用行为分析领域的潜在影响以及未来研究领域的背景下进行了讨论,以改进社会效度评估的报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of social validity trends in the journal of applied behavior analysis
ABSTRACT Montrose Wolf provided a definition and outline of the importance of the assessment of social validity as it applies to the field of applied behavior analysis. Since Wolf’s seminal paper, researchers have conducted analyses of the social validity trends of the first 31 years (1968-1998) of the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (JABA). The purpose of the current review is to extend the findings those analyses by assessing the trends of the assessment of social validity in JABA from 1999-2016. Overall, the results of the present review indicated that social validity measures were reported in an average of 12% of articles published within JABA that met the inclusion criteria. The results are discussed within the context of the potential implications for the field of applied behavior analysis as well as areas of future research to improve the reporting of the assessment of social validity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Behavior Analysis
European Journal of Behavior Analysis Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
Examining implicit and explicit anti-Black racial bias in children: A repeated measure design using the Function Acquisition Speed Test (FAST) Where engagement happens: Parent perspectives on engagement in behavioural interventions Gather ‘round and listen close: Increasing responding to voices in children with autism Comparing the stimulus-pairing yes/no procedure to match-to-sample to establish equivalence classes with adults Geographic affiliation of authors and cooperative research in the Mexican , European , and Brazilian journal of behavior analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1