综述文章:育儿假、工作场所特征、男性健康和大流行:高收入国家与政策相关的父亲研究现状

Alison Koslowski
{"title":"综述文章:育儿假、工作场所特征、男性健康和大流行:高收入国家与政策相关的父亲研究现状","authors":"Alison Koslowski","doi":"10.20377/jfr-820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This review article provides an overview on the state of policy-related fatherhood research in high income countries.\nBackground: The review article focuses on four main currents of multi-disciplinary policy-related fatherhood research. The first considers the research on national level parenting leaves. The second explores research on organisation and workplace policies. The third presents research on policies around male health and fatherhood practices. The fourth looks at the impact of COVID-19 related policies on fathers.\nMethod: This is a review article and so presents a review of the literature. It is not a systematic literature review but rather aims to show the benefit of multi-disciplinary conversation within fatherhood research.\nResults: Commonalities are found across the four policy-related areas in terms of key questions, but also in terms of research gaps.\nConclusion: There is consensus around what works for engaging fathers across policy contexts. There is perhaps a paradox in that 'de-gendered' policies are usually most effective, but that fathers need to recognise that these degendered policies are for them.","PeriodicalId":44669,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrifte Fur Familienforschung-Journal of Family Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review article: Parenting leaves, workplace characteristics, male health, and the pandemic: Currents in policy-related fatherhood research in higher income countries\",\"authors\":\"Alison Koslowski\",\"doi\":\"10.20377/jfr-820\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: This review article provides an overview on the state of policy-related fatherhood research in high income countries.\\nBackground: The review article focuses on four main currents of multi-disciplinary policy-related fatherhood research. The first considers the research on national level parenting leaves. The second explores research on organisation and workplace policies. The third presents research on policies around male health and fatherhood practices. The fourth looks at the impact of COVID-19 related policies on fathers.\\nMethod: This is a review article and so presents a review of the literature. It is not a systematic literature review but rather aims to show the benefit of multi-disciplinary conversation within fatherhood research.\\nResults: Commonalities are found across the four policy-related areas in terms of key questions, but also in terms of research gaps.\\nConclusion: There is consensus around what works for engaging fathers across policy contexts. There is perhaps a paradox in that 'de-gendered' policies are usually most effective, but that fathers need to recognise that these degendered policies are for them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrifte Fur Familienforschung-Journal of Family Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrifte Fur Familienforschung-Journal of Family Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-820\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrifte Fur Familienforschung-Journal of Family Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本文综述了高收入国家与政策相关的父权研究现状。背景:本文综述了多学科政策相关父亲研究的四个主要趋势。第一部分考虑了国家层面的育儿假研究。第二篇探讨了组织和工作场所政策的研究。第三份报告介绍了有关男性健康和父亲做法的政策研究。第四份报告着眼于COVID-19相关政策对父亲的影响。方法:这是一篇综述文章,因此提出了文献综述。这不是一个系统的文献综述,而是旨在展示在父亲研究中多学科对话的好处。结果:就关键问题而言,四个政策相关领域存在共性,但在研究差距方面也存在共性。结论:对于如何在政策背景下让父亲参与进来,人们达成了共识。“去性别化”的政策通常是最有效的,但父亲们需要认识到,这些去性别化的政策是为他们准备的,这可能是一个悖论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Review article: Parenting leaves, workplace characteristics, male health, and the pandemic: Currents in policy-related fatherhood research in higher income countries
Objective: This review article provides an overview on the state of policy-related fatherhood research in high income countries. Background: The review article focuses on four main currents of multi-disciplinary policy-related fatherhood research. The first considers the research on national level parenting leaves. The second explores research on organisation and workplace policies. The third presents research on policies around male health and fatherhood practices. The fourth looks at the impact of COVID-19 related policies on fathers. Method: This is a review article and so presents a review of the literature. It is not a systematic literature review but rather aims to show the benefit of multi-disciplinary conversation within fatherhood research. Results: Commonalities are found across the four policy-related areas in terms of key questions, but also in terms of research gaps. Conclusion: There is consensus around what works for engaging fathers across policy contexts. There is perhaps a paradox in that 'de-gendered' policies are usually most effective, but that fathers need to recognise that these degendered policies are for them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gender differences in the association between nonstandard work schedules and work-family conflict: A mixed methods analysis in France Transition to fatherhood and adjustments in working hours: The importance of organizational policy feedback Towards a conceptualisation of intensive parenting norms: Testing exact and approximate measurement invariance across social and country contexts Do partnership transitions affect individual perceptions of aging in later life? Findings from the German Ageing Survey and the NRW80+ study Arranging childcare in two Nordic countries: A comparison of ECEC start in Iceland and Sweden
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1