公平评估一项针对坦桑尼亚中学边缘化女孩的方案的成本效益

IF 0.9 4区 经济学 Q4 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Journal of Development Effectiveness Pub Date : 2020-11-19 DOI:10.1080/19439342.2020.1844782
R. Sabates, P. Rose, B. Alcott, Marcos Delprato
{"title":"公平评估一项针对坦桑尼亚中学边缘化女孩的方案的成本效益","authors":"R. Sabates, P. Rose, B. Alcott, Marcos Delprato","doi":"10.1080/19439342.2020.1844782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Cost-effectiveness studies rarely pay explicit attention to whether resources are used effectively to benefit the most marginalised. By linking a quasi-experimental design with detailed financial information, we analyse the cost-effectiveness of the Campaign for Female Education (CAMFED)’s programme in Tanzania. The programme provides targeted, multi-dimensional support to marginalised girls in government secondary schools in deprived rural areas. We find the cost-effectiveness of CAMFED’s programme to be similar to interventions designed for more advantaged populations who are easier (and less costly) to reach. There is further evidence of positive spill-over effects to boys in the schools supported by CAMFED.","PeriodicalId":46384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Development Effectiveness","volume":"35 1","pages":"28 - 46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing cost-effectiveness with equity of a programme targeting marginalised girls in secondary schools in Tanzania\",\"authors\":\"R. Sabates, P. Rose, B. Alcott, Marcos Delprato\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19439342.2020.1844782\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Cost-effectiveness studies rarely pay explicit attention to whether resources are used effectively to benefit the most marginalised. By linking a quasi-experimental design with detailed financial information, we analyse the cost-effectiveness of the Campaign for Female Education (CAMFED)’s programme in Tanzania. The programme provides targeted, multi-dimensional support to marginalised girls in government secondary schools in deprived rural areas. We find the cost-effectiveness of CAMFED’s programme to be similar to interventions designed for more advantaged populations who are easier (and less costly) to reach. There is further evidence of positive spill-over effects to boys in the schools supported by CAMFED.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Development Effectiveness\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"28 - 46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Development Effectiveness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2020.1844782\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Development Effectiveness","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2020.1844782","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

成本效益研究很少明确关注资源是否被有效地利用以造福最边缘化的群体。通过将准实验设计与详细的财务信息联系起来,我们分析了坦桑尼亚女性教育运动(CAMFED)项目的成本效益。该方案向贫困农村地区公立中学的边缘化女孩提供有针对性的多方面支持。我们发现CAMFED项目的成本效益与为更容易接触到(成本也更低)的更有利人群设计的干预措施相似。有进一步的证据表明,在CAMFED支持的学校里,对男孩产生了积极的溢出效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing cost-effectiveness with equity of a programme targeting marginalised girls in secondary schools in Tanzania
ABSTRACT Cost-effectiveness studies rarely pay explicit attention to whether resources are used effectively to benefit the most marginalised. By linking a quasi-experimental design with detailed financial information, we analyse the cost-effectiveness of the Campaign for Female Education (CAMFED)’s programme in Tanzania. The programme provides targeted, multi-dimensional support to marginalised girls in government secondary schools in deprived rural areas. We find the cost-effectiveness of CAMFED’s programme to be similar to interventions designed for more advantaged populations who are easier (and less costly) to reach. There is further evidence of positive spill-over effects to boys in the schools supported by CAMFED.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Does the small business programme benefit self-employed workers? Evidence from Nicaragua Grow the pie, or have it? Using machine learning to impact heterogeneity in the Ultra-poor graduation model How do patent subsidies drive SMEs to patent? Evidence from China Impact of cash transfer on food accessibility and calorie-intake in Pakistan Self-selection versus population-based sampling for evaluation of an agronomy training program in Uganda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1