两种版权制度下的创作行动:澳大利亚和美国的电影制作和视觉艺术

IF 1.5 3区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION Communication Culture & Critique Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.1093/ccc/tcaa003
Aram Sinnreich, P. Aufderheide, Donte Newman
{"title":"两种版权制度下的创作行动:澳大利亚和美国的电影制作和视觉艺术","authors":"Aram Sinnreich, P. Aufderheide, Donte Newman","doi":"10.1093/ccc/tcaa003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A comparison of the behaviors of two creative populations operating within cross-media environments in the United States and Australia tests the comparative effect of the two nations' legal environments on the range of creative expression and on costs of production in increasingly digitized production processes. The U.S. creators have access to the flexible and expansive exception of fair use, while Australian creators' ability to use third-party copyrighted content are far more constrained. While availability of copyright exceptions plays a crucial role, other factors including demographics, disciplinary norms, and social inequality may also be important in creative practices and professions.","PeriodicalId":54193,"journal":{"name":"Communication Culture & Critique","volume":"1 1","pages":"384-401"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creative Action Under Two Copyright Regimes: Filmmaking and Visual Arts in Australia and the United States\",\"authors\":\"Aram Sinnreich, P. Aufderheide, Donte Newman\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ccc/tcaa003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n A comparison of the behaviors of two creative populations operating within cross-media environments in the United States and Australia tests the comparative effect of the two nations' legal environments on the range of creative expression and on costs of production in increasingly digitized production processes. The U.S. creators have access to the flexible and expansive exception of fair use, while Australian creators' ability to use third-party copyrighted content are far more constrained. While availability of copyright exceptions plays a crucial role, other factors including demographics, disciplinary norms, and social inequality may also be important in creative practices and professions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communication Culture & Critique\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"384-401\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communication Culture & Critique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcaa003\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Culture & Critique","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcaa003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

对在美国和澳大利亚跨媒体环境中工作的两个创意人群的行为进行比较,测试了两国法律环境对创意表达范围和日益数字化的生产过程中生产成本的比较影响。美国创作者享有灵活而广泛的合理使用例外,而澳大利亚创作者使用第三方版权内容的能力则受到更多限制。虽然版权例外的可用性起着至关重要的作用,但其他因素,包括人口统计、学科规范和社会不平等,在创造性实践和专业中也可能很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Creative Action Under Two Copyright Regimes: Filmmaking and Visual Arts in Australia and the United States
A comparison of the behaviors of two creative populations operating within cross-media environments in the United States and Australia tests the comparative effect of the two nations' legal environments on the range of creative expression and on costs of production in increasingly digitized production processes. The U.S. creators have access to the flexible and expansive exception of fair use, while Australian creators' ability to use third-party copyrighted content are far more constrained. While availability of copyright exceptions plays a crucial role, other factors including demographics, disciplinary norms, and social inequality may also be important in creative practices and professions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: CCC provides an international forum for critical research in communication, media, and cultural studies. We welcome high-quality research and analyses that place questions of power, inequality, and justice at the center of empirical and theoretical inquiry. CCC seeks to bring a diversity of critical approaches (political economy, feminist analysis, critical race theory, postcolonial critique, cultural studies, queer theory) to bear on the role of communication, media, and culture in power dynamics on a global scale. CCC is especially interested in critical scholarship that engages with emerging lines of inquiry across the humanities and social sciences. We seek to explore the place of mediated communication in current topics of theorization and cross-disciplinary research (including affect, branding, posthumanism, labor, temporality, ordinariness, and networked everyday life, to name just a few examples). In the coming years, we anticipate publishing special issues on these themes.
期刊最新文献
Cartography of Afro-Asian relations in America: co-racialization and nanohealing Not just platform, nor cooperatives: worker-owned technologies from below When mass culture meets high culture: reality television and big data at the art museum Afrofemtrism: a critical examination of the relationship between gender, technology, and society Kū Kia‘i Kahuku: indigenizing social media, civic streaming, and sociospatial symmetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1