巴基斯坦卡拉奇SMBB医学院用形成性和总结性测验评估医学生生理学课程的学习成绩

M. Rashid, A. Soomro, A. H. Abro, Syeda Beenish Noman
{"title":"巴基斯坦卡拉奇SMBB医学院用形成性和总结性测验评估医学生生理学课程的学习成绩","authors":"M. Rashid, A. Soomro, A. H. Abro, Syeda Beenish Noman","doi":"10.11648/J.AAP.20170201.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Formative practice quizzes have become common resources for self-evaluation and focused reviews of course content in the medical curriculum. In the current study two separate studies were conducted to (1) compare the effects of a single or multiple voluntary practice quizzes on subsequent summative examinations and (2) examine when students are most likely to use practice quizzes relative to the summative examinations. Material and Methods In the first study, providing a single online practice quiz followed by instructor feedback had no effect on examination average grades compared to the previous year or student performances on similar questions. However, there were significant correlations between student performance on each practice quiz and each summative examination (r 50.42 and r 50.24). When students were provided multiple practice quizzes with feedback (second study). Results there was a weak correlation between the frequency of use and performance on each summative examination (r 50.17 and r 50.07). The frequency with which students accessed the practice quizzes was greatest the day before each examination. In both studies, there was a decline in the level of student utilization of practice quizzes overtime. Conclusion we concluded that practice quizzes provide some predictive value for performances on summative examinations. Second, making practice quizzes available for longer periods prior to summative examinations does not promote the use of the quizzes as a study strategy because students appear to use them mostly to assess knowledge one to two days prior to examinations.","PeriodicalId":7392,"journal":{"name":"Accident Analysis & Prevention","volume":"16 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medical Students Academic Performance Assessment in Physiology Courses Using Formative and Summative Quizzes at SMBB Medical College Karachi, Pakistan\",\"authors\":\"M. Rashid, A. Soomro, A. H. Abro, Syeda Beenish Noman\",\"doi\":\"10.11648/J.AAP.20170201.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Formative practice quizzes have become common resources for self-evaluation and focused reviews of course content in the medical curriculum. In the current study two separate studies were conducted to (1) compare the effects of a single or multiple voluntary practice quizzes on subsequent summative examinations and (2) examine when students are most likely to use practice quizzes relative to the summative examinations. Material and Methods In the first study, providing a single online practice quiz followed by instructor feedback had no effect on examination average grades compared to the previous year or student performances on similar questions. However, there were significant correlations between student performance on each practice quiz and each summative examination (r 50.42 and r 50.24). When students were provided multiple practice quizzes with feedback (second study). Results there was a weak correlation between the frequency of use and performance on each summative examination (r 50.17 and r 50.07). The frequency with which students accessed the practice quizzes was greatest the day before each examination. In both studies, there was a decline in the level of student utilization of practice quizzes overtime. Conclusion we concluded that practice quizzes provide some predictive value for performances on summative examinations. Second, making practice quizzes available for longer periods prior to summative examinations does not promote the use of the quizzes as a study strategy because students appear to use them mostly to assess knowledge one to two days prior to examinations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accident Analysis & Prevention\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accident Analysis & Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.AAP.20170201.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident Analysis & Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.AAP.20170201.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在医学课程中,形成性练习测验已经成为自我评价和重点复习课程内容的常用资源。在目前的研究中,进行了两项独立的研究,以(1)比较单个或多个自愿练习测验对随后的总结性考试的影响,(2)检查学生何时最有可能使用练习测验相对于总结性考试。材料和方法在第一项研究中,提供一个单独的在线练习测验,然后是教师的反馈,与前一年的考试平均成绩或学生在类似问题上的表现相比,没有影响。然而,学生在每次练习测验和每次总结性考试中的表现之间存在显著相关(r 50.42和r 50.24)。当学生被提供多个有反馈的练习测验时(第二次研究)。结果使用频率与各项总结性检查成绩呈弱相关(r为50.17,r为50.07)。学生在每次考试的前一天使用练习测验的频率最高。在这两项研究中,随着时间的推移,学生使用练习测验的水平有所下降。结论模拟测验对总结性考试的成绩有一定的预测价值。第二,在总结性考试之前提供较长时间的练习测验,并不能促进将测验作为一种学习策略的使用,因为学生似乎主要是在考试前一到两天用测验来评估知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Medical Students Academic Performance Assessment in Physiology Courses Using Formative and Summative Quizzes at SMBB Medical College Karachi, Pakistan
Background Formative practice quizzes have become common resources for self-evaluation and focused reviews of course content in the medical curriculum. In the current study two separate studies were conducted to (1) compare the effects of a single or multiple voluntary practice quizzes on subsequent summative examinations and (2) examine when students are most likely to use practice quizzes relative to the summative examinations. Material and Methods In the first study, providing a single online practice quiz followed by instructor feedback had no effect on examination average grades compared to the previous year or student performances on similar questions. However, there were significant correlations between student performance on each practice quiz and each summative examination (r 50.42 and r 50.24). When students were provided multiple practice quizzes with feedback (second study). Results there was a weak correlation between the frequency of use and performance on each summative examination (r 50.17 and r 50.07). The frequency with which students accessed the practice quizzes was greatest the day before each examination. In both studies, there was a decline in the level of student utilization of practice quizzes overtime. Conclusion we concluded that practice quizzes provide some predictive value for performances on summative examinations. Second, making practice quizzes available for longer periods prior to summative examinations does not promote the use of the quizzes as a study strategy because students appear to use them mostly to assess knowledge one to two days prior to examinations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Thyme, Celery and Salinomycin Implication on Antioxidant Capacity and Neurotransmitters Related to Milk Production in Pregnant Barki Ewes Studying Resistance of Some Dairy Cattle Breeds to Heat Stress in Relation to Milk Yield Search for Quantitative Parameters of Scan Path of Image Viewing by Biologically Motivated Model A Possible Way to Improve the Quality of Speech Perception by Increasing the Number of Electrodes in a Cochlear Implant from 8 to 22 Impact of Royal Jelly Supplement on Ewe's Milk Fat Content and Fatty Acid Profile During the Early Stage of Lactation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1