国际关系国际分校模式:当前争论与未来展望

{"title":"国际关系国际分校模式:当前争论与未来展望","authors":"","doi":"10.37118/ijdr.26811.06.2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the controversies surrounding the international branch campus (IBC) model. After outlining the research purpose, theoretical framework, and methodology, the paper tackles the stated myths of IBCs and offers evidence-based facts. Evidence is offered to support a critique of the myths that are interestingly advanced through research. This review establishes that (1) recent IBC developments on the provider side help to mitigate the risk of post-colonialism; (2) IBC continues to experience dramatic growth, albeit in different and increasingly changing formats, motivations, and targets; (3) virtual programs do not necessarily impede the growth of other forms of higher education; and (4) the majority of IBC programs are of acceptable quality due to high levels of regulation and student engagement.","PeriodicalId":13916,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Development and Research","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International relations the international branch campus model: current debates and prospects for the future\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.37118/ijdr.26811.06.2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines the controversies surrounding the international branch campus (IBC) model. After outlining the research purpose, theoretical framework, and methodology, the paper tackles the stated myths of IBCs and offers evidence-based facts. Evidence is offered to support a critique of the myths that are interestingly advanced through research. This review establishes that (1) recent IBC developments on the provider side help to mitigate the risk of post-colonialism; (2) IBC continues to experience dramatic growth, albeit in different and increasingly changing formats, motivations, and targets; (3) virtual programs do not necessarily impede the growth of other forms of higher education; and (4) the majority of IBC programs are of acceptable quality due to high levels of regulation and student engagement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Drug Development and Research\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Drug Development and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37118/ijdr.26811.06.2023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Development and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37118/ijdr.26811.06.2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了围绕国际分校模式的争议。在概述了研究目的、理论框架和方法之后,本文解决了IBCs的神话,并提供了基于证据的事实。提供证据来支持通过研究有趣地推进的神话的批评。本综述确定:(1)供应商方面IBC最近的发展有助于减轻后殖民主义的风险;(2) IBC继续经历戏剧性的增长,尽管形式、动机和目标不同且日益变化;(3)虚拟课程不一定会阻碍其他高等教育形式的发展;(4)由于高水平的监管和学生参与度,大多数IBC课程的质量都是可以接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
International relations the international branch campus model: current debates and prospects for the future
This article examines the controversies surrounding the international branch campus (IBC) model. After outlining the research purpose, theoretical framework, and methodology, the paper tackles the stated myths of IBCs and offers evidence-based facts. Evidence is offered to support a critique of the myths that are interestingly advanced through research. This review establishes that (1) recent IBC developments on the provider side help to mitigate the risk of post-colonialism; (2) IBC continues to experience dramatic growth, albeit in different and increasingly changing formats, motivations, and targets; (3) virtual programs do not necessarily impede the growth of other forms of higher education; and (4) the majority of IBC programs are of acceptable quality due to high levels of regulation and student engagement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rethinking of masculinities: an evolving perspective Desafios no atendimento de urgência: a tecnologia a serviço da humanização e acolhimento A case study on the impact of technology integration on student learning outcomes at indus international school, bangalore Ease of life and sustainability (current events for the future life) Neurodidáctica: el puente hacia un aprendizaje efectivo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1