在不道德的地方保持道德。

Graham F. Reed
{"title":"在不道德的地方保持道德。","authors":"Graham F. Reed","doi":"10.1016/0271-5392(81)90022-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The distinction between moral behaviour and ethical codification is considered, and the range of possible approaches to the justification of ethical systems and their formulation is outlined. The question is raised as to whether our psychological codifiers examined alternative approaches and whether, in approving the Codes, members realized that they were endorsing a particular approach. Comments are made about ironic aspects of our reactions to experimental deception, and reservations expressed about the logic and consistency of our approaches to certain moral problems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79378,"journal":{"name":"Social science & medicine. Part F, Medical & social ethics","volume":"15 1","pages":"Pages 19-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0271-5392(81)90022-8","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On being moral in immoral places\",\"authors\":\"Graham F. Reed\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0271-5392(81)90022-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The distinction between moral behaviour and ethical codification is considered, and the range of possible approaches to the justification of ethical systems and their formulation is outlined. The question is raised as to whether our psychological codifiers examined alternative approaches and whether, in approving the Codes, members realized that they were endorsing a particular approach. Comments are made about ironic aspects of our reactions to experimental deception, and reservations expressed about the logic and consistency of our approaches to certain moral problems.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social science & medicine. Part F, Medical & social ethics\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 19-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1981-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0271-5392(81)90022-8\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social science & medicine. Part F, Medical & social ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0271539281900228\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social science & medicine. Part F, Medical & social ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0271539281900228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

考虑了道德行为和伦理编纂之间的区别,并概述了为伦理系统及其制定辩护的可能方法的范围。有人提出的问题是,我们的心理编纂者是否审查了其他办法,成员们在批准《守则》时是否意识到他们正在赞同一种特定的办法。对我们对实验性欺骗反应的讽刺方面进行了评论,并对我们处理某些道德问题的方法的逻辑和一致性表示了保留意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On being moral in immoral places

The distinction between moral behaviour and ethical codification is considered, and the range of possible approaches to the justification of ethical systems and their formulation is outlined. The question is raised as to whether our psychological codifiers examined alternative approaches and whether, in approving the Codes, members realized that they were endorsing a particular approach. Comments are made about ironic aspects of our reactions to experimental deception, and reservations expressed about the logic and consistency of our approaches to certain moral problems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Justice and a universal right to basic health care. What is the obligation of the medical profession in the distribution of health care? Triage in medical practices: an unacceptable model? The involuntary commitment and treatment of mentally ill persons. The right of public access to cadaver organs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1