小组工作评估的注意标准

IF 1.6 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal for Specialists in Group Work Pub Date : 2021-07-03 DOI:10.1080/01933922.2021.1942346
Caitlyn Bennett, Ashley J Blount, Jennifer Gerlach, Katy Schroeder, Clark D. Ausloos, Zachary D. Bloom, Kristopher M. Goodrich, K. M. Hunnicutt Hollenbaugh, John J. Taylor
{"title":"小组工作评估的注意标准","authors":"Caitlyn Bennett, Ashley J Blount, Jennifer Gerlach, Katy Schroeder, Clark D. Ausloos, Zachary D. Bloom, Kristopher M. Goodrich, K. M. Hunnicutt Hollenbaugh, John J. Taylor","doi":"10.1080/01933922.2021.1942346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Standards of Care for Assessment in Group Work represent a collaborative effort between the Association for Assessment and Research in Counseling (AARC) and the Association for Specialists in Group Work (ASGW). The purpose of these standards is to address the distinctive aspects of group work assessment that group workers often overlook and may lead to ineffective or invalid assessment. Examples of these considerations include the overuse of one method of data collection (self-report) in group work assessment, the importance of using appropriate and culturally relevant assessments in groups with diverse members, and intentionally identifying the difference between assessing group process versus group outcomes. The committee’s goal was to develop standards that highlight the importance of preferred practices in group work assessment and for counselors to use them in conjunction with other standards related to measurement and assessment in counseling.","PeriodicalId":45501,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Specialists in Group Work","volume":"30 1","pages":"238 - 243"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standards of Care for Assessment in Group Work\",\"authors\":\"Caitlyn Bennett, Ashley J Blount, Jennifer Gerlach, Katy Schroeder, Clark D. Ausloos, Zachary D. Bloom, Kristopher M. Goodrich, K. M. Hunnicutt Hollenbaugh, John J. Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01933922.2021.1942346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The Standards of Care for Assessment in Group Work represent a collaborative effort between the Association for Assessment and Research in Counseling (AARC) and the Association for Specialists in Group Work (ASGW). The purpose of these standards is to address the distinctive aspects of group work assessment that group workers often overlook and may lead to ineffective or invalid assessment. Examples of these considerations include the overuse of one method of data collection (self-report) in group work assessment, the importance of using appropriate and culturally relevant assessments in groups with diverse members, and intentionally identifying the difference between assessing group process versus group outcomes. The committee’s goal was to develop standards that highlight the importance of preferred practices in group work assessment and for counselors to use them in conjunction with other standards related to measurement and assessment in counseling.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Specialists in Group Work\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"238 - 243\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Specialists in Group Work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01933922.2021.1942346\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Specialists in Group Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01933922.2021.1942346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

小组工作评估护理标准代表了咨询评估与研究协会(AARC)和小组工作专家协会(ASGW)之间的合作成果。这些标准的目的是解决小组工作评估的不同方面,小组工作人员经常忽视,并可能导致无效或无效的评估。这些考虑的例子包括在小组工作评估中过度使用一种数据收集方法(自我报告),在有不同成员的小组中使用适当的和文化相关的评估的重要性,以及有意识别评估小组过程与小组结果之间的差异。该委员会的目标是制定标准,突出小组工作评估中首选做法的重要性,并使咨询师将其与咨询中有关测量和评估的其他标准结合起来使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Standards of Care for Assessment in Group Work
ABSTRACT The Standards of Care for Assessment in Group Work represent a collaborative effort between the Association for Assessment and Research in Counseling (AARC) and the Association for Specialists in Group Work (ASGW). The purpose of these standards is to address the distinctive aspects of group work assessment that group workers often overlook and may lead to ineffective or invalid assessment. Examples of these considerations include the overuse of one method of data collection (self-report) in group work assessment, the importance of using appropriate and culturally relevant assessments in groups with diverse members, and intentionally identifying the difference between assessing group process versus group outcomes. The committee’s goal was to develop standards that highlight the importance of preferred practices in group work assessment and for counselors to use them in conjunction with other standards related to measurement and assessment in counseling.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of Experiential Group Training in Developing Leadership Self-Efficacy of Counselors-In-Training Using Reflecting Teams in Solution-Focused Group Counseling Experiential Training for Master’s Students Exploring Multimodality with Online Peer-Facilitated Experiential Learning in Group Work Training The Achieving Success Everyday (ASE) Group Counseling Model Applied in Rural Schools: Implications for Future School Counselor Training and Practice Examining a Cohesion-Focused Model in Experiential Growth Groups: A Single Case Research Design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1