新兴数字规划数据——规划实践与评估的新研究视角

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography Pub Date : 2018-10-15 DOI:10.1080/00167223.2018.1528555
Christian Fertner, Andreas Aagaard Christensen, P. S. Andersen, A. S. Olafsson, Søren Præstholm, O. H. Caspersen, Julien Grunfelder
{"title":"新兴数字规划数据——规划实践与评估的新研究视角","authors":"Christian Fertner, Andreas Aagaard Christensen, P. S. Andersen, A. S. Olafsson, Søren Præstholm, O. H. Caspersen, Julien Grunfelder","doi":"10.1080/00167223.2018.1528555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Profound digitalization of public administration is gaining momentum and spatial planning is no exception. To increase the transparency of planning and its usefulness for public and private actors, planning authorities have integrated production and online distribution of digital plan data within existing planning practices and workflows. Many European countries have established public spatial planning databases. Denmark is one of the forerunners in that digitalization. Since 2006, all legal plans are registered in an open geodatabase including over 34,000 currently effective local development plans. Despite the obvious potential of such data to inform about planning practice and associated outcomes, research using these new data is rare, mainly focusing on technical or judicial aspects. Questions related to planning practice, efficiency, evaluation and design have hardly been looked into. In this paper, we provide a short overview of digital plan data in the Danish database as well as similar data in Nordic countries. We then discuss research perspectives regarding plan evaluation and planning practice and we argue that digital plans represent a new transdisciplinary type of intentionally explicit data source for analysis of land change processes.","PeriodicalId":45790,"journal":{"name":"Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emerging digital plan data – new research perspectives on planning practice and evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Christian Fertner, Andreas Aagaard Christensen, P. S. Andersen, A. S. Olafsson, Søren Præstholm, O. H. Caspersen, Julien Grunfelder\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00167223.2018.1528555\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Profound digitalization of public administration is gaining momentum and spatial planning is no exception. To increase the transparency of planning and its usefulness for public and private actors, planning authorities have integrated production and online distribution of digital plan data within existing planning practices and workflows. Many European countries have established public spatial planning databases. Denmark is one of the forerunners in that digitalization. Since 2006, all legal plans are registered in an open geodatabase including over 34,000 currently effective local development plans. Despite the obvious potential of such data to inform about planning practice and associated outcomes, research using these new data is rare, mainly focusing on technical or judicial aspects. Questions related to planning practice, efficiency, evaluation and design have hardly been looked into. In this paper, we provide a short overview of digital plan data in the Danish database as well as similar data in Nordic countries. We then discuss research perspectives regarding plan evaluation and planning practice and we argue that digital plans represent a new transdisciplinary type of intentionally explicit data source for analysis of land change processes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00167223.2018.1528555\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00167223.2018.1528555","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

公共管理的深度数字化正在兴起,空间规划也不例外。为了提高规划的透明度及其对公共和私人行为体的有用性,规划当局已将数字规划数据的制作和在线分发纳入现有的规划实践和工作流程。许多欧洲国家建立了公共空间规划数据库。丹麦是数字化的先行者之一。自2006年以来,所有合法的规划都在一个开放的地理数据库中登记,其中包括34,000多个目前有效的地方发展规划。尽管这些数据具有为规划实践和相关结果提供信息的明显潜力,但利用这些新数据进行的研究很少,主要集中在技术或司法方面。与规划实践、效率、评价和设计有关的问题几乎没有得到研究。在本文中,我们简要概述了丹麦数据库中的数字计划数据以及北欧国家的类似数据。然后,我们讨论了关于规划评估和规划实践的研究观点,我们认为数字规划代表了一种新的跨学科类型的有意明确的数据来源,用于分析土地变化过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Emerging digital plan data – new research perspectives on planning practice and evaluation
ABSTRACT Profound digitalization of public administration is gaining momentum and spatial planning is no exception. To increase the transparency of planning and its usefulness for public and private actors, planning authorities have integrated production and online distribution of digital plan data within existing planning practices and workflows. Many European countries have established public spatial planning databases. Denmark is one of the forerunners in that digitalization. Since 2006, all legal plans are registered in an open geodatabase including over 34,000 currently effective local development plans. Despite the obvious potential of such data to inform about planning practice and associated outcomes, research using these new data is rare, mainly focusing on technical or judicial aspects. Questions related to planning practice, efficiency, evaluation and design have hardly been looked into. In this paper, we provide a short overview of digital plan data in the Danish database as well as similar data in Nordic countries. We then discuss research perspectives regarding plan evaluation and planning practice and we argue that digital plans represent a new transdisciplinary type of intentionally explicit data source for analysis of land change processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: DJG is an interdisciplinary, international journal that publishes peer reviewed research articles on all aspects of geography. Coverage includes such topics as human geography, physical geography, human-environment interactions, Earth Observation, and Geographical Information Science. DJG also welcomes articles which address geographical perspectives of e.g. environmental studies, development studies, planning, landscape ecology and sustainability science. In addition to full-length papers, DJG publishes research notes. The journal has two annual issues. Authors from all parts of the world working within geography or related fields are invited to publish their research in the journal.
期刊最新文献
Variations in Türkiye’s sea surface temperatures Biomass, productivity and monetary efficiency of various cropping systems in the Almora district of the Indian Himalaya A geospatial perspective of flood risk hotspots, transport networks and emergency response services in Accra, Ghana Youth labour markets in the Southern European Union, 2009-2021: deciphering trajectories of resilience through a decade of consecutive crises Spatio-temporal Variation Analysis of Thermal Climate in Response to Urban Cover Changes: A Case Study of Delhi Using Landsat Data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1