访问控制模型的启发式安全性分析

Peter Amthor, Winfried E. Kühnhauser, Anja Pölck
{"title":"访问控制模型的启发式安全性分析","authors":"Peter Amthor, Winfried E. Kühnhauser, Anja Pölck","doi":"10.1145/2462410.2462413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Model-based security engineering uses formal security models for specifying and analyzing access control systems. Tool-based model analysis encounters a fundamental difficulty here: on the one hand, real-world access control systems generally are quite large and complex and require models that have high expressive power. On the other hand, analysis of such models is often pestered by computational complexity or even non-decidability, making it difficult to devise algorithms for automated analysis tools. One approach to this problem is to limiting the expressive power of the modeling calculus, resulting in restrictions to the spectrum of application scenarios that can be modeled. In this paper we propose a different approach: a heuristic-based method for analyzing the safety properties of access control models with full expressive power. Aiming at generality, the paper focuses on the lineage of HRU-style, automaton-based access control models that are fundamental for modeling the dynamic behavior of contemporary role-based or attribute-based access control systems.\n The paper motivates a heuristics-based approach to model analysis, describes in detail a heuristic model safety analysis algorithm, and discusses its computational complexity. The algorithm is the core of a security model analysis tool within the context of a security policy engineering workbench; a formal description of major components of its heuristic-based symbolic model execution engine is given, and its capacity to analyze complex real-world access control systems is evaluated.","PeriodicalId":74509,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ... ACM symposium on access control models and technologies. ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies","volume":"44 1","pages":"137-148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heuristic safety analysis of access control models\",\"authors\":\"Peter Amthor, Winfried E. Kühnhauser, Anja Pölck\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2462410.2462413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Model-based security engineering uses formal security models for specifying and analyzing access control systems. Tool-based model analysis encounters a fundamental difficulty here: on the one hand, real-world access control systems generally are quite large and complex and require models that have high expressive power. On the other hand, analysis of such models is often pestered by computational complexity or even non-decidability, making it difficult to devise algorithms for automated analysis tools. One approach to this problem is to limiting the expressive power of the modeling calculus, resulting in restrictions to the spectrum of application scenarios that can be modeled. In this paper we propose a different approach: a heuristic-based method for analyzing the safety properties of access control models with full expressive power. Aiming at generality, the paper focuses on the lineage of HRU-style, automaton-based access control models that are fundamental for modeling the dynamic behavior of contemporary role-based or attribute-based access control systems.\\n The paper motivates a heuristics-based approach to model analysis, describes in detail a heuristic model safety analysis algorithm, and discusses its computational complexity. The algorithm is the core of a security model analysis tool within the context of a security policy engineering workbench; a formal description of major components of its heuristic-based symbolic model execution engine is given, and its capacity to analyze complex real-world access control systems is evaluated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74509,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the ... ACM symposium on access control models and technologies. ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"137-148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the ... ACM symposium on access control models and technologies. ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2462410.2462413\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ... ACM symposium on access control models and technologies. ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2462410.2462413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

基于模型的安全工程使用正式的安全模型来指定和分析访问控制系统。基于工具的模型分析在这里遇到了一个根本性的困难:一方面,现实世界的访问控制系统通常非常庞大和复杂,需要具有高表达能力的模型。另一方面,对这些模型的分析经常受到计算复杂性甚至不可判定性的困扰,这使得为自动分析工具设计算法变得困难。解决这个问题的一种方法是限制建模演算的表达能力,从而限制可以建模的应用程序场景的范围。在本文中,我们提出了一种不同的方法:基于启发式的方法来分析具有充分表达能力的访问控制模型的安全特性。针对通用性,本文重点研究了基于hru风格的基于自动机的访问控制模型的沿袭,这些模型是对当代基于角色或基于属性的访问控制系统的动态行为建模的基础。本文提出了一种基于启发式的模型分析方法,详细描述了启发式模型安全分析算法,并讨论了其计算复杂度。该算法是安全策略工程工作台中安全模型分析工具的核心;给出了其基于启发式的符号模型执行引擎的主要组成部分的形式化描述,并评估了其分析复杂现实世界访问控制系统的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Heuristic safety analysis of access control models
Model-based security engineering uses formal security models for specifying and analyzing access control systems. Tool-based model analysis encounters a fundamental difficulty here: on the one hand, real-world access control systems generally are quite large and complex and require models that have high expressive power. On the other hand, analysis of such models is often pestered by computational complexity or even non-decidability, making it difficult to devise algorithms for automated analysis tools. One approach to this problem is to limiting the expressive power of the modeling calculus, resulting in restrictions to the spectrum of application scenarios that can be modeled. In this paper we propose a different approach: a heuristic-based method for analyzing the safety properties of access control models with full expressive power. Aiming at generality, the paper focuses on the lineage of HRU-style, automaton-based access control models that are fundamental for modeling the dynamic behavior of contemporary role-based or attribute-based access control systems. The paper motivates a heuristics-based approach to model analysis, describes in detail a heuristic model safety analysis algorithm, and discusses its computational complexity. The algorithm is the core of a security model analysis tool within the context of a security policy engineering workbench; a formal description of major components of its heuristic-based symbolic model execution engine is given, and its capacity to analyze complex real-world access control systems is evaluated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sidecar-based Path-aware Security for Microservices Poster: How to Raise a Robot - Beyond Access Control Constraints in Assistive Humanoid Robots Demo: A Multimodal Behavioral Biometric Scheme for Smartphone User Authentication (MBBS) Qualitative Intention-aware Attribute-based Access Control Policy Refinement SpaceMediator: Leveraging Authorization Policies to Prevent Spatial and Privacy Attacks in Mobile Augmented Reality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1