简支梁与钢筋混凝土梁理论挠度与实际挠度的比较研究

Sócrates Muñoz, Angel Antonio Ruiz Pico, Juan Manuel Anton Perez, Dandy B. Roca-Loayza
{"title":"简支梁与钢筋混凝土梁理论挠度与实际挠度的比较研究","authors":"Sócrates Muñoz, Angel Antonio Ruiz Pico, Juan Manuel Anton Perez, Dandy B. Roca-Loayza","doi":"10.15446/ING.INVESTIG.V41N2.86742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this research is to determine the real deflection of a concrete joist and correlate the result with theoretical deflection, which is based on a stress vs. deformation model which was proposed by Mander et al. (1988) for monotonic loads of reinforced and non-reinforced concrete. The construction of a concrete joist does not result in a 100% homogenous, isotropic, and linearly elastic element, since its production depends on many conditions, such as aggregate selection, water, cement manufacturing, tests performed for mixture design, the operator in charge of the mixture, and the construction of the joist. Therefore, research was carried out on the variation of real reflection with respect to theoretical calculations. To this effect, 30 simple-concrete and 30 reinforced-concrete joists were elaborated. They were tested by measuring their maximum deflection and comparing it to its theoretical counterpart. To calculate the theoretical deflection, a curvature moment diagram was elaborated with the Rect_Mom software by Restrepo and Rodríguez (2012), which uses the model by Mander et al. (1988). Experimental results showed a greater deflection than the one reported by theoretical calculations.","PeriodicalId":21285,"journal":{"name":"Revista Ingenieria E Investigacion","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of theoretical and real deflection of a simple and reinforced concret joist\",\"authors\":\"Sócrates Muñoz, Angel Antonio Ruiz Pico, Juan Manuel Anton Perez, Dandy B. Roca-Loayza\",\"doi\":\"10.15446/ING.INVESTIG.V41N2.86742\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this research is to determine the real deflection of a concrete joist and correlate the result with theoretical deflection, which is based on a stress vs. deformation model which was proposed by Mander et al. (1988) for monotonic loads of reinforced and non-reinforced concrete. The construction of a concrete joist does not result in a 100% homogenous, isotropic, and linearly elastic element, since its production depends on many conditions, such as aggregate selection, water, cement manufacturing, tests performed for mixture design, the operator in charge of the mixture, and the construction of the joist. Therefore, research was carried out on the variation of real reflection with respect to theoretical calculations. To this effect, 30 simple-concrete and 30 reinforced-concrete joists were elaborated. They were tested by measuring their maximum deflection and comparing it to its theoretical counterpart. To calculate the theoretical deflection, a curvature moment diagram was elaborated with the Rect_Mom software by Restrepo and Rodríguez (2012), which uses the model by Mander et al. (1988). Experimental results showed a greater deflection than the one reported by theoretical calculations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Ingenieria E Investigacion\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Ingenieria E Investigacion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15446/ING.INVESTIG.V41N2.86742\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Ingenieria E Investigacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15446/ING.INVESTIG.V41N2.86742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究的目的是确定混凝土托梁的实际挠度,并将结果与理论挠度相关联,理论挠度是基于Mander等人(1988)提出的应力与变形模型,该模型用于钢筋和非钢筋混凝土的单调荷载。混凝土托梁的施工不会产生100%均匀、各向同性和线性弹性的元件,因为它的生产取决于许多条件,例如骨料选择、水、水泥制造、为混合料设计进行的测试、负责混合料的操作员以及托梁的施工。因此,对实际反射相对于理论计算的变化进行了研究。为此,设计了30根简单混凝土和30根钢筋混凝土托梁。通过测量它们的最大挠度并将其与理论对应物进行比较,对它们进行了测试。为了计算理论挠度,使用Restrepo和Rodríguez(2012)的Rect_Mom软件制作了曲率力矩图,该软件使用了Mander等人(1988)的模型。实验结果表明,其挠度比理论计算结果更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative study of theoretical and real deflection of a simple and reinforced concret joist
The objective of this research is to determine the real deflection of a concrete joist and correlate the result with theoretical deflection, which is based on a stress vs. deformation model which was proposed by Mander et al. (1988) for monotonic loads of reinforced and non-reinforced concrete. The construction of a concrete joist does not result in a 100% homogenous, isotropic, and linearly elastic element, since its production depends on many conditions, such as aggregate selection, water, cement manufacturing, tests performed for mixture design, the operator in charge of the mixture, and the construction of the joist. Therefore, research was carried out on the variation of real reflection with respect to theoretical calculations. To this effect, 30 simple-concrete and 30 reinforced-concrete joists were elaborated. They were tested by measuring their maximum deflection and comparing it to its theoretical counterpart. To calculate the theoretical deflection, a curvature moment diagram was elaborated with the Rect_Mom software by Restrepo and Rodríguez (2012), which uses the model by Mander et al. (1988). Experimental results showed a greater deflection than the one reported by theoretical calculations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Study on the Performance and Emission Characteristics of a Diesel Engine Operated with Ternary Higher Alcohol Biofuel Blends A Gender Gap Analysis on Academic Performance in Engineering Students on Admission and Exit Standardized Tests Identification of Eroded and Erosion Risk Areas Using Remote Sensing and GIS in the Quebrada Seca watershed A Hybrid-Flipped Classroom Approach: Students’ Perception and Performance Assessment Towards a Theory of Interoperability of Software Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1