在文艺复兴中移动:约翰·斯托《伦敦概览》与本·琼森《徒步旅行》的修辞生态

IF 0.1 4区 艺术学 N/A FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION FILM CRITICISM Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1353/crt.2022.0007
P. Reid
{"title":"在文艺复兴中移动:约翰·斯托《伦敦概览》与本·琼森《徒步旅行》的修辞生态","authors":"P. Reid","doi":"10.1353/crt.2022.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Critical phenomenologies of space and sensation often represent them as forms of popular liberation because they draw from the modernist theories of Henri Lefebvre and Michel de Certeau. However, a historical phenomenology of movement through space in two early modern period's walking texts—as rhetorical ecologies—reveal public spaces and their sensations as controversial and uncanny landscapes bound by historical and cultural practice. This analysis employs John Stow's 1598 Survey of London and the recently discovered 1618 \"Foot Voyage\" of Ben Jonson from London to Edinburgh as case studies for phenomenal experiences of space in Renaissance cultural history.","PeriodicalId":42834,"journal":{"name":"FILM CRITICISM","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moving in the Renaissance: The Rhetorical Ecologies of John Stow's Survey of London and Ben Jonson's \\\"Foot Voyage\\\"\",\"authors\":\"P. Reid\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/crt.2022.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Critical phenomenologies of space and sensation often represent them as forms of popular liberation because they draw from the modernist theories of Henri Lefebvre and Michel de Certeau. However, a historical phenomenology of movement through space in two early modern period's walking texts—as rhetorical ecologies—reveal public spaces and their sensations as controversial and uncanny landscapes bound by historical and cultural practice. This analysis employs John Stow's 1598 Survey of London and the recently discovered 1618 \\\"Foot Voyage\\\" of Ben Jonson from London to Edinburgh as case studies for phenomenal experiences of space in Renaissance cultural history.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FILM CRITICISM\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FILM CRITICISM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/crt.2022.0007\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FILM CRITICISM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/crt.2022.0007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:批判的空间现象学和感觉现象学常常把它们描绘成大众解放的形式,因为它们借鉴了列斐伏尔和塞托的现代主义理论。然而,在两个早期现代的行走文本中,一种通过空间运动的历史现象学——作为修辞生态学——揭示了公共空间及其感觉是受历史和文化实践束缚的充满争议和神秘的景观。这一分析采用了约翰·斯托1598年的《伦敦调查》和最近发现的1618年本·琼森从伦敦到爱丁堡的“徒步旅行”,作为文艺复兴文化史上空间现象体验的案例研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Moving in the Renaissance: The Rhetorical Ecologies of John Stow's Survey of London and Ben Jonson's "Foot Voyage"
Abstract:Critical phenomenologies of space and sensation often represent them as forms of popular liberation because they draw from the modernist theories of Henri Lefebvre and Michel de Certeau. However, a historical phenomenology of movement through space in two early modern period's walking texts—as rhetorical ecologies—reveal public spaces and their sensations as controversial and uncanny landscapes bound by historical and cultural practice. This analysis employs John Stow's 1598 Survey of London and the recently discovered 1618 "Foot Voyage" of Ben Jonson from London to Edinburgh as case studies for phenomenal experiences of space in Renaissance cultural history.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
FILM CRITICISM
FILM CRITICISM FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Film Criticism is a peer-reviewed, online publication whose aim is to bring together scholarship in the field of cinema and media studies in order to present the finest work in this area, foregrounding textual criticism as a primary value. Our readership is academic, although we strive to publish material that is both accessible to undergraduates and engaging to established scholars. With over 40 years of continuous publication, Film Criticism is the third oldest academic film journal in the United States. We have published work by such international scholars as Dudley Andrew, David Bordwell, David Cook, Andrew Horton, Ann Kaplan, Marcia Landy, Peter Lehman, Janet Staiger, and Robin Wood. Equally important, FC continues to present work from emerging generations of film and media scholars representing multiple critical, cultural and theoretical perspectives. Film Criticism is an open access academic journal that allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, and link to the full texts of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose except where otherwise noted.
期刊最新文献
Fast Zombies and Social Rights: The Case of Umberto Lenzi’s Nightmare City (1980) Neo-Imperial Island Fantasy in Contemporary French Reality TV: The Case of Koh-Lanta The Guilty Spectator: Sexuality, Age, Crime and Dario Argento’s Deep Red (1975) “To Become a Devil”: Special Effects, Magic Tricks, and the Technological Image in Faust Transforming Cultural Memory: Inglorius Basterds (2009)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1