抗精神病药物治疗二级医院精神分裂症患者的成本-效果

Yunita Andriani, Frisca Nindy Septiani, Defirson Defirson
{"title":"抗精神病药物治疗二级医院精神分裂症患者的成本-效果","authors":"Yunita Andriani, Frisca Nindy Septiani, Defirson Defirson","doi":"10.32734/IDJPCR.V2I2.454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Schizophrenia is a chronic disease that requires relatively high treatment costs [1]. Several studies have found that atypical antipsychotics are more effective compared to typical antipsychotics. As a result, the duration of treatment and the patients’ length of hospital stay will be shorter which ultimately reduce the overall treatment costs.  Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of the two classes of antipsychotic drugs in the treatment of schizophrenia inpatients admitted to  Jambi Province Hospital period 2013-2016. Method: This descriptive retrospective cohort study was undertaken to analyze cost-effectiveness of the antipsychotic drugs provided to patients with schizophrenia (n=910) admitted to Jambi Province Hospital from the perspective of a healthcare provider. using purposive sampling technique. Characteristics of the patients, antipsychotic drugs usage, costs consumed, and treatment outcome were extracted from the hospital databases. Results: It was found that the total ACER value of the typical antipsychotic group was Rp. 142,789.25 and atypical antipsychotics is IDR 163,045.50 which indicates that the typical ACER antipsychotic value is  smaller than  those of atypical antipsychotics based on the length of stay of patients in the Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) room. Whereas based on the PANSS-EC score of the patient, the total ACER value of the typical antipsychotic group was IDR1,189,910.42 and in atypical antipsychotics was IDR. 572,089.47. Conclusion: Atypical antipsychotics are more cost-effective than typical antipsychotics.","PeriodicalId":13466,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-effectiveness of Antipsychotics in Treatment of Schizophrenia Patients admitted to a secondary Hospital\",\"authors\":\"Yunita Andriani, Frisca Nindy Septiani, Defirson Defirson\",\"doi\":\"10.32734/IDJPCR.V2I2.454\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. Schizophrenia is a chronic disease that requires relatively high treatment costs [1]. Several studies have found that atypical antipsychotics are more effective compared to typical antipsychotics. As a result, the duration of treatment and the patients’ length of hospital stay will be shorter which ultimately reduce the overall treatment costs.  Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of the two classes of antipsychotic drugs in the treatment of schizophrenia inpatients admitted to  Jambi Province Hospital period 2013-2016. Method: This descriptive retrospective cohort study was undertaken to analyze cost-effectiveness of the antipsychotic drugs provided to patients with schizophrenia (n=910) admitted to Jambi Province Hospital from the perspective of a healthcare provider. using purposive sampling technique. Characteristics of the patients, antipsychotic drugs usage, costs consumed, and treatment outcome were extracted from the hospital databases. Results: It was found that the total ACER value of the typical antipsychotic group was Rp. 142,789.25 and atypical antipsychotics is IDR 163,045.50 which indicates that the typical ACER antipsychotic value is  smaller than  those of atypical antipsychotics based on the length of stay of patients in the Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) room. Whereas based on the PANSS-EC score of the patient, the total ACER value of the typical antipsychotic group was IDR1,189,910.42 and in atypical antipsychotics was IDR. 572,089.47. Conclusion: Atypical antipsychotics are more cost-effective than typical antipsychotics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indonesian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indonesian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32734/IDJPCR.V2I2.454\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32734/IDJPCR.V2I2.454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要精神分裂症是一种治疗费用较高的慢性疾病[1]。一些研究发现,非典型抗精神病药物比典型抗精神病药物更有效。因此,治疗时间和患者的住院时间将缩短,最终降低整体治疗成本。因此,有必要对两类抗精神病药物治疗占碑省医院2013-2016年住院精神分裂症患者进行成本-效果分析(CEA)。方法:采用描述性回顾性队列研究,从医疗服务提供者的角度分析占碑省医院收治的精神分裂症患者(n=910)抗精神病药物的成本-效果。使用有目的的抽样技术。从医院数据库中提取患者的特征、抗精神病药物的使用、消耗的费用和治疗结果。结果:典型抗精神病药物组的ACER总值为142,789.25卢比,非典型抗精神病药物组的ACER总值为163,045.50卢比,从患者在精神科重症监护病房(PICU)的住院时间来看,典型抗精神病药物组的ACER总值小于非典型抗精神病药物组。而根据患者的PANSS-EC评分,典型抗精神病药物组的总ACER值为IDR1,189,910.42,非典型抗精神病药物组为IDR。572089 .47点。结论:非典型抗精神病药物比典型抗精神病药物更具成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cost-effectiveness of Antipsychotics in Treatment of Schizophrenia Patients admitted to a secondary Hospital
Abstract. Schizophrenia is a chronic disease that requires relatively high treatment costs [1]. Several studies have found that atypical antipsychotics are more effective compared to typical antipsychotics. As a result, the duration of treatment and the patients’ length of hospital stay will be shorter which ultimately reduce the overall treatment costs.  Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of the two classes of antipsychotic drugs in the treatment of schizophrenia inpatients admitted to  Jambi Province Hospital period 2013-2016. Method: This descriptive retrospective cohort study was undertaken to analyze cost-effectiveness of the antipsychotic drugs provided to patients with schizophrenia (n=910) admitted to Jambi Province Hospital from the perspective of a healthcare provider. using purposive sampling technique. Characteristics of the patients, antipsychotic drugs usage, costs consumed, and treatment outcome were extracted from the hospital databases. Results: It was found that the total ACER value of the typical antipsychotic group was Rp. 142,789.25 and atypical antipsychotics is IDR 163,045.50 which indicates that the typical ACER antipsychotic value is  smaller than  those of atypical antipsychotics based on the length of stay of patients in the Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) room. Whereas based on the PANSS-EC score of the patient, the total ACER value of the typical antipsychotic group was IDR1,189,910.42 and in atypical antipsychotics was IDR. 572,089.47. Conclusion: Atypical antipsychotics are more cost-effective than typical antipsychotics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of antihypertensive drug utilization in community health centre and type B teaching hospital Herbal Medicines and Recent Development on Novel Herbal Drug Delivery System Prevalence, management and complications of diabetic patients in pabna city Proximate Composition of Anadara granosa and Paphia undulata Carbohydrate Content in Packaged Chicken Nuggets: Qualitative And Quantitative Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1