从代议制到激进派:新颖的参与形式如何改革民主并降低生存风险

IF 1.8 4区 经济学 Q2 URBAN STUDIES Urban Research & Practice Pub Date : 2022-08-25 DOI:10.1080/17535069.2022.2097645
J. Herbert
{"title":"从代议制到激进派:新颖的参与形式如何改革民主并降低生存风险","authors":"J. Herbert","doi":"10.1080/17535069.2022.2097645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Existential risk is higher than is commonly thought. This risk can be reduced by improving our democratic processes and institutions. Local government has the opportunity, and therefore the responsibility, to experiment in this field. To inform this experimentation, this paper will discuss two novel types of participation. First, representative deliberative processes that reintroduce the Ancient Athenian practice of random selection, updating it wth modern statistical methods to ensure representativeness. Second, the ‘radical’ processes advocated for by RadicalxChange that permit mass participation but use a quadratic formula to accurately determine the strength of preferences, and not just their direction.","PeriodicalId":46604,"journal":{"name":"Urban Research & Practice","volume":"144 1","pages":"127 - 138"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From the representative to the radical: how novel forms of participation can reform democracy and reduce existential risk\",\"authors\":\"J. Herbert\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17535069.2022.2097645\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Existential risk is higher than is commonly thought. This risk can be reduced by improving our democratic processes and institutions. Local government has the opportunity, and therefore the responsibility, to experiment in this field. To inform this experimentation, this paper will discuss two novel types of participation. First, representative deliberative processes that reintroduce the Ancient Athenian practice of random selection, updating it wth modern statistical methods to ensure representativeness. Second, the ‘radical’ processes advocated for by RadicalxChange that permit mass participation but use a quadratic formula to accurately determine the strength of preferences, and not just their direction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Research & Practice\",\"volume\":\"144 1\",\"pages\":\"127 - 138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Research & Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2022.2097645\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Research & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2022.2097645","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生存风险比人们通常认为的要高。这种风险可以通过改善我们的民主进程和体制来减少。地方政府有机会,因此也有责任在这一领域进行试验。为了给这个实验提供信息,本文将讨论两种新颖的参与类型。首先,代表性审议过程重新引入了古代雅典的随机选择实践,并使用现代统计方法对其进行更新,以确保代表性。其次,radicicalxchange倡导的“激进”过程允许大众参与,但使用二次公式来准确确定偏好的强度,而不仅仅是他们的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From the representative to the radical: how novel forms of participation can reform democracy and reduce existential risk
ABSTRACT Existential risk is higher than is commonly thought. This risk can be reduced by improving our democratic processes and institutions. Local government has the opportunity, and therefore the responsibility, to experiment in this field. To inform this experimentation, this paper will discuss two novel types of participation. First, representative deliberative processes that reintroduce the Ancient Athenian practice of random selection, updating it wth modern statistical methods to ensure representativeness. Second, the ‘radical’ processes advocated for by RadicalxChange that permit mass participation but use a quadratic formula to accurately determine the strength of preferences, and not just their direction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urban Research & Practice
Urban Research & Practice URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
Developer-driven co-housing in Denmark: strengths and weaknesses compared to resident-driven co-housing Shared challenges, divergent practices. The impact of institutional frameworks on area-based initiatives in Barcelona and Paris Evaluating ‘pocket’ public spaces in Al Wehdat refugee camp, Jordan: challenges and opportunities Urban policy in the framework of the 2030 agenda: balance and perspectives from Latin America and Europe The urban now: living in an age of urban globalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1