是什么决定了政府指导非营利组织的政策工具选择?政府能力的作用与环境复杂性

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES Journal of Asian Public Policy Pub Date : 2021-10-14 DOI:10.1080/17516234.2021.1991254
Zejin Liu, S. Van de Walle
{"title":"是什么决定了政府指导非营利组织的政策工具选择?政府能力的作用与环境复杂性","authors":"Zejin Liu, S. Van de Walle","doi":"10.1080/17516234.2021.1991254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article investigates the factors that account for variation in the use of policy instruments for steering NPOs across Chinese provinces. Drawing on instrument choice theory, this article advances a theoretical framework that links government capacity and contextual complexity to variation in government instrument choice. Pooling five-year data from 26 Chinese provinces, two panel regression models are estimated to examine the variation in provinces’ use of regulatory and incentive instruments for steering NPOs. The findings indicate that provinces’ use of these two categories of policy instruments is not predetermined but bounded by their own government resources and external contextual factors.","PeriodicalId":45051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asian Public Policy","volume":"40 1","pages":"182 - 198"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What determines the government’s policy instrument choice for steering nonprofit organizations? The role of government capacity and contextual complexity\",\"authors\":\"Zejin Liu, S. Van de Walle\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17516234.2021.1991254\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article investigates the factors that account for variation in the use of policy instruments for steering NPOs across Chinese provinces. Drawing on instrument choice theory, this article advances a theoretical framework that links government capacity and contextual complexity to variation in government instrument choice. Pooling five-year data from 26 Chinese provinces, two panel regression models are estimated to examine the variation in provinces’ use of regulatory and incentive instruments for steering NPOs. The findings indicate that provinces’ use of these two categories of policy instruments is not predetermined but bounded by their own government resources and external contextual factors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Asian Public Policy\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"182 - 198\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Asian Public Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2021.1991254\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asian Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2021.1991254","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本文探讨了影响中国各省非营利组织政策工具使用差异的因素。本文借鉴工具选择理论,提出了一个将政府能力和情境复杂性与政府工具选择变化联系起来的理论框架。汇集了中国26个省份的5年数据,估计了两个面板回归模型,以检查各省使用监管和激励工具来指导非营利组织的差异。研究结果表明,各省对这两类政策工具的使用并不是预先确定的,而是受到其自身政府资源和外部背景因素的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What determines the government’s policy instrument choice for steering nonprofit organizations? The role of government capacity and contextual complexity
ABSTRACT This article investigates the factors that account for variation in the use of policy instruments for steering NPOs across Chinese provinces. Drawing on instrument choice theory, this article advances a theoretical framework that links government capacity and contextual complexity to variation in government instrument choice. Pooling five-year data from 26 Chinese provinces, two panel regression models are estimated to examine the variation in provinces’ use of regulatory and incentive instruments for steering NPOs. The findings indicate that provinces’ use of these two categories of policy instruments is not predetermined but bounded by their own government resources and external contextual factors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
The effect of incentives and procedure simplification in policy implementation: evidence from a survey experiment on waste sorting Situated usage of generative AI in policy education: implications for teaching, learning, and research Scaling up policy entrepreneurship strategies from the local to the national level: the unlikely rise of basic income from agenda universe to decision agenda Unveiling the impact of policy entrepreneurs on South Korea’s social economy: a media analysis Digital regulation, enforcement attitudes, and discretionary decision-making of regulatory street-level bureaucrats during a pandemic emergency: an experimental study in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1