Barry和Øverland负责歌手和助手的工作

IF 0.5 3区哲学 Q4 ETHICS Ethics & Global Politics Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1080/16544951.2019.1565601

K. Lippert‐Rasmussen

{"title":"Barry和Øverland负责歌手和助手的工作","authors":"K. Lippert‐Rasmussen","doi":"10.1080/16544951.2019.1565601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Barry and Øverland reject Singer’s assistance principle as being too demanding and offer a positive defence of a less demanding one. In this article, I critically scrutinize their arguments. My main claim is that they fail to show that their own principle of assistance is superior to more demanding ones such as Singer’s.","PeriodicalId":55964,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & Global Politics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barry and Øverland on Singer and assistance-based duties\",\"authors\":\"K. Lippert‐Rasmussen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/16544951.2019.1565601\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Barry and Øverland reject Singer’s assistance principle as being too demanding and offer a positive defence of a less demanding one. In this article, I critically scrutinize their arguments. My main claim is that they fail to show that their own principle of assistance is superior to more demanding ones such as Singer’s.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethics & Global Politics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethics & Global Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/16544951.2019.1565601\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics & Global Politics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16544951.2019.1565601","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

巴里和Øverland认为辛格的援助原则要求过高，并为要求较低的原则提供了积极的辩护。在这篇文章中，我对他们的论点进行了批判性的审视。我的主要观点是，他们未能证明他们自己的援助原则优于辛格等要求更高的原则。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Barry and Øverland on Singer and assistance-based duties

ABSTRACT Barry and Øverland reject Singer’s assistance principle as being too demanding and offer a positive defence of a less demanding one. In this article, I critically scrutinize their arguments. My main claim is that they fail to show that their own principle of assistance is superior to more demanding ones such as Singer’s.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊