作为环境保护机制的人权

Josselyn Espinoza Bautista
{"title":"作为环境保护机制的人权","authors":"Josselyn Espinoza Bautista","doi":"10.18272/lr.v6i1.1398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Inter-American Court of Human Rights, on November 15th of 2017, issued an Advisory Opinion on the environment and human rights. The relevance of this Opinion is reflected in the development made by the Court on state obligations in relation to the environment. The Court recognized the “undeniable relationship between the protection of the environment and the realization of other human rights.” In this virtue, this article seeks to scrutinize and synthesize the foundations of the Advisory Opinion. Finally, since advisory opinions are not binding nor obligatory for Ecuador (or any other state), this article develops an analysis on one possible solution (conventionality control) for the inclusion of the Advisory Opinion 23/17 in the Ecuadorian legal system.","PeriodicalId":34079,"journal":{"name":"USFQ Law Review","volume":"24 10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human Rights As a Protection Mechanism for the Environment\",\"authors\":\"Josselyn Espinoza Bautista\",\"doi\":\"10.18272/lr.v6i1.1398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Inter-American Court of Human Rights, on November 15th of 2017, issued an Advisory Opinion on the environment and human rights. The relevance of this Opinion is reflected in the development made by the Court on state obligations in relation to the environment. The Court recognized the “undeniable relationship between the protection of the environment and the realization of other human rights.” In this virtue, this article seeks to scrutinize and synthesize the foundations of the Advisory Opinion. Finally, since advisory opinions are not binding nor obligatory for Ecuador (or any other state), this article develops an analysis on one possible solution (conventionality control) for the inclusion of the Advisory Opinion 23/17 in the Ecuadorian legal system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"USFQ Law Review\",\"volume\":\"24 10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"USFQ Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18272/lr.v6i1.1398\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"USFQ Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18272/lr.v6i1.1398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2017年11月15日,美洲人权法院就环境与人权问题发表咨询意见。本意见的相关性反映在法院就国家在环境方面的义务所作的发展上。法院承认“保护环境与实现其他人权之间存在着不可否认的关系”。基于这一优点,本文试图审查和综合咨询意见的基础。最后,由于咨询意见对厄瓜多尔(或任何其他国家)没有约束力或强制性,本文分析了将咨询意见23/17纳入厄瓜多尔法律体系的一种可能解决方案(传统控制)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Human Rights As a Protection Mechanism for the Environment
The Inter-American Court of Human Rights, on November 15th of 2017, issued an Advisory Opinion on the environment and human rights. The relevance of this Opinion is reflected in the development made by the Court on state obligations in relation to the environment. The Court recognized the “undeniable relationship between the protection of the environment and the realization of other human rights.” In this virtue, this article seeks to scrutinize and synthesize the foundations of the Advisory Opinion. Finally, since advisory opinions are not binding nor obligatory for Ecuador (or any other state), this article develops an analysis on one possible solution (conventionality control) for the inclusion of the Advisory Opinion 23/17 in the Ecuadorian legal system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
implementación del arbitraje acelerado CNUDMI en Ecuador, ¿es necesario reformar la LAM? Acciones de incumplimiento planteadas por entidades corporativas en la Comunidad Andina: entre la flexibilidad y la cautela El Orden Público y la Convención de Nueva York ¿Qué nos dice sobre la denegación de ejecución de un laudo? Alcance del sandbox regulatorio en empresas Fintech en Ecuador Cosa juzgada formal y material en el juicio ejecutivo: ¿se puede intentar el mismo procedimiento si se han acogido excepciones propias del título?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1