全喉切除术后嗓音的外科康复

IF 0.3 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Hearing Balance and Communication Pub Date : 2021-12-03 DOI:10.1080/21695717.2021.2020511
C. Grillo, L. Maiolino, A. Borragán Torre, I. La Mantia
{"title":"全喉切除术后嗓音的外科康复","authors":"C. Grillo, L. Maiolino, A. Borragán Torre, I. La Mantia","doi":"10.1080/21695717.2021.2020511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction Almost 150 years after the first surgery, total laryngectomy continues to be the surgery of choice for advanced stage laryngeal tumours as well as for the revision of therapeutic failures of radiotherapy that cannot be resolved with other types of partial procedures. Materials and methods Our study was conducted at the University Hospital of Catania, from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2020. Voice prosthesis following tracheoesophageal puncture was performed as a primary choice in 13 cases while as a secondary procedure in 29 cases. The use of the oesophageal voice through adequate rehabilitation, on the other hand, was the choice for 15 patients. Results The VrQoL questionnaire revealed significantly better results in both the Socio-Emotional and Functional domains of the group of patients who underwent voice rehabilitation via voice prosthesis after TEP compared to the group rehabilitated via oesophageal voice. The V-RQoL score showed a worsening of the well-being indices among the patients who had tracheoesophageal fistula related disorders at the control compared to the group rehabilitated with the oesophageal voice. Discussion Tracheo-oesophageal puncture (TEP) with voice prosthesis (VP) insertion is currently considered the technique of choice for restoring a voice as close as possible to the pre-laryngectomy. It should also be considered that this type of device also offers excellent performance from a psychological point of view, making this type of intervention the best accepted by patients in terms not only of phoniatric but also of improving the quality of life.","PeriodicalId":43765,"journal":{"name":"Hearing Balance and Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical rehabilitation of the voice post total laryngectomy\",\"authors\":\"C. Grillo, L. Maiolino, A. Borragán Torre, I. La Mantia\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21695717.2021.2020511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Introduction Almost 150 years after the first surgery, total laryngectomy continues to be the surgery of choice for advanced stage laryngeal tumours as well as for the revision of therapeutic failures of radiotherapy that cannot be resolved with other types of partial procedures. Materials and methods Our study was conducted at the University Hospital of Catania, from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2020. Voice prosthesis following tracheoesophageal puncture was performed as a primary choice in 13 cases while as a secondary procedure in 29 cases. The use of the oesophageal voice through adequate rehabilitation, on the other hand, was the choice for 15 patients. Results The VrQoL questionnaire revealed significantly better results in both the Socio-Emotional and Functional domains of the group of patients who underwent voice rehabilitation via voice prosthesis after TEP compared to the group rehabilitated via oesophageal voice. The V-RQoL score showed a worsening of the well-being indices among the patients who had tracheoesophageal fistula related disorders at the control compared to the group rehabilitated with the oesophageal voice. Discussion Tracheo-oesophageal puncture (TEP) with voice prosthesis (VP) insertion is currently considered the technique of choice for restoring a voice as close as possible to the pre-laryngectomy. It should also be considered that this type of device also offers excellent performance from a psychological point of view, making this type of intervention the best accepted by patients in terms not only of phoniatric but also of improving the quality of life.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hearing Balance and Communication\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hearing Balance and Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21695717.2021.2020511\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hearing Balance and Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21695717.2021.2020511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在第一次手术后近150年,全喉切除术仍然是晚期喉部肿瘤的首选手术,也是其他类型的部分手术无法解决的放疗治疗失败的修正手术。材料和方法本研究于2010年1月1日至2020年12月31日在卡塔尼亚大学医院进行。气管食管穿刺后假声13例为首选手术,29例为辅助手术。另一方面,通过适当的康复使用食道声音是15例患者的选择。结果VrQoL问卷调查结果显示,TEP术后假声康复组在社会情绪和功能方面均明显优于食道语音康复组。V-RQoL评分显示,对照组气管食管瘘相关疾病患者的幸福感指数较食管声带康复组有所下降。气管-食管穿刺(TEP)与假声(VP)插入是目前被认为是恢复声音尽可能接近喉切除术前的首选技术。还应该考虑到,从心理学的角度来看,这种类型的设备也提供了出色的性能,使这种类型的干预不仅在语音方面而且在改善生活质量方面最被患者接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Surgical rehabilitation of the voice post total laryngectomy
Abstract Introduction Almost 150 years after the first surgery, total laryngectomy continues to be the surgery of choice for advanced stage laryngeal tumours as well as for the revision of therapeutic failures of radiotherapy that cannot be resolved with other types of partial procedures. Materials and methods Our study was conducted at the University Hospital of Catania, from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2020. Voice prosthesis following tracheoesophageal puncture was performed as a primary choice in 13 cases while as a secondary procedure in 29 cases. The use of the oesophageal voice through adequate rehabilitation, on the other hand, was the choice for 15 patients. Results The VrQoL questionnaire revealed significantly better results in both the Socio-Emotional and Functional domains of the group of patients who underwent voice rehabilitation via voice prosthesis after TEP compared to the group rehabilitated via oesophageal voice. The V-RQoL score showed a worsening of the well-being indices among the patients who had tracheoesophageal fistula related disorders at the control compared to the group rehabilitated with the oesophageal voice. Discussion Tracheo-oesophageal puncture (TEP) with voice prosthesis (VP) insertion is currently considered the technique of choice for restoring a voice as close as possible to the pre-laryngectomy. It should also be considered that this type of device also offers excellent performance from a psychological point of view, making this type of intervention the best accepted by patients in terms not only of phoniatric but also of improving the quality of life.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hearing Balance and Communication
Hearing Balance and Communication AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
期刊最新文献
Comparison of quick speech-in-noise test and pure tone audiometry in noise-induced hearing loss Otolin-1 as a biomarker for the evaluation of the effectiveness of betahistine treatment for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo The effect of hearing loss on balance in subjects with cognitive disorders Effect of auditory deprivation on threshold of sound lateralization Assessment of spatial acuity in typically developing children: a comparative study of sound-field and closed-field sound source identification paradigms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1