告密者。蛇。摩尔。书。:检查对“内部/外部”研究人员在纠正中的反应

Talisa J. Carter, Chelsea Thomson
{"title":"告密者。蛇。摩尔。书。:检查对“内部/外部”研究人员在纠正中的反应","authors":"Talisa J. Carter, Chelsea Thomson","doi":"10.21428/88de04a1.e17dd06f","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Qualitative researchers face unique challenges when conducting original data collection within facilities of confinement. These challenges are shaped by a range of factors including the study’s research design, researcher identity, and organizational climate of the facility. Although the barriers of data collection in corrections are known, literature providing context, nuance, and recommendations for overcoming these obstacles is sparse, especially for qualitative fieldwork. This work addresses this gap by examining responses of correctional employees to observational research. During data collection, correctional staff called the primary author “snitch,” “snake,” “mole,” and “Books.” This paper investigates these labels and offers suggestions on how future researchers can navigate their experiences.","PeriodicalId":90621,"journal":{"name":"Journal of qualitative criminal justice & criminology : JQCJC","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Snitch. Snake. Mole. Books.: Examining Responses to “Insider/Outsider” Researchers in Corrections\",\"authors\":\"Talisa J. Carter, Chelsea Thomson\",\"doi\":\"10.21428/88de04a1.e17dd06f\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Qualitative researchers face unique challenges when conducting original data collection within facilities of confinement. These challenges are shaped by a range of factors including the study’s research design, researcher identity, and organizational climate of the facility. Although the barriers of data collection in corrections are known, literature providing context, nuance, and recommendations for overcoming these obstacles is sparse, especially for qualitative fieldwork. This work addresses this gap by examining responses of correctional employees to observational research. During data collection, correctional staff called the primary author “snitch,” “snake,” “mole,” and “Books.” This paper investigates these labels and offers suggestions on how future researchers can navigate their experiences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of qualitative criminal justice & criminology : JQCJC\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of qualitative criminal justice & criminology : JQCJC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21428/88de04a1.e17dd06f\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of qualitative criminal justice & criminology : JQCJC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21428/88de04a1.e17dd06f","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

定性研究人员在封闭设施内进行原始数据收集时面临着独特的挑战。这些挑战是由一系列因素形成的,包括研究的研究设计、研究人员的身份和设施的组织环境。虽然数据收集在纠正方面的障碍是已知的,但提供上下文、细微差别和克服这些障碍的建议的文献很少,特别是定性实地调查。这项工作通过检查惩教人员对观察性研究的反应来解决这一差距。在数据收集过程中,惩教人员称主要作者为“告密者”、“蛇”、“鼹鼠”和“书籍”。本文调查了这些标签,并为未来的研究人员如何驾驭他们的经历提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Snitch. Snake. Mole. Books.: Examining Responses to “Insider/Outsider” Researchers in Corrections
: Qualitative researchers face unique challenges when conducting original data collection within facilities of confinement. These challenges are shaped by a range of factors including the study’s research design, researcher identity, and organizational climate of the facility. Although the barriers of data collection in corrections are known, literature providing context, nuance, and recommendations for overcoming these obstacles is sparse, especially for qualitative fieldwork. This work addresses this gap by examining responses of correctional employees to observational research. During data collection, correctional staff called the primary author “snitch,” “snake,” “mole,” and “Books.” This paper investigates these labels and offers suggestions on how future researchers can navigate their experiences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Snitch. Snake. Mole. Books.: Examining Responses to “Insider/Outsider” Researchers in Corrections “Leave Your Pain Here:” an Illustration of Therapeutic Jurisprudence Through the Remarks of Judge Rosemarie Aquilina From The State of Michigan versus Lawrence Nassar White Supremacy and the Future of Liberal Democracy–the Case of the Nordic Resistance Movement Using a Trauma-Informed Practice Framework to Examine How South Australian Judges Respond to Trauma in the Lives of Aboriginal Defendants Social Supports for Community Corrections Clients: Risk Factors or Protective Factors?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1