具有细化类型的基于流的安全编程

Benno Stein, Lazaro Clapp, Manu Sridharan, B. E. Chang
{"title":"具有细化类型的基于流的安全编程","authors":"Benno Stein, Lazaro Clapp, Manu Sridharan, B. E. Chang","doi":"10.1145/3238147.3238174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In stream-based programming, data sources are abstracted as a stream of values that can be manipulated via callback functions. Stream-based programming is exploding in popularity, as it provides a powerful and expressive paradigm for handling asynchronous data sources in interactive software. However, high-level stream abstractions can also make it difficult for developers to reason about control- and data-flow relationships in their programs. This is particularly impactful when asynchronous stream-based code interacts with thread-limited features such as UI frameworks that restrict UI access to a single thread, since the threading behavior of streaming constructs is often non-intuitive and insufficiently documented. In this paper, we present a type-based approach that can statically prove the thread-safety of UI accesses in stream-based software. Our key insight is that the fluent APIs of stream-processing frameworks enable the tracking of threads via type-refinement, making it possible to reason automatically about what thread a piece of code runs on - a difficult problem in general. We implement the system as an annotation-based Java type-checker for Android programs built upon the popular ReactiveX framework and evaluate its efficacy by annotating and analyzing 8 open-source apps, where we find 33 instances of unsafe UI access while incurring an annotation burden of only one annotation per 186 source lines of code. We also report on our experience applying the typechecker to two much larger apps from the Uber Technologies, Inc. codebase, where it currently runs on every code change and blocks changes that introduce potential threading bugs.","PeriodicalId":6622,"journal":{"name":"2018 33rd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)","volume":"331 1","pages":"565-576"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safe Stream-Based Programming with Refinement Types\",\"authors\":\"Benno Stein, Lazaro Clapp, Manu Sridharan, B. E. Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3238147.3238174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In stream-based programming, data sources are abstracted as a stream of values that can be manipulated via callback functions. Stream-based programming is exploding in popularity, as it provides a powerful and expressive paradigm for handling asynchronous data sources in interactive software. However, high-level stream abstractions can also make it difficult for developers to reason about control- and data-flow relationships in their programs. This is particularly impactful when asynchronous stream-based code interacts with thread-limited features such as UI frameworks that restrict UI access to a single thread, since the threading behavior of streaming constructs is often non-intuitive and insufficiently documented. In this paper, we present a type-based approach that can statically prove the thread-safety of UI accesses in stream-based software. Our key insight is that the fluent APIs of stream-processing frameworks enable the tracking of threads via type-refinement, making it possible to reason automatically about what thread a piece of code runs on - a difficult problem in general. We implement the system as an annotation-based Java type-checker for Android programs built upon the popular ReactiveX framework and evaluate its efficacy by annotating and analyzing 8 open-source apps, where we find 33 instances of unsafe UI access while incurring an annotation burden of only one annotation per 186 source lines of code. We also report on our experience applying the typechecker to two much larger apps from the Uber Technologies, Inc. codebase, where it currently runs on every code change and blocks changes that introduce potential threading bugs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 33rd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)\",\"volume\":\"331 1\",\"pages\":\"565-576\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 33rd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3238147.3238174\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 33rd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3238147.3238174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

在基于流的编程中,数据源被抽象为可通过回调函数操作的值流。基于流的编程越来越受欢迎,因为它为在交互式软件中处理异步数据源提供了强大而富有表现力的范例。然而,高级流抽象也会使开发人员难以推断程序中的控制流和数据流关系。当基于异步流的代码与线程限制的特性(如限制UI访问单个线程的UI框架)交互时,这一点尤其有影响,因为流结构的线程行为通常不直观且没有充分的文档记录。本文提出了一种基于类型的方法,可以静态地证明基于流的软件中UI访问的线程安全性。我们的关键见解是,流处理框架的流畅api支持通过类型细化跟踪线程,从而可以自动推断出一段代码运行在哪个线程上——这通常是一个难题。我们将该系统实现为基于注释的Java类型检查器,用于基于流行的ReactiveX框架的Android程序,并通过注释和分析8个开源应用程序来评估其有效性,其中我们发现33个不安全的UI访问实例,而每186行源代码仅产生一个注释负担。我们还报告了我们将typechecker应用于Uber Technologies, Inc.代码库中的两个更大的应用程序的经验,它目前在每个代码更改上运行,并阻止引入潜在线程错误的更改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safe Stream-Based Programming with Refinement Types
In stream-based programming, data sources are abstracted as a stream of values that can be manipulated via callback functions. Stream-based programming is exploding in popularity, as it provides a powerful and expressive paradigm for handling asynchronous data sources in interactive software. However, high-level stream abstractions can also make it difficult for developers to reason about control- and data-flow relationships in their programs. This is particularly impactful when asynchronous stream-based code interacts with thread-limited features such as UI frameworks that restrict UI access to a single thread, since the threading behavior of streaming constructs is often non-intuitive and insufficiently documented. In this paper, we present a type-based approach that can statically prove the thread-safety of UI accesses in stream-based software. Our key insight is that the fluent APIs of stream-processing frameworks enable the tracking of threads via type-refinement, making it possible to reason automatically about what thread a piece of code runs on - a difficult problem in general. We implement the system as an annotation-based Java type-checker for Android programs built upon the popular ReactiveX framework and evaluate its efficacy by annotating and analyzing 8 open-source apps, where we find 33 instances of unsafe UI access while incurring an annotation burden of only one annotation per 186 source lines of code. We also report on our experience applying the typechecker to two much larger apps from the Uber Technologies, Inc. codebase, where it currently runs on every code change and blocks changes that introduce potential threading bugs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Automatically Testing Implementations of Numerical Abstract Domains Self-Protection of Android Systems from Inter-component Communication Attacks Characterizing the Natural Language Descriptions in Software Logging Statements DroidMate-2: A Platform for Android Test Generation CPA-SymExec: Efficient Symbolic Execution in CPAchecker
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1