Qi Liu, Dianchen Wang, Zhao-Li Sun, Jianwu Jiang, Yang Fu
{"title":"机器人辅助腹腔镜修补裂孔疝伴后凸:一例荟萃分析报告","authors":"Qi Liu, Dianchen Wang, Zhao-Li Sun, Jianwu Jiang, Yang Fu","doi":"10.4103/ijawhs.ijawhs_53_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Hiatal hernia is a high incidence disease, of which, partial patients requiring surgery have gastroesophageal reflux or dysphagia. Although minimally invasive surgery has been widely utilized in recent years, the optimal surgical therapy still remains controversial. In this study, we reported a kyphosis patient undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair and launched a meta-analysis aiming to evaluate the advantages of this surgery strategy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six databases (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ClincialTrials.gov database and Web of Science) were searched from inception to September 20, 2022. All studies describing the patients undergoing robotic hiatal hernia or laparoscopic hiatal hernia were included. And the meta-analysis was performed using R package meta (v6.0.0). RESULTS: We reported a 75-year-old female patient of short stature and with severe kyphosis was diagnosed with hiatal hernia and underwent a robotic surgery. For meta-analysis, 1,128 articles were identified in the initial database search, and among them, 6 articles were included in the final analysis. The results showed that robotic surgery had no advantage in operation time and intraoperative complications rate compared with traditional laparoscopic surgery (both P < 0.01). Regardless of the statistical significance, robotic surgery tended to have a lower conversion and postoperative complication rate, as well as the length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Robotics have some advantages in the surgical treatment of hiatal hernia compared with the conventional laparoscopic surgery, the use of which can facilitate the treatment for some challenging cases.","PeriodicalId":34200,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery","volume":"206 1","pages":"92 - 99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robot-assisted laparoscopic repair in hiatal hernia with kyphosis: A case report with meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Qi Liu, Dianchen Wang, Zhao-Li Sun, Jianwu Jiang, Yang Fu\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijawhs.ijawhs_53_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: Hiatal hernia is a high incidence disease, of which, partial patients requiring surgery have gastroesophageal reflux or dysphagia. Although minimally invasive surgery has been widely utilized in recent years, the optimal surgical therapy still remains controversial. In this study, we reported a kyphosis patient undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair and launched a meta-analysis aiming to evaluate the advantages of this surgery strategy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six databases (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ClincialTrials.gov database and Web of Science) were searched from inception to September 20, 2022. All studies describing the patients undergoing robotic hiatal hernia or laparoscopic hiatal hernia were included. And the meta-analysis was performed using R package meta (v6.0.0). RESULTS: We reported a 75-year-old female patient of short stature and with severe kyphosis was diagnosed with hiatal hernia and underwent a robotic surgery. For meta-analysis, 1,128 articles were identified in the initial database search, and among them, 6 articles were included in the final analysis. The results showed that robotic surgery had no advantage in operation time and intraoperative complications rate compared with traditional laparoscopic surgery (both P < 0.01). Regardless of the statistical significance, robotic surgery tended to have a lower conversion and postoperative complication rate, as well as the length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Robotics have some advantages in the surgical treatment of hiatal hernia compared with the conventional laparoscopic surgery, the use of which can facilitate the treatment for some challenging cases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery\",\"volume\":\"206 1\",\"pages\":\"92 - 99\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijawhs.ijawhs_53_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijawhs.ijawhs_53_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:裂孔疝是一种高发疾病,其中部分需要手术的患者存在胃食管反流或吞咽困难。尽管近年来微创手术得到了广泛的应用,但最佳的手术治疗方法仍然存在争议。在这项研究中,我们报道了一名接受机器人辅助腹腔镜裂孔疝修补术的后凸患者,并开展了一项荟萃分析,旨在评估这种手术策略的优势。材料和方法:检索了6个数据库(Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ClincialTrials.gov数据库和Web of Science),检索时间从研究开始到2022年9月20日。所有描述机器人裂孔疝或腹腔镜裂孔疝患者的研究均被纳入。meta分析使用R软件包meta (v6.0.0)进行。结果:我们报道了一位75岁的女性患者,身材矮小,严重后凸,被诊断为裂孔疝,并接受了机器人手术。meta分析在初始数据库检索中共检索到1128篇文章,其中6篇文章被纳入最终分析。结果显示,机器人手术在手术时间和术中并发症发生率方面与传统腹腔镜手术相比无明显优势(P < 0.01)。无论是否具有统计学意义,机器人手术往往具有较低的转换率和术后并发症发生率,以及住院时间。结论:与传统腹腔镜手术相比,机器人技术在裂孔疝手术治疗中具有一定的优势,可以为一些疑难病例的治疗提供便利。
Robot-assisted laparoscopic repair in hiatal hernia with kyphosis: A case report with meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Hiatal hernia is a high incidence disease, of which, partial patients requiring surgery have gastroesophageal reflux or dysphagia. Although minimally invasive surgery has been widely utilized in recent years, the optimal surgical therapy still remains controversial. In this study, we reported a kyphosis patient undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair and launched a meta-analysis aiming to evaluate the advantages of this surgery strategy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six databases (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ClincialTrials.gov database and Web of Science) were searched from inception to September 20, 2022. All studies describing the patients undergoing robotic hiatal hernia or laparoscopic hiatal hernia were included. And the meta-analysis was performed using R package meta (v6.0.0). RESULTS: We reported a 75-year-old female patient of short stature and with severe kyphosis was diagnosed with hiatal hernia and underwent a robotic surgery. For meta-analysis, 1,128 articles were identified in the initial database search, and among them, 6 articles were included in the final analysis. The results showed that robotic surgery had no advantage in operation time and intraoperative complications rate compared with traditional laparoscopic surgery (both P < 0.01). Regardless of the statistical significance, robotic surgery tended to have a lower conversion and postoperative complication rate, as well as the length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Robotics have some advantages in the surgical treatment of hiatal hernia compared with the conventional laparoscopic surgery, the use of which can facilitate the treatment for some challenging cases.