隔离传染病:伊丽莎白和詹姆士一世时期英格兰关于瘟疫和公共卫生的天意论辩论

IF 0.4 3区 社会学 Q4 MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING HUNTINGTON LIBRARY QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2022-02-22 DOI:10.1353/hlq.2021.0025
Kathryn Wolford
{"title":"隔离传染病:伊丽莎白和詹姆士一世时期英格兰关于瘟疫和公共卫生的天意论辩论","authors":"Kathryn Wolford","doi":"10.1353/hlq.2021.0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Despite repeated outbreaks of plague in the centuries following the Black Death, no consensus existed in England on the issues of how plague should be fought, how the infected should be cared for, and how the implementation of such measures would be funded. An abundance of printed texts emerged during the sixteenth century offering English readers information on what could and should be done to contain plague's spread. Ultimately their authors explained plague providentially, with many going so far as to claim that plague was entirely beyond the control of human actions. Placing the Tudor and Stuart Crowns' evolving quarantine policy into dialogue with the voices of clerics, physicians, philosophers, and poets who engaged with royal policy and at times offered substantial criticisms of it, this essay argues that the national imposition of quarantine provoked royal subjects to articulate and defend their own opinions about the practice, encouraging the development of popular political dialogue.","PeriodicalId":45445,"journal":{"name":"HUNTINGTON LIBRARY QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quarantining Contagion: Providentialist Debates over Plague and Public Health in Elizabethan and Jacobean England\",\"authors\":\"Kathryn Wolford\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/hlq.2021.0025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:Despite repeated outbreaks of plague in the centuries following the Black Death, no consensus existed in England on the issues of how plague should be fought, how the infected should be cared for, and how the implementation of such measures would be funded. An abundance of printed texts emerged during the sixteenth century offering English readers information on what could and should be done to contain plague's spread. Ultimately their authors explained plague providentially, with many going so far as to claim that plague was entirely beyond the control of human actions. Placing the Tudor and Stuart Crowns' evolving quarantine policy into dialogue with the voices of clerics, physicians, philosophers, and poets who engaged with royal policy and at times offered substantial criticisms of it, this essay argues that the national imposition of quarantine provoked royal subjects to articulate and defend their own opinions about the practice, encouraging the development of popular political dialogue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HUNTINGTON LIBRARY QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HUNTINGTON LIBRARY QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/hlq.2021.0025\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HUNTINGTON LIBRARY QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hlq.2021.0025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

尽管在黑死病之后的几个世纪里,鼠疫反复爆发,但在如何抗击鼠疫、如何照顾感染者以及如何为实施这些措施提供资金等问题上,英国没有达成共识。16世纪出现了大量的印刷文本,为英语读者提供了控制鼠疫传播的信息。最终,他们的作者将瘟疫解释为天意,许多人甚至声称瘟疫完全超出了人类行为的控制。本文将都铎王朝和斯图亚特·克朗斯不断演变的检疫政策与神职人员、医生、哲学家和诗人的声音进行对话,这些人参与了王室政策,有时还对其进行了大量批评。本文认为,国家强制实施检疫,激发了王室臣民对这种做法的表达和捍卫自己的观点,鼓励了大众政治对话的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quarantining Contagion: Providentialist Debates over Plague and Public Health in Elizabethan and Jacobean England
abstract:Despite repeated outbreaks of plague in the centuries following the Black Death, no consensus existed in England on the issues of how plague should be fought, how the infected should be cared for, and how the implementation of such measures would be funded. An abundance of printed texts emerged during the sixteenth century offering English readers information on what could and should be done to contain plague's spread. Ultimately their authors explained plague providentially, with many going so far as to claim that plague was entirely beyond the control of human actions. Placing the Tudor and Stuart Crowns' evolving quarantine policy into dialogue with the voices of clerics, physicians, philosophers, and poets who engaged with royal policy and at times offered substantial criticisms of it, this essay argues that the national imposition of quarantine provoked royal subjects to articulate and defend their own opinions about the practice, encouraging the development of popular political dialogue.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
HUNTINGTON LIBRARY QUARTERLY
HUNTINGTON LIBRARY QUARTERLY HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"That Dreadful Distemper": Smallpox, Quakers, and Inoculation in Enlightenment Britain The Annotations in the 1525 Ptolemy in the Huntington Library: The Continuing Influence of Martin Waldseemüller's World Map of 1507 Jonson's Imaginary Library: "An Execration upon Vulcan" and Its Intertexts Unwresting the Past: The Poetics and Politics of Samuel Daniel's 1595 Civil Wars A Tudor Family Library: Social Ambition and Continental Books in Sir Michael Dormer's Donation to the Bodleian Library
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1