数字技术视角下四国模式下的双边自由贸易协定

X. Henry Wang , Jingang Zhao
{"title":"数字技术视角下四国模式下的双边自由贸易协定","authors":"X. Henry Wang ,&nbsp;Jingang Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.jdec.2023.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Using a four-country North-South trade model with two identical countries in each region, this paper studies two types of bilateral free trade agreements: symmetric free trade agreements between countries in the same region, and asymmetric free trade agreements between countries from different regions. It first shows that a symmetric free trade agreement is always beneficial to its members and characterizes when it will increase or decrease the welfare of all countries. It then characterizes when an asymmetric free trade agreement is beneficial to its members and when it is beneficial to all countries.</p><p>Results of this paper provide a digital technology perspective for international trade agreements. In particular, they imply that countries with less advanced digital technologies in general have incentives to catch up to the more advanced countries and that in some instances it is also in the interest of the digitally more advanced countries to help the digitally less advanced countries shrink the technology gap.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100773,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Digital Economy","volume":"1 3","pages":"Pages 192-208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773067023000018/pdfft?md5=75ffa6072f3351244f741a45e1837cef&pid=1-s2.0-S2773067023000018-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bilateral free trade agreements in a four-country model with a digital technology perspective\",\"authors\":\"X. Henry Wang ,&nbsp;Jingang Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jdec.2023.01.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Using a four-country North-South trade model with two identical countries in each region, this paper studies two types of bilateral free trade agreements: symmetric free trade agreements between countries in the same region, and asymmetric free trade agreements between countries from different regions. It first shows that a symmetric free trade agreement is always beneficial to its members and characterizes when it will increase or decrease the welfare of all countries. It then characterizes when an asymmetric free trade agreement is beneficial to its members and when it is beneficial to all countries.</p><p>Results of this paper provide a digital technology perspective for international trade agreements. In particular, they imply that countries with less advanced digital technologies in general have incentives to catch up to the more advanced countries and that in some instances it is also in the interest of the digitally more advanced countries to help the digitally less advanced countries shrink the technology gap.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Digital Economy\",\"volume\":\"1 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 192-208\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773067023000018/pdfft?md5=75ffa6072f3351244f741a45e1837cef&pid=1-s2.0-S2773067023000018-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Digital Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773067023000018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Digital Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773067023000018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文采用每个地区有两个相同国家的四国南北贸易模型,研究了两种类型的双边自由贸易协定:同一地区国家之间的对称自由贸易协定和不同地区国家之间的不对称自由贸易协定。它首先表明一个对称的自由贸易协定总是对其成员有利,并描述了它何时会增加或减少所有国家的福利。然后,它描述了不对称自由贸易协定何时对其成员有利,何时对所有国家有利。本文的研究结果为国际贸易协定提供了一个数字技术视角。特别是,它们暗示数字技术不太先进的国家通常有动力追赶更先进的国家,在某些情况下,帮助数字技术不太先进的国家缩小技术差距也符合数字技术更先进的国家的利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bilateral free trade agreements in a four-country model with a digital technology perspective

Using a four-country North-South trade model with two identical countries in each region, this paper studies two types of bilateral free trade agreements: symmetric free trade agreements between countries in the same region, and asymmetric free trade agreements between countries from different regions. It first shows that a symmetric free trade agreement is always beneficial to its members and characterizes when it will increase or decrease the welfare of all countries. It then characterizes when an asymmetric free trade agreement is beneficial to its members and when it is beneficial to all countries.

Results of this paper provide a digital technology perspective for international trade agreements. In particular, they imply that countries with less advanced digital technologies in general have incentives to catch up to the more advanced countries and that in some instances it is also in the interest of the digitally more advanced countries to help the digitally less advanced countries shrink the technology gap.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Internet infrastructure, digital development and urban energy efficiency Information governance — A missing dimension in the varieties of capitalism framework illustrated using the case of information governance in China Impact of Musk's remarks on volatility of Bitcoin and Dogecoin amid COVID-19 pandemic Rural revitalization driven by digital infrastructure: Mechanisms and empirical verification Does digital economy promote regional green innovation? An empirical study based on the transmission effect and threshold effect of marketization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1