Chaid方法应用程序分析学生论文研究课题数学研究项目的倾向

Edumatika Pub Date : 2019-11-04 DOI:10.32939/EJRPM.V1I2.247
E. Hasibuan, Adek Nilasari Harahap
{"title":"Chaid方法应用程序分析学生论文研究课题数学研究项目的倾向","authors":"E. Hasibuan, Adek Nilasari Harahap","doi":"10.32939/EJRPM.V1I2.247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to identify, analyze and map the results of students’ research on mathematics education in 2015-2018. This research used the CHAID algorithm that consists of 3 steps ie merging, splitting and stopping steps. The results of this research were (1) In 2015-2018, 51,9% of the students’ research used the classroom action research and 48,1% else used the descriptive, the analysis and the experiment. (2) 14,1% of the students used media for teaching and learning and 3,7% of them did not. (3) 8,1% were individual research and 5,9% were a collaboration or team research. (4) While the level of school and subject taught in schools did not effect the trend of student research. \n ","PeriodicalId":34056,"journal":{"name":"Edumatika","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aplikasi Metode Chaid dalam Menganalisis Kecendrungan Penelitian Skripsi Mahasiswa pada Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika\",\"authors\":\"E. Hasibuan, Adek Nilasari Harahap\",\"doi\":\"10.32939/EJRPM.V1I2.247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to identify, analyze and map the results of students’ research on mathematics education in 2015-2018. This research used the CHAID algorithm that consists of 3 steps ie merging, splitting and stopping steps. The results of this research were (1) In 2015-2018, 51,9% of the students’ research used the classroom action research and 48,1% else used the descriptive, the analysis and the experiment. (2) 14,1% of the students used media for teaching and learning and 3,7% of them did not. (3) 8,1% were individual research and 5,9% were a collaboration or team research. (4) While the level of school and subject taught in schools did not effect the trend of student research. \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":34056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Edumatika\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Edumatika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32939/EJRPM.V1I2.247\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edumatika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32939/EJRPM.V1I2.247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本研究旨在识别、分析和绘制2015-2018年学生对数学教育的研究结果。本研究使用了CHAID算法,该算法分为合并、分割和停止三个步骤。本研究的结果是:(1)2015-2018年,51.9%的学生研究使用课堂行动研究,48.1%的学生研究使用描述、分析和实验。(2) 14.1%的学生使用媒体进行教学,3.7%的学生没有使用媒体。(3) 8.1%为个人研究,5.9%为合作或团队研究。(4)学校的办学水平和学科水平对学生的研究趋势没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Aplikasi Metode Chaid dalam Menganalisis Kecendrungan Penelitian Skripsi Mahasiswa pada Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika
This study aims to identify, analyze and map the results of students’ research on mathematics education in 2015-2018. This research used the CHAID algorithm that consists of 3 steps ie merging, splitting and stopping steps. The results of this research were (1) In 2015-2018, 51,9% of the students’ research used the classroom action research and 48,1% else used the descriptive, the analysis and the experiment. (2) 14,1% of the students used media for teaching and learning and 3,7% of them did not. (3) 8,1% were individual research and 5,9% were a collaboration or team research. (4) While the level of school and subject taught in schools did not effect the trend of student research.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving Skills in Solving HOTS Problems Effect of STEM Learning Method on Students’ Mathematical Concepts Understanding in Social Arithmetics Topic Mathematical Reasoning of the Quran Reciting Student by the Quran Recitation Ability Ethnomathematics Exploration: The Beads Basket Craft Context for Mathematics Learning Flipped Classroom Effect on Students’ Self-Regulated Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1