基于Simapro的外卖餐食包装(牛皮纸碗与塑料碗)生命周期评价比较

Fenjuan Shao, Qingbin Cui
{"title":"基于Simapro的外卖餐食包装(牛皮纸碗与塑料碗)生命周期评价比较","authors":"Fenjuan Shao, Qingbin Cui","doi":"10.1108/prt-10-2022-0113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to compare and analyze the impact of the commonly used takeout packing (Kraft paper bowl and plastic bowl) through life cycle assessment, then certain suggestions for the development of green packaging could be provided.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nIn this study, Simapro software was used to calculate and analyze the whole life cycle of takeout packaging from the stage of raw materials, production and processing and waste disposal.\n\n\nFindings\nTwelve environmental categories were used to quantitatively analyze the environmental impact of the two different bowls. The results showed that the impact of Kraft paper bowl on the environment was less than that of plastic bowl, regardless of raw material, processing or waste stage. Kraft paper bowl was better than plastic bowl.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis study compared and analyzed the progress of 750-mL bowls made with different materials and specific specifications.\n\n\nPractical implications\nGreen packaging is the development trend of the future packaging and follows the principle of reduce, resue, recycle, degradable. According to the calculation results, corresponding suggestions can be put forward from production, processing, use, waste and other aspects, and make corresponding contributions to the development of green packaging.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe contribution and impact of each stage of the product on the environment can be studied. The environmental impacts, such as global warming potential and water scarcity, can be reduced through different solutions, such as the use of green materials, good processing techniques and higher recycling rates.\n","PeriodicalId":20147,"journal":{"name":"Pigment & Resin Technology","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of life cycle assessment for takeout meal packaging (kraft paper bowl and plastic bowl) based on Simapro\",\"authors\":\"Fenjuan Shao, Qingbin Cui\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/prt-10-2022-0113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis study aims to compare and analyze the impact of the commonly used takeout packing (Kraft paper bowl and plastic bowl) through life cycle assessment, then certain suggestions for the development of green packaging could be provided.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nIn this study, Simapro software was used to calculate and analyze the whole life cycle of takeout packaging from the stage of raw materials, production and processing and waste disposal.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nTwelve environmental categories were used to quantitatively analyze the environmental impact of the two different bowls. The results showed that the impact of Kraft paper bowl on the environment was less than that of plastic bowl, regardless of raw material, processing or waste stage. Kraft paper bowl was better than plastic bowl.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThis study compared and analyzed the progress of 750-mL bowls made with different materials and specific specifications.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nGreen packaging is the development trend of the future packaging and follows the principle of reduce, resue, recycle, degradable. According to the calculation results, corresponding suggestions can be put forward from production, processing, use, waste and other aspects, and make corresponding contributions to the development of green packaging.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe contribution and impact of each stage of the product on the environment can be studied. The environmental impacts, such as global warming potential and water scarcity, can be reduced through different solutions, such as the use of green materials, good processing techniques and higher recycling rates.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":20147,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pigment & Resin Technology\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pigment & Resin Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/prt-10-2022-0113\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pigment & Resin Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/prt-10-2022-0113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在通过生命周期评价对常用的外卖包装(牛皮纸碗和塑料碗)的影响进行比较分析,为绿色包装的发展提供一定的建议。本研究采用Simapro软件对外卖包装从原材料、生产加工、废弃物处理阶段的全生命周期进行计算和分析。使用12个环境类别来定量分析两种不同碗的环境影响。结果表明,无论是原料、加工阶段还是废弃阶段,牛皮纸碗对环境的影响都小于塑料碗。牛皮纸碗比塑料碗好。研究局限性/意义本研究比较分析了不同材料和特定规格制作的750毫升碗的进展。绿色包装是未来包装的发展趋势,遵循减量化、再生、再循环、可降解的原则。根据计算结果,可以从生产、加工、使用、废弃等方面提出相应的建议,为绿色包装的发展做出相应的贡献。原创性/价值可以研究产品的每个阶段对环境的贡献和影响。环境影响,如全球变暖潜势和水资源短缺,可以通过不同的解决方案来减少,例如使用绿色材料、良好的加工技术和更高的回收率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of life cycle assessment for takeout meal packaging (kraft paper bowl and plastic bowl) based on Simapro
Purpose This study aims to compare and analyze the impact of the commonly used takeout packing (Kraft paper bowl and plastic bowl) through life cycle assessment, then certain suggestions for the development of green packaging could be provided. Design/methodology/approach In this study, Simapro software was used to calculate and analyze the whole life cycle of takeout packaging from the stage of raw materials, production and processing and waste disposal. Findings Twelve environmental categories were used to quantitatively analyze the environmental impact of the two different bowls. The results showed that the impact of Kraft paper bowl on the environment was less than that of plastic bowl, regardless of raw material, processing or waste stage. Kraft paper bowl was better than plastic bowl. Research limitations/implications This study compared and analyzed the progress of 750-mL bowls made with different materials and specific specifications. Practical implications Green packaging is the development trend of the future packaging and follows the principle of reduce, resue, recycle, degradable. According to the calculation results, corresponding suggestions can be put forward from production, processing, use, waste and other aspects, and make corresponding contributions to the development of green packaging. Originality/value The contribution and impact of each stage of the product on the environment can be studied. The environmental impacts, such as global warming potential and water scarcity, can be reduced through different solutions, such as the use of green materials, good processing techniques and higher recycling rates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
High performance coating formulation using multifunctional monomers and reinforcing functional fillers for protecting metal substrate Non-invasive measurement of spoilage of packed fish using halochromic sensor Phenoxazine-based fluorescence chemosensor for selective detection of cyanide Enhancing the functional properties and performance of paper via cellulose nanocrystals and funori loaded onto ZnO NPs Applicability of AgNPs/GO/Na2SiO3 nanocomposite as a charged nanosorbent in the removal of cationic and anionic model dyes from water
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1