贝叶斯预测方法在模型评估、选择和比较中的应用综述

IF 11 Q1 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY Statistics Surveys Pub Date : 2012-01-01 DOI:10.1214/12-SS102
Aki Vehtari, Janne Ojanen
{"title":"贝叶斯预测方法在模型评估、选择和比较中的应用综述","authors":"Aki Vehtari, Janne Ojanen","doi":"10.1214/12-SS102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To date, several methods exist in the statistical literature for model assessment, which purport themselves specifically as Bayesian predic- tive methods. The decision theoretic assumptions on which these methods are based are not always clearly stated in the original articles, however. The aim of this survey is to provide a unified review of Bayesian predictive model assessment and selection methods, and of methods closely related to them. We review the various assumptions that are made in this context and discuss the connections between different approaches, with an emphasis on how each method approximates the expected utility of using a Bayesian model for the purpose of predicting future data.","PeriodicalId":46627,"journal":{"name":"Statistics Surveys","volume":"4 1","pages":"142-228"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"318","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A survey of Bayesian predictive methods for model assessment, selection and comparison\",\"authors\":\"Aki Vehtari, Janne Ojanen\",\"doi\":\"10.1214/12-SS102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To date, several methods exist in the statistical literature for model assessment, which purport themselves specifically as Bayesian predic- tive methods. The decision theoretic assumptions on which these methods are based are not always clearly stated in the original articles, however. The aim of this survey is to provide a unified review of Bayesian predictive model assessment and selection methods, and of methods closely related to them. We review the various assumptions that are made in this context and discuss the connections between different approaches, with an emphasis on how each method approximates the expected utility of using a Bayesian model for the purpose of predicting future data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statistics Surveys\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"142-228\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"318\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statistics Surveys\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1214/12-SS102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics Surveys","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1214/12-SS102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 318

摘要

迄今为止,统计文献中存在几种用于模型评估的方法,它们声称自己具体为贝叶斯预测方法。然而,这些方法所基于的决策理论假设并不总是在原始文章中明确说明。本文的目的是对贝叶斯预测模型的评估和选择方法以及与之密切相关的方法进行综述。我们回顾了在这种情况下做出的各种假设,并讨论了不同方法之间的联系,重点是每种方法如何近似使用贝叶斯模型来预测未来数据的预期效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A survey of Bayesian predictive methods for model assessment, selection and comparison
To date, several methods exist in the statistical literature for model assessment, which purport themselves specifically as Bayesian predic- tive methods. The decision theoretic assumptions on which these methods are based are not always clearly stated in the original articles, however. The aim of this survey is to provide a unified review of Bayesian predictive model assessment and selection methods, and of methods closely related to them. We review the various assumptions that are made in this context and discuss the connections between different approaches, with an emphasis on how each method approximates the expected utility of using a Bayesian model for the purpose of predicting future data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Statistics Surveys
Statistics Surveys STATISTICS & PROBABILITY-
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: Statistics Surveys publishes survey articles in theoretical, computational, and applied statistics. The style of articles may range from reviews of recent research to graduate textbook exposition. Articles may be broad or narrow in scope. The essential requirements are a well specified topic and target audience, together with clear exposition. Statistics Surveys is sponsored by the American Statistical Association, the Bernoulli Society, the Institute of Mathematical Statistics, and by the Statistical Society of Canada.
期刊最新文献
White noise testing for functional time series Spline local basis methods for nonparametric density estimation Core-periphery structure in networks: A statistical exposition Kronecker-structured covariance models for multiway data A brief and understandable guide to pseudo-random number generators and specific models for security
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1