职业前芭蕾舞演员的神经肌肉训练:一项可行性随机对照试验

IF 1.1 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES Journal of Dance Medicine & Science Pub Date : 2022-06-15 DOI:10.12678/1089-313X.091522e
Nico Kolokythas, G. Metsios, S. Galloway, Nick Allen, Matthew A. Wyon
{"title":"职业前芭蕾舞演员的神经肌肉训练:一项可行性随机对照试验","authors":"Nico Kolokythas, G. Metsios, S. Galloway, Nick Allen, Matthew A. Wyon","doi":"10.12678/1089-313X.091522e","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction It is well documented that there is high prevalence of injuries in pre-professional and professional ballet dancers. Current evidence from high in quality and quantity research on injury prevention in sport indicates that interventions can reduce injury risks by 30% to 50%. Injury prevention research in dance is limited. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility (adherence, fidelity, and practicality) of a randomized controlled trial for the utilization of neuromuscular training in pre-professional ballet dancers. Methods A convenience sample of 22 pre-professional ballet dancers were randomized into an intervention and control group. The intervention group took part in a neuromuscular-based training workout, five times per week before the ballet class, for 10 weeks. The intervention was an adaptation of the FIFA 11+, an injury prevention intervention and is called 11+ Dance. The intervention consisted of low intensity bodyweight exercises that lasted 20 to 30 minutes performed daily. Results Intervention adherence was 38% ± 8%, with higher participation at the beginning of the study. Attendance for post-testing was low 45% and 36% for the intervention and control group, respectively, mainly due to injury. There were no adverse effects reported, however, the participants reported delayed onset muscle soreness at the beginning of the intervention, indicating that there may be a potential training effect. Fear of muscle hypertrophy and fatigue were also reported as reasons for attrition. The repeated measures ANOVA revealed statistically non-significant differences for the countermovement jump F(1, 9) = 0.36, p = 0.564, η2p = 0.04; reactive strength index F(1, 7) = 0.02, p = 0.885, η2p = 0.003; and the isometric mid-thigh pull F(1, 12) = 0.002, p = 0.967, η2p = 0.000. Conclusion The results of the study, together with the feedback from the participants, suggest that some protocol modifications are necessary for the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial in a pre-professional setting. The current trial has produced valuable information for the intervention fequency and load prescription.","PeriodicalId":46421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dance Medicine & Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuromuscular Training in Pre-Professional Ballet Dancers: A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial\",\"authors\":\"Nico Kolokythas, G. Metsios, S. Galloway, Nick Allen, Matthew A. Wyon\",\"doi\":\"10.12678/1089-313X.091522e\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction It is well documented that there is high prevalence of injuries in pre-professional and professional ballet dancers. Current evidence from high in quality and quantity research on injury prevention in sport indicates that interventions can reduce injury risks by 30% to 50%. Injury prevention research in dance is limited. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility (adherence, fidelity, and practicality) of a randomized controlled trial for the utilization of neuromuscular training in pre-professional ballet dancers. Methods A convenience sample of 22 pre-professional ballet dancers were randomized into an intervention and control group. The intervention group took part in a neuromuscular-based training workout, five times per week before the ballet class, for 10 weeks. The intervention was an adaptation of the FIFA 11+, an injury prevention intervention and is called 11+ Dance. The intervention consisted of low intensity bodyweight exercises that lasted 20 to 30 minutes performed daily. Results Intervention adherence was 38% ± 8%, with higher participation at the beginning of the study. Attendance for post-testing was low 45% and 36% for the intervention and control group, respectively, mainly due to injury. There were no adverse effects reported, however, the participants reported delayed onset muscle soreness at the beginning of the intervention, indicating that there may be a potential training effect. Fear of muscle hypertrophy and fatigue were also reported as reasons for attrition. The repeated measures ANOVA revealed statistically non-significant differences for the countermovement jump F(1, 9) = 0.36, p = 0.564, η2p = 0.04; reactive strength index F(1, 7) = 0.02, p = 0.885, η2p = 0.003; and the isometric mid-thigh pull F(1, 12) = 0.002, p = 0.967, η2p = 0.000. Conclusion The results of the study, together with the feedback from the participants, suggest that some protocol modifications are necessary for the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial in a pre-professional setting. The current trial has produced valuable information for the intervention fequency and load prescription.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dance Medicine & Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dance Medicine & Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12678/1089-313X.091522e\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dance Medicine & Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12678/1089-313X.091522e","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有充分的证据表明,在专业前和专业芭蕾舞演员中,受伤的发生率很高。目前来自高质量和高数量的运动损伤预防研究的证据表明,干预措施可以将损伤风险降低30%至50%。舞蹈损伤预防的研究是有限的。本研究的目的是评估一项随机对照试验在专业前芭蕾舞演员中应用神经肌肉训练的可行性(依从性、保真性和实用性)。方法将22名职业前芭蕾舞演员随机分为干预组和对照组。干预组在上芭蕾课前每周进行五次以神经肌肉为基础的训练,持续10周。干预是对国际足联11+的改编,这是一种伤害预防干预,被称为11+舞蹈。干预包括每天持续20至30分钟的低强度体重运动。结果干预依从性为38%±8%,研究开始时参与率较高。干预组和对照组的后测试出勤率分别为45%和36%,主要原因是损伤。没有不良反应的报道,然而,参与者在干预开始时报告延迟性肌肉酸痛,表明可能有潜在的训练效果。对肌肉肥大和疲劳的恐惧也被报道为消耗的原因。重复测量方差分析显示,反动作跳F(1,9) = 0.36, p = 0.564, η2p = 0.04,差异无统计学意义;反应强度指标F(1,7) = 0.02, p = 0.885, η2p = 0.003;等距大腿中部牵拉F(1,12) = 0.002, p = 0.967, η2p = 0.000。结论本研究的结果以及参与者的反馈表明,为了在专业前环境中进行随机对照试验的可行性,有必要对方案进行一些修改。目前的试验为干预频率和负荷处方提供了有价值的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Neuromuscular Training in Pre-Professional Ballet Dancers: A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial
Introduction It is well documented that there is high prevalence of injuries in pre-professional and professional ballet dancers. Current evidence from high in quality and quantity research on injury prevention in sport indicates that interventions can reduce injury risks by 30% to 50%. Injury prevention research in dance is limited. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility (adherence, fidelity, and practicality) of a randomized controlled trial for the utilization of neuromuscular training in pre-professional ballet dancers. Methods A convenience sample of 22 pre-professional ballet dancers were randomized into an intervention and control group. The intervention group took part in a neuromuscular-based training workout, five times per week before the ballet class, for 10 weeks. The intervention was an adaptation of the FIFA 11+, an injury prevention intervention and is called 11+ Dance. The intervention consisted of low intensity bodyweight exercises that lasted 20 to 30 minutes performed daily. Results Intervention adherence was 38% ± 8%, with higher participation at the beginning of the study. Attendance for post-testing was low 45% and 36% for the intervention and control group, respectively, mainly due to injury. There were no adverse effects reported, however, the participants reported delayed onset muscle soreness at the beginning of the intervention, indicating that there may be a potential training effect. Fear of muscle hypertrophy and fatigue were also reported as reasons for attrition. The repeated measures ANOVA revealed statistically non-significant differences for the countermovement jump F(1, 9) = 0.36, p = 0.564, η2p = 0.04; reactive strength index F(1, 7) = 0.02, p = 0.885, η2p = 0.003; and the isometric mid-thigh pull F(1, 12) = 0.002, p = 0.967, η2p = 0.000. Conclusion The results of the study, together with the feedback from the participants, suggest that some protocol modifications are necessary for the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial in a pre-professional setting. The current trial has produced valuable information for the intervention fequency and load prescription.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
Cueing Dancers to "Externally Rotate From the Hips" Improves Potentially Injurious Ankle Joint Angles and Contact Forces During a Demipointe Ballet Position. A 12-Week Ballroom Dance Training Improves Physical Fitness Performance More Than Walking Training in Older Women, Regardless of Vitamin B12 or D Adequacy. An Evaluation of the Sharing Dance Public School Program on Physical Literacy. "A Letter of Appreciation and Suggestions: Improving Methodological Rigor and Questionnaire Design in Ballet Dance Injury Research". Evaluation of the Physiological and Psychological Impact of Ballet Performances Across Age Cohorts: An Observational Uncontrolled Case Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1