x86、Power、ARM和c++中事务和弱内存的语义

Nathan Chong, Tyler Sorensen, John Wickerson
{"title":"x86、Power、ARM和c++中事务和弱内存的语义","authors":"Nathan Chong, Tyler Sorensen, John Wickerson","doi":"10.1145/3192366.3192373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Weak memory models provide a complex, system-centric semantics for concurrent programs, while transactional memory (TM) provides a simpler, programmer-centric semantics. Both have been studied in detail, but their combined semantics is not well understood. This is problematic because such widely-used architectures and languages as x86, Power, and C++ all support TM, and all have weak memory models. Our work aims to clarify the interplay between weak memory and TM by extending existing axiomatic weak memory models (x86, Power, ARMv8, and C++) with new rules for TM. Our formal models are backed by automated tooling that enables (1) the synthesis of tests for validating our models against existing implementations and (2) the model-checking of TM-related transformations, such as lock elision and compiling C++ transactions to hardware. A key finding is that a proposed TM extension to ARMv8 currently being considered within ARM Research is incompatible with lock elision without sacrificing portability or performance.","PeriodicalId":20583,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 39th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The semantics of transactions and weak memory in x86, Power, ARM, and C++\",\"authors\":\"Nathan Chong, Tyler Sorensen, John Wickerson\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3192366.3192373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Weak memory models provide a complex, system-centric semantics for concurrent programs, while transactional memory (TM) provides a simpler, programmer-centric semantics. Both have been studied in detail, but their combined semantics is not well understood. This is problematic because such widely-used architectures and languages as x86, Power, and C++ all support TM, and all have weak memory models. Our work aims to clarify the interplay between weak memory and TM by extending existing axiomatic weak memory models (x86, Power, ARMv8, and C++) with new rules for TM. Our formal models are backed by automated tooling that enables (1) the synthesis of tests for validating our models against existing implementations and (2) the model-checking of TM-related transformations, such as lock elision and compiling C++ transactions to hardware. A key finding is that a proposed TM extension to ARMv8 currently being considered within ARM Research is incompatible with lock elision without sacrificing portability or performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 39th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 39th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3192366.3192373\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 39th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3192366.3192373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

摘要

弱内存模型为并发程序提供了复杂的、以系统为中心的语义,而事务内存(TM)提供了更简单的、以程序员为中心的语义。两者都被详细研究过,但是它们的综合语义还没有被很好地理解。这是有问题的,因为诸如x86、Power和c++等广泛使用的体系结构和语言都支持TM,并且都具有较弱的内存模型。我们的工作旨在通过用新的TM规则扩展现有的公理弱内存模型(x86、Power、ARMv8和c++)来阐明弱内存和TM之间的相互作用。我们的正式模型由自动化工具支持,它支持(1)针对现有实现验证我们的模型的综合测试,以及(2)tm相关转换的模型检查,例如锁省略和编译c++事务到硬件。一个重要的发现是,ARM研究院目前正在考虑的ARMv8的TM扩展与锁省略不兼容,但不会牺牲可移植性或性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The semantics of transactions and weak memory in x86, Power, ARM, and C++
Weak memory models provide a complex, system-centric semantics for concurrent programs, while transactional memory (TM) provides a simpler, programmer-centric semantics. Both have been studied in detail, but their combined semantics is not well understood. This is problematic because such widely-used architectures and languages as x86, Power, and C++ all support TM, and all have weak memory models. Our work aims to clarify the interplay between weak memory and TM by extending existing axiomatic weak memory models (x86, Power, ARMv8, and C++) with new rules for TM. Our formal models are backed by automated tooling that enables (1) the synthesis of tests for validating our models against existing implementations and (2) the model-checking of TM-related transformations, such as lock elision and compiling C++ transactions to hardware. A key finding is that a proposed TM extension to ARMv8 currently being considered within ARM Research is incompatible with lock elision without sacrificing portability or performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Partial control-flow linearization Proceedings of the 39th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation Bayonet: probabilistic inference for networks Advanced automata-based algorithms for program termination checking Guarded impredicative polymorphism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1