设计评审:专家更好吗?放慢速度能提高性能吗?

C. MacRobert
{"title":"设计评审:专家更好吗?放慢速度能提高性能吗?","authors":"C. MacRobert","doi":"10.1680/jfoen.22.00013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Design review is an important aspect of engineering design. Designs certified by a professional engineer require some form of external check. This external check can range from a quick intuitive assessment of a proposed solution to a reassessment of the problem using alternative methods. This research explored intuitive review assessments for two typical geotechnical designs. Results suggest that those with requisite experience (even seemingly little experience) can make correct assessments even after spending as few as 4 minutes reviewing a carefully presented solution. Forcing participants to state reasons for a decision (and thereby slowing them down) only served to improve predictions by novices attempting an unfamiliar problem. While such quick intuitive reviews appeared adequate for assessing the problems presented here, some experts still made erroneous decisions even after stating reasons for a decision. Design reviews are an important step in design and should never be taken lightly.","PeriodicalId":42902,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Forensic Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design reviewing: are experts better and does slowing down improve performance?\",\"authors\":\"C. MacRobert\",\"doi\":\"10.1680/jfoen.22.00013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Design review is an important aspect of engineering design. Designs certified by a professional engineer require some form of external check. This external check can range from a quick intuitive assessment of a proposed solution to a reassessment of the problem using alternative methods. This research explored intuitive review assessments for two typical geotechnical designs. Results suggest that those with requisite experience (even seemingly little experience) can make correct assessments even after spending as few as 4 minutes reviewing a carefully presented solution. Forcing participants to state reasons for a decision (and thereby slowing them down) only served to improve predictions by novices attempting an unfamiliar problem. While such quick intuitive reviews appeared adequate for assessing the problems presented here, some experts still made erroneous decisions even after stating reasons for a decision. Design reviews are an important step in design and should never be taken lightly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Forensic Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Forensic Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1680/jfoen.22.00013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Forensic Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jfoen.22.00013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

设计评审是工程设计的一个重要方面。由专业工程师认证的设计需要某种形式的外部检查。这种外部检查的范围可以从对提议的解决方案的快速直观评估到使用替代方法对问题进行重新评估。本研究探讨了两种典型岩土设计的直观评审评价方法。结果表明,那些有必要经验的人(即使看似没有经验)甚至可以在花费短短4分钟的时间仔细审查一个精心提出的解决方案后做出正确的评估。强迫参与者陈述决定的原因(从而放慢他们的速度)只会提高尝试解决不熟悉问题的新手的预测能力。虽然这种快速直观的审查似乎足以评估这里提出的问题,但一些专家即使在陈述了决定的原因后仍然做出了错误的决定。设计评审是设计的重要步骤,绝不能掉以轻心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Design reviewing: are experts better and does slowing down improve performance?
Design review is an important aspect of engineering design. Designs certified by a professional engineer require some form of external check. This external check can range from a quick intuitive assessment of a proposed solution to a reassessment of the problem using alternative methods. This research explored intuitive review assessments for two typical geotechnical designs. Results suggest that those with requisite experience (even seemingly little experience) can make correct assessments even after spending as few as 4 minutes reviewing a carefully presented solution. Forcing participants to state reasons for a decision (and thereby slowing them down) only served to improve predictions by novices attempting an unfamiliar problem. While such quick intuitive reviews appeared adequate for assessing the problems presented here, some experts still made erroneous decisions even after stating reasons for a decision. Design reviews are an important step in design and should never be taken lightly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Using wearable technologies to minimise occupational illnesses among construction workers Driven pile foundation reuse in East London Managing piling obstruction risk intelligently for reinvention of a brutalist building Confidence and performance in different engineering tasks Strip footings for the extension of a piled building
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1