论国际脱钩的原因及其影响

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Intereconomics Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.2478/ie-2023-0019
Florian W. Bartholomae, C. Nam
{"title":"论国际脱钩的原因及其影响","authors":"Florian W. Bartholomae, C. Nam","doi":"10.2478/ie-2023-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the current economic policy debate, there are often calls to reverse advanced developments in globalisation and the international division of labour. Reasons such as greater business resilience, political independence and, from a climate perspective, less harmful production argue for not abolishing trade, but at least bundling a larger part of the value chain locally. However, such considerations are de facto made from the perspective of a highly developed and globally networked industrialised country. In contrast, this paper argues that trade activities can never be considered from the perspective of only one partner, but must always take into account the needs of all stakeholders, which in turn depend on the respective level of development.","PeriodicalId":35662,"journal":{"name":"Intereconomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Critical Discussion on the Reasons and Impacts of International Decoupling\",\"authors\":\"Florian W. Bartholomae, C. Nam\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/ie-2023-0019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In the current economic policy debate, there are often calls to reverse advanced developments in globalisation and the international division of labour. Reasons such as greater business resilience, political independence and, from a climate perspective, less harmful production argue for not abolishing trade, but at least bundling a larger part of the value chain locally. However, such considerations are de facto made from the perspective of a highly developed and globally networked industrialised country. In contrast, this paper argues that trade activities can never be considered from the perspective of only one partner, but must always take into account the needs of all stakeholders, which in turn depend on the respective level of development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intereconomics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intereconomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/ie-2023-0019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intereconomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ie-2023-0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在当前的经济政策辩论中,经常有人呼吁逆转全球化和国际分工的先进发展。更强的商业弹性、更大的政治独立性,以及从气候角度来看,更少有害的生产,这些理由都表明,不应该废除贸易,而至少应该将价值链的更大部分捆绑在当地。然而,这些考虑实际上是从一个高度发达和全球网络化的工业化国家的角度出发的。相比之下,本文认为贸易活动永远不能只从一个合作伙伴的角度来考虑,而必须始终考虑到所有利益相关者的需求,而这些利益相关者的需求又取决于各自的发展水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Critical Discussion on the Reasons and Impacts of International Decoupling
Abstract In the current economic policy debate, there are often calls to reverse advanced developments in globalisation and the international division of labour. Reasons such as greater business resilience, political independence and, from a climate perspective, less harmful production argue for not abolishing trade, but at least bundling a larger part of the value chain locally. However, such considerations are de facto made from the perspective of a highly developed and globally networked industrialised country. In contrast, this paper argues that trade activities can never be considered from the perspective of only one partner, but must always take into account the needs of all stakeholders, which in turn depend on the respective level of development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Intereconomics
Intereconomics Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Intereconomics publishes papers dealing with economic and social policy issues in Europe respectively in Euroland. The journal consists of the sections editorial, forum and articles. The editorial section contains brief comments on current questions of economic policy in Europe or effecting Europe. In the forum, several authors (researchers, politicians, representatives of trade unions and of employers associations etc.) voice their opinions on one particular current economic policy problem effecting Europe. The articles deal with economic policy issues and trends in Europe. They are mostly written by researchers in economics. Officially cited as: Intereconomics
期刊最新文献
The EU’s Digital Markets Act: Regulatory Reform, Relapse or Reversal? Tomorrow at Work: The Age of Shortages Letter from America: Biden’s International Trade Policy: Déjà Vu, Again Forum Introduction: From Unemployment Struggles to Labour Market Shortages? Structural and Cyclical Risks in Housing Markets in OECD Countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1