二十世纪三个语言学概念的简要论述,没有矛盾

Irina Priorova
{"title":"二十世纪三个语言学概念的简要论述,没有矛盾","authors":"Irina Priorova","doi":"10.24234/scientific.v1i44.49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the consistency and aesthetics of language in comparison of the views of three outstanding linguists of the 20th century. Their judgments about the continuity of linguistic transformation are distinguished by originality. Despite the fundamentally different approaches of K. Fossler, E. Coceriu and R.A. Budagov in comprehending the aesthetic function of language, their views are united by the norm of the language․ Comparison of three independent linguistic positions is built as a kind of discussion without contradictions on the analysis of the system and norm, the aesthetics of language and linguistic form. Forecasts on these issues are updated especially hard during periods of a serious reboot of the communicative space. Changing the regulatory framework is an inevitable process of any national language and is clearly visible at the functional level. Therefore, the mechanisms for changing the norm do not depend on the recognition or non-recognition of the systemic nature of the language and its levels, but strictly correlate with the aesthetic function. The aesthetic function of language itself is of interest to linguists especially when tectonic shifts of the standard positions of the norm occur in the changing times.","PeriodicalId":36159,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Bulletin of Naval Academy","volume":"88 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DISCUSSION WITHOUT CONTRADICTIONS IN BRIEF STATEMENT OF THREE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTS OF THE XX CENTURY\",\"authors\":\"Irina Priorova\",\"doi\":\"10.24234/scientific.v1i44.49\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article discusses the consistency and aesthetics of language in comparison of the views of three outstanding linguists of the 20th century. Their judgments about the continuity of linguistic transformation are distinguished by originality. Despite the fundamentally different approaches of K. Fossler, E. Coceriu and R.A. Budagov in comprehending the aesthetic function of language, their views are united by the norm of the language․ Comparison of three independent linguistic positions is built as a kind of discussion without contradictions on the analysis of the system and norm, the aesthetics of language and linguistic form. Forecasts on these issues are updated especially hard during periods of a serious reboot of the communicative space. Changing the regulatory framework is an inevitable process of any national language and is clearly visible at the functional level. Therefore, the mechanisms for changing the norm do not depend on the recognition or non-recognition of the systemic nature of the language and its levels, but strictly correlate with the aesthetic function. The aesthetic function of language itself is of interest to linguists especially when tectonic shifts of the standard positions of the norm occur in the changing times.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Bulletin of Naval Academy\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Bulletin of Naval Academy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24234/scientific.v1i44.49\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Bulletin of Naval Academy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24234/scientific.v1i44.49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过对20世纪三位杰出语言学家观点的比较,探讨了语言的一致性和美学问题。他们对语言转换连续性的判断具有独创性。福斯勒、柯塞儒和布达戈夫虽然在理解语言的审美功能方面有着根本不同的方法,但他们的观点是由语言的规范统一起来的,三种独立的语言立场的比较是建立在对系统和规范、语言美学和语言形式的分析上的一种没有矛盾的讨论。在交流空间严重重启期间,对这些问题的预测尤其难以更新。改变监管框架是任何一种民族语言不可避免的过程,在功能层面上是清晰可见的。因此,规范改变的机制并不取决于对语言的系统性质及其层次的承认或不承认,而是与审美功能严格相关。语言本身的审美功能是语言学家感兴趣的,特别是当规范的标准位置在不断变化的时代发生结构性变化时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DISCUSSION WITHOUT CONTRADICTIONS IN BRIEF STATEMENT OF THREE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTS OF THE XX CENTURY
The article discusses the consistency and aesthetics of language in comparison of the views of three outstanding linguists of the 20th century. Their judgments about the continuity of linguistic transformation are distinguished by originality. Despite the fundamentally different approaches of K. Fossler, E. Coceriu and R.A. Budagov in comprehending the aesthetic function of language, their views are united by the norm of the language․ Comparison of three independent linguistic positions is built as a kind of discussion without contradictions on the analysis of the system and norm, the aesthetics of language and linguistic form. Forecasts on these issues are updated especially hard during periods of a serious reboot of the communicative space. Changing the regulatory framework is an inevitable process of any national language and is clearly visible at the functional level. Therefore, the mechanisms for changing the norm do not depend on the recognition or non-recognition of the systemic nature of the language and its levels, but strictly correlate with the aesthetic function. The aesthetic function of language itself is of interest to linguists especially when tectonic shifts of the standard positions of the norm occur in the changing times.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Bulletin of Naval Academy
Scientific Bulletin of Naval Academy Engineering-Ocean Engineering
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
RESOLVING PARADOXES OF PHYSICS IN THE UNIVERSITY STUDY SOME THEORETICAL AND APPLIED PROBLEMS OF VERBS WITH BORROWINGS OF ARABIC ORIGIN EFFECTIVENESS OF ONLINE EDUCATION OF FUTURE DOCTORS IN THE PROCESS OF TEACHING PHYSIOLOGY FREE VIBRATIONS OF THIN ELASTIC ORTHOTROPIC CYLINDRICAL PANEL WITH RIGID – CLAMPED EDGE GENERATOR THE PROBLEM OF CLASSIFICATION OF STYLES IN THE ARMENIAN STYLIST STUDIES (FROM THE 1950S TO THE PRESENT DAY)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1