两种口服Perampanel制剂在健康受试者中的比较生物利用度:一项随机、开放标签、单剂量、双向交叉研究

Yerino Ga, Feleder Ec, Otero Am, D. L, Sakson M, Mondelo N, Roldán Eja
{"title":"两种口服Perampanel制剂在健康受试者中的比较生物利用度:一项随机、开放标签、单剂量、双向交叉研究","authors":"Yerino Ga, Feleder Ec, Otero Am, D. L, Sakson M, Mondelo N, Roldán Eja","doi":"10.4172/JBB.1000353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Perampanel is a glutamate non-competitive receptor antagonist that is effective as adjunctive treatment for epilepsy. No studies regarding comparative bioavailability between a generic perampanel formulation and the brand-name product have been published in the literature. Therefore, the goal of the present investigation was to compare the bioavailability and to evaluate the bioequivalence between a novel pharmaceutical equivalent 12 mg film-coated tablet formulation and the reference product. \n \nMethods: An open label, randomized-sequence, two-period, two-treatment, single-dose, crossover design study in healthy volunteers(n=24) was conducted. The treatment was split out by a 42 days wash-out period. The informed consent was signed by all volunteers. Healthy subjects of both genders, including non-pregnant and nonlactating females between 21-55 years with Quetelet index between 19-29 kg/m2 were enrolled. Blood samples were withdrawn in vacutainers with EDTA over 168 h and plasma levels of perampanel were measured by HPLC/ fluorescence method. Pharmacokinetic (PK) variables (Cmax, AUC0-last, and AUCinf) after a single oral administration dose of the test and reference treatments were analyzed by a non-compartmental PK model using natural logtransformed data and were compared by ANOVA for a two-treatment crossover design. Bioequivalence between the two formulations was evaluated using the 90% Confidence Interval (CI) comprised between 80-125% corresponding to the ratio of the geometric means for log-transformed PK parameters. \n \nResults: A similar bioavailability between products was determined. Test and reference formulations showed no statistically significant differences in relation to the fixed effect of period, sequence, treatment and volunteers within sequence as random effect for PK variables. The estimated point and 90% CI of the ratios of Cmax, AUC0-last and AUCinf were 0.92 (0.83-1.03), 1.04(0.98-1.10) and 0.98 (0.86-1.11), respectively. The formulations showed comparable safety and tolerability. \n \nConclusion: The new pharmaceutical equivalent perampanel 12 mg film-coated tablet formulation was also bioequivalent to the reference product. Therefore, both drugs are interchangeable.","PeriodicalId":15184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bioequivalence & Bioavailability","volume":"41 1","pages":"501-508"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Bioavailability of Two Oral Perampanel Formulations in Healthy Subjects: A Randomized, Open Label, Single-Dose, 2-Way Crossover Study\",\"authors\":\"Yerino Ga, Feleder Ec, Otero Am, D. L, Sakson M, Mondelo N, Roldán Eja\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/JBB.1000353\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Perampanel is a glutamate non-competitive receptor antagonist that is effective as adjunctive treatment for epilepsy. No studies regarding comparative bioavailability between a generic perampanel formulation and the brand-name product have been published in the literature. Therefore, the goal of the present investigation was to compare the bioavailability and to evaluate the bioequivalence between a novel pharmaceutical equivalent 12 mg film-coated tablet formulation and the reference product. \\n \\nMethods: An open label, randomized-sequence, two-period, two-treatment, single-dose, crossover design study in healthy volunteers(n=24) was conducted. The treatment was split out by a 42 days wash-out period. The informed consent was signed by all volunteers. Healthy subjects of both genders, including non-pregnant and nonlactating females between 21-55 years with Quetelet index between 19-29 kg/m2 were enrolled. Blood samples were withdrawn in vacutainers with EDTA over 168 h and plasma levels of perampanel were measured by HPLC/ fluorescence method. Pharmacokinetic (PK) variables (Cmax, AUC0-last, and AUCinf) after a single oral administration dose of the test and reference treatments were analyzed by a non-compartmental PK model using natural logtransformed data and were compared by ANOVA for a two-treatment crossover design. Bioequivalence between the two formulations was evaluated using the 90% Confidence Interval (CI) comprised between 80-125% corresponding to the ratio of the geometric means for log-transformed PK parameters. \\n \\nResults: A similar bioavailability between products was determined. Test and reference formulations showed no statistically significant differences in relation to the fixed effect of period, sequence, treatment and volunteers within sequence as random effect for PK variables. The estimated point and 90% CI of the ratios of Cmax, AUC0-last and AUCinf were 0.92 (0.83-1.03), 1.04(0.98-1.10) and 0.98 (0.86-1.11), respectively. The formulations showed comparable safety and tolerability. \\n \\nConclusion: The new pharmaceutical equivalent perampanel 12 mg film-coated tablet formulation was also bioequivalent to the reference product. Therefore, both drugs are interchangeable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bioequivalence & Bioavailability\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"501-508\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bioequivalence & Bioavailability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/JBB.1000353\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bioequivalence & Bioavailability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/JBB.1000353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:Perampanel是一种谷氨酸非竞争性受体拮抗剂,作为癫痫的辅助治疗有效。文献中没有关于通用perampanel配方和品牌产品之间比较生物利用度的研究。因此,本研究的目的是比较生物利用度,并评估一个新的药物等效的12毫克薄膜包衣片制剂与参比产品的生物等效性。方法:采用开放标签、随机序列、两期、两治疗、单剂量、交叉设计的健康志愿者研究(n=24)。治疗分为42天的洗脱期。所有志愿者都签署了知情同意书。研究对象为21-55岁、未怀孕和未哺乳期女性,年龄在19-29 kg/m2之间。用EDTA抽血168 h,用高效液相色谱/荧光法测定血浆中perampanel的水平。采用自然对数转换数据,采用非室区PK模型分析单次口服给药剂量后的药代动力学(PK)变量(Cmax、AUC0-last和AUCinf),并采用双处理交叉设计的方差分析进行比较。采用80-125%的90%置信区间(CI)评估两种制剂的生物等效性,该区间对应于对数变换PK参数的几何平均值的比值。结果:两种产品的生物利用度相近。试验配方与参考配方在PK变量随机效应方面,周期、序列、治疗和序列内志愿者的固定效应均无统计学差异。Cmax、AUC0-last和AUCinf比值的估计点和90% CI分别为0.92(0.83-1.03)、1.04(0.98-1.10)和0.98(0.86-1.11)。这些制剂显示出相当的安全性和耐受性。结论:新药等效perampanel 12 mg薄膜包衣片制剂与参比品具有生物等效性。因此,这两种药物是可以互换的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Bioavailability of Two Oral Perampanel Formulations in Healthy Subjects: A Randomized, Open Label, Single-Dose, 2-Way Crossover Study
Background: Perampanel is a glutamate non-competitive receptor antagonist that is effective as adjunctive treatment for epilepsy. No studies regarding comparative bioavailability between a generic perampanel formulation and the brand-name product have been published in the literature. Therefore, the goal of the present investigation was to compare the bioavailability and to evaluate the bioequivalence between a novel pharmaceutical equivalent 12 mg film-coated tablet formulation and the reference product. Methods: An open label, randomized-sequence, two-period, two-treatment, single-dose, crossover design study in healthy volunteers(n=24) was conducted. The treatment was split out by a 42 days wash-out period. The informed consent was signed by all volunteers. Healthy subjects of both genders, including non-pregnant and nonlactating females between 21-55 years with Quetelet index between 19-29 kg/m2 were enrolled. Blood samples were withdrawn in vacutainers with EDTA over 168 h and plasma levels of perampanel were measured by HPLC/ fluorescence method. Pharmacokinetic (PK) variables (Cmax, AUC0-last, and AUCinf) after a single oral administration dose of the test and reference treatments were analyzed by a non-compartmental PK model using natural logtransformed data and were compared by ANOVA for a two-treatment crossover design. Bioequivalence between the two formulations was evaluated using the 90% Confidence Interval (CI) comprised between 80-125% corresponding to the ratio of the geometric means for log-transformed PK parameters. Results: A similar bioavailability between products was determined. Test and reference formulations showed no statistically significant differences in relation to the fixed effect of period, sequence, treatment and volunteers within sequence as random effect for PK variables. The estimated point and 90% CI of the ratios of Cmax, AUC0-last and AUCinf were 0.92 (0.83-1.03), 1.04(0.98-1.10) and 0.98 (0.86-1.11), respectively. The formulations showed comparable safety and tolerability. Conclusion: The new pharmaceutical equivalent perampanel 12 mg film-coated tablet formulation was also bioequivalent to the reference product. Therefore, both drugs are interchangeable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Future Outlook for Biosafety and Biotechnology Effect of Fatty Acids on Bioavailability Clinical Trials of COVID-19 in China Anticipation of Castor Industry and Bottle Scruff Deviation Range to Address Genuine Bioavailability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1