气体燃料排放的比较评估

O. Levytska, Y. V. Voytenko, Anastasiia Oleksiivna Orishechok
{"title":"气体燃料排放的比较评估","authors":"O. Levytska, Y. V. Voytenko, Anastasiia Oleksiivna Orishechok","doi":"10.20998/2079-0821.2021.01.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The work presents estimated comparative assessment of emissions release in combustion products during work of high–power steam boilers with the use of traditional fuel – natural gas and alternative fuels – blast–furnace and coke–oven gases generated in the process of technological cycle at iron and steel and coke–chemical enterprises. Calculation algorithm is shown and formulas for assessment of carbon content in exhaust gases are defined, conclusions on ecological efficiency of gaseous fuels are given. \nThe purpose of the work was to evaluate the emissions of harmful substances generated during the combustion of natural, blast furnace and coke oven gases, justification of the calculation of carbon content of a given chemical composition and determine the optimal environmental impact of analogues of natural gas. \nThe comparative estimation of pollutant emissions into atmospheric air during combustion of natural, coke oven and blast furnace gases revealed: \n– high sulfur dioxide emissions from combustion of blast furnace and coke oven gases due to the presence of sulfur compounds in the composition of these gases; \n– relatively high emissions of nitrogen compounds for natural and coke oven gases and relatively low emissions for blast furnace gas; \n– сarbon emissions are high for all types of fuels which have been considered, most carbon dioxide gets into  the air when burning natural gas, least – when burning blast furnace gas; \n– significantly higher methane emissions are observed during the combustion of natural and coke oven gases, respectively, smaller – for blast–furnace gas combustion; \n– coke oven and natural gases are characterized by low mercury emissions. \nComparative assessment of the calculated values of hazardous substances emissions in the combustion products in the process of combustion of natural, coke–oven and blast–furnace gases shows that even at lower working heat of combustion values the coke–oven and blast–furnace gases can compete with natural gas. \nFor the first time, a comparative characterization of the emissions of harmful substances in the combustion of natural, coke oven and blast furnace gases is presented, and it is shown that the gases used in coke and metallurgical industries, which are used as analogues of natural, are logical to use, but require the installation of treatment systems. The paper defines a formula for calculating the carbon content in natural gas from the Urengoy–Uzhhorod gas pipeline. The provided calculations and the introduction of simplified formulas serve as an example for the calculation of emission factors and emissions in assessing the level of safety of existing equipment and can be used in the development of permit documents of enterprises that carry out emissions of harmful substances to the environment.","PeriodicalId":9407,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the National Technical University \"KhPI\". Series: Chemistry, Chemical Technology and Ecology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF GASEOUS FUEL EMISSION\",\"authors\":\"O. Levytska, Y. V. Voytenko, Anastasiia Oleksiivna Orishechok\",\"doi\":\"10.20998/2079-0821.2021.01.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The work presents estimated comparative assessment of emissions release in combustion products during work of high–power steam boilers with the use of traditional fuel – natural gas and alternative fuels – blast–furnace and coke–oven gases generated in the process of technological cycle at iron and steel and coke–chemical enterprises. Calculation algorithm is shown and formulas for assessment of carbon content in exhaust gases are defined, conclusions on ecological efficiency of gaseous fuels are given. \\nThe purpose of the work was to evaluate the emissions of harmful substances generated during the combustion of natural, blast furnace and coke oven gases, justification of the calculation of carbon content of a given chemical composition and determine the optimal environmental impact of analogues of natural gas. \\nThe comparative estimation of pollutant emissions into atmospheric air during combustion of natural, coke oven and blast furnace gases revealed: \\n– high sulfur dioxide emissions from combustion of blast furnace and coke oven gases due to the presence of sulfur compounds in the composition of these gases; \\n– relatively high emissions of nitrogen compounds for natural and coke oven gases and relatively low emissions for blast furnace gas; \\n– сarbon emissions are high for all types of fuels which have been considered, most carbon dioxide gets into  the air when burning natural gas, least – when burning blast furnace gas; \\n– significantly higher methane emissions are observed during the combustion of natural and coke oven gases, respectively, smaller – for blast–furnace gas combustion; \\n– coke oven and natural gases are characterized by low mercury emissions. \\nComparative assessment of the calculated values of hazardous substances emissions in the combustion products in the process of combustion of natural, coke–oven and blast–furnace gases shows that even at lower working heat of combustion values the coke–oven and blast–furnace gases can compete with natural gas. \\nFor the first time, a comparative characterization of the emissions of harmful substances in the combustion of natural, coke oven and blast furnace gases is presented, and it is shown that the gases used in coke and metallurgical industries, which are used as analogues of natural, are logical to use, but require the installation of treatment systems. The paper defines a formula for calculating the carbon content in natural gas from the Urengoy–Uzhhorod gas pipeline. The provided calculations and the introduction of simplified formulas serve as an example for the calculation of emission factors and emissions in assessing the level of safety of existing equipment and can be used in the development of permit documents of enterprises that carry out emissions of harmful substances to the environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the National Technical University \\\"KhPI\\\". Series: Chemistry, Chemical Technology and Ecology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the National Technical University \\\"KhPI\\\". Series: Chemistry, Chemical Technology and Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20998/2079-0821.2021.01.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the National Technical University \"KhPI\". Series: Chemistry, Chemical Technology and Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20998/2079-0821.2021.01.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对钢铁和焦化企业大功率蒸汽锅炉与使用传统燃料天然气和替代燃料高炉煤气和焦炉煤气在工艺循环过程中产生的燃烧产物排放进行了估计比较评价。给出了计算算法,定义了废气碳含量的计算公式,给出了气体燃料生态效率的结论。这项工作的目的是评估天然、高炉和焦炉气体燃烧过程中产生的有害物质排放,证明计算特定化学成分碳含量的合理性,并确定天然气类似物对环境的最佳影响。对天然煤气、焦炉煤气和鼓风炉煤气燃烧时排放到大气中的污染物的比较估计表明:-由于鼓风炉煤气和焦炉煤气的成分中含有硫化合物,燃烧时产生的二氧化硫排放量很高;-天然煤气和焦炉煤气的氮化合物排放量相对较高,高炉煤气的排放量相对较低;-所有类型的燃料的碳排放量都很高,燃烧天然气时大多数二氧化碳进入空气,燃烧高炉煤气时最少;-在燃烧天然气体和焦炉气体时,甲烷排放量分别显著增加,而在燃烧高炉气体时,甲烷排放量则较小;-焦炉和天然气的特点是汞排放量低。通过对天然煤气、焦炉煤气和高炉煤气燃烧过程中燃烧产物中有害物质排放计算值的对比评价表明,即使在较低的燃烧工热值下,焦炉煤气和高炉煤气也可以与天然气相媲美。本文首次对天然煤气、焦炉煤气和鼓风炉煤气燃烧中有害物质的排放进行了比较,结果表明,焦炭和冶金工业中使用的煤气作为天然煤气的类似物,使用起来是合乎逻辑的,但需要安装处理系统。本文定义了一个计算乌连戈伊-乌日霍罗德输气管道天然气含碳量的公式。所提供的计算方法和所采用的简化公式可作为评估现有设备安全水平时计算排放系数和排放量的范例,并可用于编制向环境排放有害物质的企业的许可证文件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF GASEOUS FUEL EMISSION
The work presents estimated comparative assessment of emissions release in combustion products during work of high–power steam boilers with the use of traditional fuel – natural gas and alternative fuels – blast–furnace and coke–oven gases generated in the process of technological cycle at iron and steel and coke–chemical enterprises. Calculation algorithm is shown and formulas for assessment of carbon content in exhaust gases are defined, conclusions on ecological efficiency of gaseous fuels are given. The purpose of the work was to evaluate the emissions of harmful substances generated during the combustion of natural, blast furnace and coke oven gases, justification of the calculation of carbon content of a given chemical composition and determine the optimal environmental impact of analogues of natural gas. The comparative estimation of pollutant emissions into atmospheric air during combustion of natural, coke oven and blast furnace gases revealed: – high sulfur dioxide emissions from combustion of blast furnace and coke oven gases due to the presence of sulfur compounds in the composition of these gases; – relatively high emissions of nitrogen compounds for natural and coke oven gases and relatively low emissions for blast furnace gas; – сarbon emissions are high for all types of fuels which have been considered, most carbon dioxide gets into  the air when burning natural gas, least – when burning blast furnace gas; – significantly higher methane emissions are observed during the combustion of natural and coke oven gases, respectively, smaller – for blast–furnace gas combustion; – coke oven and natural gases are characterized by low mercury emissions. Comparative assessment of the calculated values of hazardous substances emissions in the combustion products in the process of combustion of natural, coke–oven and blast–furnace gases shows that even at lower working heat of combustion values the coke–oven and blast–furnace gases can compete with natural gas. For the first time, a comparative characterization of the emissions of harmful substances in the combustion of natural, coke oven and blast furnace gases is presented, and it is shown that the gases used in coke and metallurgical industries, which are used as analogues of natural, are logical to use, but require the installation of treatment systems. The paper defines a formula for calculating the carbon content in natural gas from the Urengoy–Uzhhorod gas pipeline. The provided calculations and the introduction of simplified formulas serve as an example for the calculation of emission factors and emissions in assessing the level of safety of existing equipment and can be used in the development of permit documents of enterprises that carry out emissions of harmful substances to the environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
USE OF UREA FOR CLEANING USED SEMI-SYNTHETIC MOTOR OILS TECHNOLOGY OF HYBRID MODIFICATION WITH HUMIC ACIDS OF BROWN COAL HYDROXYPROPYLMETHYL CELLULOSE FILMS TECHNOLOGICAL AND CONSTRUCTIVE OPTIMIZATION OF SEPARATORS OF THE GAS PREPARATION INSTALLATION SORPTION PROPERTIES OF OXIDIZED AND NON-OXIDIZED ACTIVATED CARBON FOR COPPER(II) IONS APPLICATION OF UHF INSTALLATIONS FOR THE MANUFACTUREOF MOLDED THERMAL INSULATION PRODUCTS BASED ON LIQUID GLASS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1