保护森林还是拯救树木?欧盟对全球森林砍伐的监管方法

IF 2 3区 社会学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law Pub Date : 2021-09-03 DOI:10.1111/reel.12413
Elisabeth V. Henn
{"title":"保护森林还是拯救树木?欧盟对全球森林砍伐的监管方法","authors":"Elisabeth V. Henn","doi":"10.1111/reel.12413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given the poor problem-solving effectiveness of international environmental law and a decline in multilateralism, unilateral approaches to halting deforestation globally have acquired increasing significance. Within this context, the European Union (EU) has adopted the EU Timber Regulation and the first and second Renewable Energy Directive, all of which have extraterritorial implications. Given continuing high rates of defor-estation, the European Union has also been assessing which mix of instruments might prove more effective in preventing global deforestation. This article contextualizes these regulatory endeavours, analyses the specific interactions and features of existing instruments under EU law, such as due diligence obligations, sustainability criteria, certification schemes and bilateral agreements, and discusses the challenges arising from World Trade Organization (WTO) law regarding potentially more effective mandatory instruments. It finds that while the existing framework contains promising pathways for future regulation, designing sustainability criteria that are technically meaningful and also feasible from the perspective of WTO law requires greater policy coherence.","PeriodicalId":51681,"journal":{"name":"Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protecting forests or saving trees? The EU's regulatory approach to global deforestation\",\"authors\":\"Elisabeth V. Henn\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/reel.12413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Given the poor problem-solving effectiveness of international environmental law and a decline in multilateralism, unilateral approaches to halting deforestation globally have acquired increasing significance. Within this context, the European Union (EU) has adopted the EU Timber Regulation and the first and second Renewable Energy Directive, all of which have extraterritorial implications. Given continuing high rates of defor-estation, the European Union has also been assessing which mix of instruments might prove more effective in preventing global deforestation. This article contextualizes these regulatory endeavours, analyses the specific interactions and features of existing instruments under EU law, such as due diligence obligations, sustainability criteria, certification schemes and bilateral agreements, and discusses the challenges arising from World Trade Organization (WTO) law regarding potentially more effective mandatory instruments. It finds that while the existing framework contains promising pathways for future regulation, designing sustainability criteria that are technically meaningful and also feasible from the perspective of WTO law requires greater policy coherence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12413\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12413","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

鉴于国际环境法解决问题的效率低下和多边主义的衰落,制止全球森林砍伐的单边办法变得越来越重要。在此背景下,欧洲联盟(EU)通过了欧盟木材条例以及第一和第二项可再生能源指令,所有这些都具有域外影响。鉴于森林砍伐率持续居高不下,欧洲联盟也一直在评估哪种混合手段可能在防止全球森林砍伐方面更有效。本文将这些监管努力置于背景下,分析欧盟法律下现有文书的具体相互作用和特征,如尽职调查义务、可持续性标准、认证计划和双边协议,并讨论世界贸易组织(WTO)法律在潜在更有效的强制性文书方面所带来的挑战。报告发现,虽然现有框架包含了未来监管的有希望的途径,但从世贸组织法律的角度来看,设计具有技术意义且可行的可持续性标准需要更大的政策一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Protecting forests or saving trees? The EU's regulatory approach to global deforestation
Given the poor problem-solving effectiveness of international environmental law and a decline in multilateralism, unilateral approaches to halting deforestation globally have acquired increasing significance. Within this context, the European Union (EU) has adopted the EU Timber Regulation and the first and second Renewable Energy Directive, all of which have extraterritorial implications. Given continuing high rates of defor-estation, the European Union has also been assessing which mix of instruments might prove more effective in preventing global deforestation. This article contextualizes these regulatory endeavours, analyses the specific interactions and features of existing instruments under EU law, such as due diligence obligations, sustainability criteria, certification schemes and bilateral agreements, and discusses the challenges arising from World Trade Organization (WTO) law regarding potentially more effective mandatory instruments. It finds that while the existing framework contains promising pathways for future regulation, designing sustainability criteria that are technically meaningful and also feasible from the perspective of WTO law requires greater policy coherence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
48
期刊最新文献
National discretion or broadening acceptable interpretation? A comparative overview of the transposition and implementation of the Water Framework Directive The Czech Republic v Poland (Mine de Turów): Politics and implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive The awkward relations between EU innovation policies and environmental law Towards the adoption of climate change acts in the Visegrad Group countries A quasi‐normative conflict: Resolving the tension between investment treaties and climate action
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1