为什么是奥斯汀,而不是伯尼?追踪声誉和遗产的机制

Marilyn Francus
{"title":"为什么是奥斯汀,而不是伯尼?追踪声誉和遗产的机制","authors":"Marilyn Francus","doi":"10.5038/2157-7129.13.1.1328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the 200th anniversary of Austen’s death in 2017, the narrative of Austen’s rise to fame and her ongoing celebrity circulated throughout modern culture. But how did this happen? When Austen died in 1817, it was not obvious that Austen would become the archetypal British woman writer. Frances Burney was far more famous in her lifetime than Austen was in hers, and Burney’s novels (particularly Evelina and Cecilia) achieved as much, if not more, critical acclaim than Austen’s works. By comparing the afterlives of Jane Austen and Frances Burney, the factors that shape legacy come into focus—and scholars can use some of these factors to shape the legacy of British women writers today.","PeriodicalId":30251,"journal":{"name":"ABO Interactive Journal for Women in the Arts 16401830","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Austen, not Burney? Tracing the Mechanisms of Reputation and Legacy\",\"authors\":\"Marilyn Francus\",\"doi\":\"10.5038/2157-7129.13.1.1328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During the 200th anniversary of Austen’s death in 2017, the narrative of Austen’s rise to fame and her ongoing celebrity circulated throughout modern culture. But how did this happen? When Austen died in 1817, it was not obvious that Austen would become the archetypal British woman writer. Frances Burney was far more famous in her lifetime than Austen was in hers, and Burney’s novels (particularly Evelina and Cecilia) achieved as much, if not more, critical acclaim than Austen’s works. By comparing the afterlives of Jane Austen and Frances Burney, the factors that shape legacy come into focus—and scholars can use some of these factors to shape the legacy of British women writers today.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ABO Interactive Journal for Women in the Arts 16401830\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ABO Interactive Journal for Women in the Arts 16401830\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5038/2157-7129.13.1.1328\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ABO Interactive Journal for Women in the Arts 16401830","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5038/2157-7129.13.1.1328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2017年奥斯汀逝世200周年之际,奥斯汀成名的故事在现代文化中流传。但这是怎么发生的呢?当奥斯丁于1817年去世时,人们并不认为奥斯丁会成为英国女作家的典范。弗朗西丝·伯尼在世时比奥斯丁在世时名气大得多,伯尼的小说(尤其是《伊芙琳娜》和《塞西莉亚》)获得的评论界的赞誉与奥斯丁的作品一样多,甚至更多。通过比较简·奥斯丁和弗朗西丝·伯尼的身后生活,形成遗产的因素成为焦点——学者们可以利用其中的一些因素来塑造当今英国女作家的遗产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Why Austen, not Burney? Tracing the Mechanisms of Reputation and Legacy
During the 200th anniversary of Austen’s death in 2017, the narrative of Austen’s rise to fame and her ongoing celebrity circulated throughout modern culture. But how did this happen? When Austen died in 1817, it was not obvious that Austen would become the archetypal British woman writer. Frances Burney was far more famous in her lifetime than Austen was in hers, and Burney’s novels (particularly Evelina and Cecilia) achieved as much, if not more, critical acclaim than Austen’s works. By comparing the afterlives of Jane Austen and Frances Burney, the factors that shape legacy come into focus—and scholars can use some of these factors to shape the legacy of British women writers today.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
“Before I am Quite Forgot": Women’s Critical Literary Biography and the Future Mary Prince’s Undisciplining Lessons: Counter-Narrative and Testimonio in The History Plotting the Plantationocene with The History of Mary Prince Why Austen, not Burney? Tracing the Mechanisms of Reputation and Legacy Review of Figurations of the Feminine, by Siobhán McIlvanney
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1